Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > NFL Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2013   #1
SkinsHokieFan
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Posts:
2,051
Default WP: Redskins put contract talks on hold as they work to recoup salary cap

The only reason I am posting it here is that it should, in theory, have an impact on the Cowboys. I would assume if the Redskins get cap space back, so will your team

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ary-cap-space/

Quote:
Redskins put contract talks on hold as they work to recoup salary cap space

The Redskins have put contract negotiations with some of their players on hold, telling agents and players they remain hopeful they can recoup some of the salary cap space that was cut by the NFL last year, according to several people familiar with the situation.

Redskins officials have told those agents and players that they cannot negotiate in earnest until the salary cap matter is resolved. The players include some eligible for free agency in March and others who face the possibility of release unless their contracts are reworked, those people said.

They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the team does not want such issues discussed publicly.

The team has told parties involved that it hopes to reach a resolution by late this week.
Link for rest
SkinsHokieFan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 02-25-2013   #2
zrinkill
Diamond surrounded by trash
 
zrinkill's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
32,042
Default

Wrong forum


victory is ours
zrinkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #3
bkight13
Senior Member
 
bkight13's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2007
Posts:
884
Default

Really means asking Goddell "pretty please with sugar on top"
bkight13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #4
SilverStarCowboy
The Actualist
 
SilverStarCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
6,006
Default

The Cowboys and Skins got screwed by the League on this one. They could have fought legalities and won in court.


SilverStarCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #5
Stryker44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
446
Default

Vet min plus incentives. They are either believe in honor, discipline, and sacrifice or they don't.
Stryker44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #6
SkinsHokieFan
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Posts:
2,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverStarCowboy View Post
The Cowboys and Skins got screwed by the League on this one. They could have fought legalities and won in court.
Twitterdom rumors are that the Redskins are threatening the "nuclear option" and will sue, thusly holding up FA.

This is just rumors on twitter and nobody substantial (such as Shefter) has reported it. However it is very interesting if true

Confirmed by the Washington Post (those rumors)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ary-cap-space/

Quote:
Update: 3:37: Redskins officials have told people in the league that they are considering going to court to seek an injunction that would hold up the start of free agency or threatening that move in a bid to bolster their negotiating leverage with the league. Those conversations were confirmed by two people with knowledge of them.

Both said that the Redskins have compelling arguments they could make in an attempt to convince a judge that they would suffer irreparable harm if they are not granted an injunction. But others familiar with the case have said they don’t believe the Redskins have legal arguments that weren’t already considered, and rejected, by an arbitrator.
SkinsHokieFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #7
Muhast
Newo
 
Muhast's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
7,098
Default

Dont forget, if they win, they should get an additional 1.2 million to use above the cap. Every team in the league was given that bc of our penalties. So not only should they be awarded the cap room they should get the additional per diem the other 30 teams had
Muhast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013   #8
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,186
Default

I think Snyder is bluffing if he is even trying. More likely typical internet rumors. If he was really going to do something he would have done it before now.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013   #9
Stryker44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
446
Default

Keeping fingers crossed. Both the Skins and the Cowboys really got screwed and deserve some money back...if not last year's at least this year.
Stryker44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013   #10
burntricersx
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2006
Location:
DC Metro
Posts:
503
Send a message via AIM to burntricersx
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsHokieFan View Post
Twitterdom rumors are that the Redskins are threatening the "nuclear option" and will sue, thusly holding up FA.

This is just rumors on twitter and nobody substantial (such as Shefter) has reported it. However it is very interesting if true

Confirmed by the Washington Post (those rumors)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ary-cap-space/
Wouldn't blame them, they got hit hard. 18M is backbreaking.
Lee/Carter...the new dynamic duo
burntricersx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013   #11
Ntegrase96
Senior Member
 
Ntegrase96's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2009
Posts:
697
Default

We all wish something could be done, but it just won't happen.

Although the redskins got screwed, I don't think the Redskins have much of a case.

We all know the NFL conducts itself more like a cartel than it does a business, so normal anti trust laws don't really apply here. In exchange for being an NFL franchise, they've essentially agreed to abide by anything the NFL decides to enforce. And with the vague idea of 'preserving competitive balance', pretty much any kind of action the competition committee takes can be justified as long as it's for "the good of the NFL".


The NFLPA, on the other hand could have a case, but DeMaurice Smith signed off on the cap sanctions so there goes that.

Could the Redskins help the NFLPA build a case against the rest of the NFL? Probably... but why would they want to do that? They'd destroy themselves in the process as well.

Just move on... it's done with.
Ntegrase96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013   #12
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ntegrase96 View Post
We all wish something could be done, but it just won't happen.

Although the redskins got screwed, I don't think the Redskins have much of a case.

We all know the NFL conducts itself more like a cartel than it does a business, so normal anti trust laws don't really apply here. In exchange for being an NFL franchise, they've essentially agreed to abide by anything the NFL decides to enforce. And with the vague idea of 'preserving competitive balance', pretty much any kind of action the competition committee takes can be justified as long as it's for "the good of the NFL".


The NFLPA, on the other hand could have a case, but DeMaurice Smith signed off on the cap sanctions so there goes that.

Could the Redskins help the NFLPA build a case against the rest of the NFL? Probably... but why would they want to do that? They'd destroy themselves in the process as well.

[View Full Quote]
If he can prove collusion nothing else matters. Collusion is illegal under any circumstances
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2013   #13
Ntegrase96
Senior Member
 
Ntegrase96's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2009
Posts:
697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
If he can prove collusion nothing else matters. Collusion is illegal under any circumstances
I'll get to the issue with proving collusion in a minute...

First off the Redskins, nor the Cowboys were colluded against. The collusion argument is that the Owners withheld money from the NFLPA by setting an imaginary cap in an uncapped year.

So what does Snyder stand to gain by going against other Owners and helping the NFLPA prove collusion? That would be a big win for the NFLPA and a big loss for the Owners.

All that aside, how is that even collusion if the Owners and the NFLPA did not have an agreement in place at the time of said collusion?
Ntegrase96 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com