
|
03-01-2013
|
#16
|
|
Intramural Legend
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Canandaigua, NY |
Posts: | 12,821 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboysooner
Man I don't know if I've seen a tackle with more upside than Lane Johnson. He has been playing the position for 18 months and stoned everybody in his last year of playing the position. He then is voted best lineman over a great player in Fisher at the Senior Bowl, then puts on a show in the underwear Olympics.
Both guys went from 230-240 in high school to 305 as a draft prospect. They are very similar guys.
|
I can get on board with the fact that they are both very similar physically. Absolutely.
But I still give the edge to Tyron because Johnson is already either 23 or 24 (can't find a bday for some reason)
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2010 |
Posts: | 1,256 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future
I can get on board with the fact that they are both very similar physically. Absolutely.
But I still give the edge to Tyron because Johnson is already either 23 or 24 (can't find a bday for some reason)
|
Johnson is 22 and turns 23 after the draft.
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#18
|
|
Intramural Legend
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Canandaigua, NY |
Posts: | 12,821 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboysooner
Johnson is 22 and turns 23 after the draft.
|
The only thing I saw was that he was born in 89...either way, Tyron was still younger.
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#19
|
|
Pixel Pusher
Joined: | Aug 2007 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 19,579 |
|
He'd probably be 3rd or 4th, and I'm basing that primarily on his lack of experience on the left side.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 11,470 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount
He'd probably be 3rd or 4th, and I'm basing that primarily on his lack of experience on the left side.
|
Agreed.
He would probably be the #3 tackle in this years draft.
As the official head coach of the Dallas Cowboys, Jason Garrett is 16-16............"Its a Process of stacking good days"
2013 Prediction: "NO PLAYOFFS"
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#21
|
|
Mr. Fixit
Joined: | Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 6,276 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount
He'd probably be 3rd or 4th, and I'm basing that primarily on his lack of experience on the left side.
|
Agreed. He would be the 4th LT in this draft. People are just being homers. The better question is where would JJ Watt be ranked in this draft.
"Our guys are gonna be good, and we know it. So that ain't talkin'. That's just the (bleepin') way it is."
Rob Ryan, Dallas Cowboys DC
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2008 |
Posts: | 3,419 |
|
Just dawned on me who Tyron Smith reminds me of.... a young Lomas Brown.
Lomas Brown always seemed like a skinny kick butt LT to me.
In Lomas's first two - three years he was considered something of a disappointment vs where he was drafted (6th overall) but he eventually become one of the premier tackles in the league.
I'm not saying Tyron has been a disappointment per say but I do see some parallels in their body types (adjusted for today's era), athleticism, both of them not quite being quite as good as expected early on.... eventually Lomas put it all together and became a stud. I see that happening with Tyron this season.
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#23
|
|
The Chairman
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 9,718 |
|
we get Lane Johnson........... we are set for many years.
Tyron and Lane would be awesome.
|
|
|
03-01-2013
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Edmonton, Albert |
Posts: | 12,201 |
|
The only problem with having two great tackles is that you couldn`t afford both of them once contract renewals came up.
I`d be happy to get a second round type RT except for the fact that I think Parnell can man the position better than a rookie next year and still shows tons of upside for the future. I think the Cowboys brass played him so much at the end of the season because they were planning on releasing Free and wanted to get a peak at how Parnell would fare at RT.
|
|
|
03-02-2013
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2012 |
Location: | The Mid Altantic |
Posts: | 2,118 |
|
Number one tackle probably...
|
|
|
03-02-2013
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,759 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future
Agreed. Higher ceiling than the other guys, and when your drafting that early, potential is important. And while I don't know whether or not teams take this into consideration, he was also super young coming out. That extra year or two to develop before hitting prime age makes a huge difference to me. Give me the 21 year old with a ton of potential over the guy who can come in and be solid from day 1 but is 23 every time.
|
Kiper said in his most recent chat that he didn't think there was a true top 10 talent in this draft. I agree with him. But Tyron was. I wouldn't even question putting Joeckel or Fisher ahead of him. Or Lane Johnson, and I'm an OU fan.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
03-02-2013
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Posts: | 4,687 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboysooner
Johnson is 22 and turns 23 after the draft.
|
Did you find an accurate birthdate?
I saw one website that had it a January.
The best I could find is that he graduated HS in 2008. That corresponds to 22 or 23 as you indicated.
You don’t know what you don’t know.
Half of the population has below average intelligence.
|
|
|
03-02-2013
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Posts: | 4,687 |
|
Tyron benched more than Joeckel, Fisher or Johnson while having longer arms and being at least 1 year younger than any of them.
You don’t know what you don’t know.
Half of the population has below average intelligence.
|
|
|
03-02-2013
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Edmonton, Albert |
Posts: | 12,201 |
|
I think Tyron would have been the first OT off the board in this draft.
I think he showed in his first year that he can be a dominant RT and graded out as the second best RT in the league on PFF, FWIW. This year he struggled a bit in the transition to LT but you could see he was much better by the end of the year than at the beginning. It is true that teams would have had to project him to LT at the draft but the athletic skillset was there for LT and that is what teams are most worried about. Most people can flip flop from one side to the other, it is just a matter of reps to reverse the footwork required.
Tyron showed back in his draft year that he had all the tools and some were practically off the chart. He also had very good speed and agility to go with great size and length. Then you add great strength on top with all those reps with the 36.5 inch arms and 11 inch hands and he is a no-brainer top 10 picks when you add his impressive highlight film. The biggest question from what I recall was whether he was big enough to play OT with rumours of him weighing 275 pounds but those were answered when he showed up at 307 pounds. You have to remember that he was only 20 in his rookie year. Next year he will be 23 which is the same age as some of the rookies going in this draft. You had to include projection in there for improvement in technique and strength just on the basis of age given he was two years younger than most of the other draftees.
Having said that, I`d love it if Lane Johnson were to fall into our laps but I think someone will trade up for him if he falls outside of the top 10. I was just mesmerized by the way he moves out there on the field at his size. What a pair of book ends we could have.
|
|
|
03-02-2013
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2008 |
Posts: | 3,419 |
|
Tyron Smith would have been drafted before anybody in this year's OL class, however. Matt Kalil (last year) was the best LT prospect of the past three years.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.
|