
|
10-17-2004
|
#1
|
|
DKRandom
Joined: | Aug 2004 |
Location: | http://www.thepo |
Posts: | 11,519 |
|
VInny is NOT better then QC
we coudl eaisly be 0-5 right now
and Vinny is not the cause of our winning
He has put us in thepostion to lose in every single game
losing 3 of them
We should of never relased Quincy he had least didnt put us in losing situations in every single game
#Bootz2A..
Football Style
1. Redskins - Check
2. Dolphins - Check
3. Arizona -
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#2
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 22,015 |
|
Case for Quincy building
We are 2-3 and the Vet VT fumbled this victory away....
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#3
|
|
Fascinated
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Idaho |
Posts: | 650 |
|
no reason to look back at quincy, he might have been better than vinny, but it's too late to think "what if" now
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Austin, TX |
Posts: | 5,945 |
|
No, QC sucked...period. VT is slightly better. We need a much better QB. Hopefully Henson is.
Record: 2-3 as of 10/15/2012 | Prediction: 7-9 | Final: 8-8 with a Romo choke
"Stupidity. Ignorance. Closed mindedness. All things that keep the Garrett haters in their bubble." - a_minimalist
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#5
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 981 |
|
**** QC, **** Hutch, **** Vinny
And **** you for bringing up this stupid thread you piece of ****
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
it's not about what if...it's about what now?
Quincy Testeverde lost us this game, and has come very close in every other game to doing the same
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | H-Town |
Posts: | 4,099 |
|
At least Vinny can complete passes.
That ignorant moron named QC probably would have thrown several picks.
This loss belongs to the coaches on that final 3rd and 13 play call. No max protect or run play when the Steelers were obviously coming.,
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Location: | NE Louisiana |
Posts: | 26,374 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dargonking999
we coudl eaisly be 0-5 right now
and Vinny is not the cause of our winning
He has put us in thepostion to lose in every single game
losing 3 of them
We should of never relased Quincy he had least didnt put us in losing situations in every single game
|
Maybe, but the real question is whether Carter would've been playing under the influence or not.
Carter's old news. Let it go.
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,598 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nors
We are 2-3 and the Vet VT fumbled this victory away....
|
Put the blame where it belongs, ANDERSON caused the fumble.
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
Vinny vs. Quincy
Both make enough plays to give you hope
Both get very lucky not to have more interceptions than they do
Both get sacked alot
Both fumble when they're not hit
Both have lost games for the Dallas Cowboys
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 470 |
|
Vinny shouldve felt how close Anderson was to him. He couldve moved his feet or something. And Vinny wouldve thrown more INT's if the steelers DB's could catch. This team has no running threat that will scare teams. Until one is found the boys will continue to be an average team.
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 517 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kmp77
No, QC sucked...period. VT is slightly better. We need a much better QB. Hopefully Henson is.
|
NOT.
VT is NOT better than QC.
Did you see the duck he threw earlier in the game than the Steeler DB dropped?
It looked worse than those mallards he threw in the Cleveland game.
Everytime QC mad those bad throws he was crucified by the media, fans, and everybody else in between.
Testeverde sucks.
[FONT=Palatino Linotype]"Your ridiculous little opinion has been noted."[/FONT]
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
it's not just the fumble from Vinny
It's the underthrows, the overthrows, the near INTs as well
He's old guys!
I wouldn't be opposed to putting Romo in there.
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Location: | NE Louisiana |
Posts: | 26,374 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blindzebra
Put the blame where it belongs, ANDERSON caused the fumble.
|
True, but I also say that the outcome of this game was partially due to another bonehead play. Barnes had an excellent opportunity to give the team great field advantage inside Steeler territory by falling on a fumble caused by Davis. But could he simply fall on the ball first? Noooooo...
That's potential points taken off the scoreboard. The Anderson miscue might not have hurt the team in the end--IF people had their heads screwed on right when a turnover was gifted to them. Barnes is on more on my [censored] list than Anderson right now.
|
|
|
10-17-2004
|
#15
|
|
I've got moxie
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 9,114 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blindzebra
Put the blame where it belongs, ANDERSON caused the fumble.
|
That would hinder their ability to trash Vinny.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.
|