Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2008   #1
JaiRiid
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
182
Default RB-Chauncey Washington (USC) runs 4.32

from Yahoo Sports... http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns

Quote:
Running back Chauncey Washington, used throughout much of his career as a power back due to his muscular 6-foot, 211-pound frame, turned in the surprise performance of the day when he registered a pair of sub-4.4 40s. Stunned scouts immediately began comparing stop-watches, with times ranging from 4.32 to 4.39. Washington, though invited, had elected not to run at the combine. He had widely been estimated by scouts to have marginal speed. In compiling impressive results in the vertical jump (36 inches), broad jump (9’11”) and bench press (18), Washington proved his athleticism is legitimate and not just speed-driven.

“Washington helped himself (Wednesday),” Thompson said. “He was prepared. He ran well. He looked good in positional drills. Caught the ball well.”
All that being said, there must be some reason he was never a feature back at USC. I love me some MBIII, but if anything happens to him, this guy could be a sleeper pick for a power RB.

Other info about him...

Scouting Report
THE GOOD: Has a powerful slashing style with the ability to run through tacklers and get the most out of each attempt. He is a powerfully built, compact runner with thick legs and strong frame that allows him to take on defenders and finish his runs well.
THE BAD: He shared time at USC and never was a true feature back. He lacks elite speed, which limits his big-play ability. He is an underdeveloped receiver.
OUTLOOK: He has definite pro potential and could be one of the sleepers in this deep class of runners because of his ability to effectively run inside and outside. He has the makings of a good pro runner and has intriguing potential if he can develop as a receiver and blocker - and answer the durability questions. His just-adequate speed will force him to the late rounds, where he could be one of the best bargains in the draft.
JaiRiid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-07-2008   #2
StarHead69
Senior Member
 
StarHead69's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Gresham, Texas
Posts:
1,258
Default

I noticed this kids numbers from the USC pro day article a few days ago. He put up some eye-popping 40-times. He seems like a project who could handle the #3RB spot and offer some good upside down the road. I can't remember seeing him play, so someone who has watched a few USC games thinks he brings anything to the table is welcome to give us a breakdown.
-----------------------------------------------
BTW I have been thinking about the possibility of trading #22 & #28 to the Lions for Roy Williams and their #15. That actually would about be the same value (a little better points wise) for them as if we traded our 2nd for Roy W.
StarHead69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #3
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,585
Default

Wouldn't mind him as a 3rd back based on this info, but I've never seen him play. If he's got power and that kind of speed, that's a pretty good combo.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #4
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,551
Default

I've watched USC a lot. Chauncy is not a bad back at all IMO. The problem with a back going to USC is that unless you are an all world type RB, your never going to get your carries. Last year, SC had no less then 11 RBs on the roster, and that doesn't include FBs. Between Stefon Johnson, Joe Mcknight and Washington, there just are not enough carries to go around. 06 was the same way. Gable, Moody and Washington all shared carries. Prior to that, you had Bush and White so you know there isn't any room to carry the rock.

Of the two seasons that Washington played, he lead the team in Yards and carries. It's hard to evaluate players from SC IMO. They are so good, everywhere, that you don't know if it's the offense that is driving production or the player and his skills.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #5
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,820
Default

Maybe being named Chauncey hurt his playing time.


BrAinPaiNt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #6
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt View Post
Maybe being named Chauncey hurt his playing time.
I don't know, anything is possible. This guy has had trouble staying on the field and I think he might be coming off a knee injury but I can't remember.
Here are all his Pro Day numbers.

Ht. 5-11 1/4
Wt. 215 lbs.
40 time 4.45
20 time 2.53
10 time 1.51
225 Bench 18 Reps
Vert. 36
Broad Jump 9'11"
20 Shuttle 4.58
3-Cone 7.53
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #7
Bob Sacamano
Banned
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
57,074
Default

straight-line runner, his shuttle is horrible as is his 3-cone
Bob Sacamano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #8
MCowboys
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2007
Posts:
289
Default

He didn't produce all that much or break too many big runs for a "power back" with 4.3 speed.
MCowboys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #9
DaBoys4Life
Banned
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
Cowboy Nation
Posts:
15,621
Default

i never even heard of this guy be4 and he plays for USC he aint nothin pass
DaBoys4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #10
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano View Post
straight-line runner, his shuttle is horrible as is his 3-cone
So you've been watching a lot of Chauncey I take it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBoys4Life View Post
i never even heard of this guy be4 and he plays for USC he aint nothin pass
And you know about every other player in the draft, I'm sure.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #11
Bob Sacamano
Banned
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
57,074
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
So you've been watching a lot of Chauncey I take it?
very little, so...

NFLDraftScout

Negatives:

Lacks the speed to be an effective outside runner. Isn't going to make many defenders miss in the open field due to marginal agility and acceleration

so by watching tapes, they've deducted that Chauncey doesn't run nearly as fast as his 40, and isn't very agile or explosive, so again, straight-line runner

the only backs I've watched enough of to make good enough evals are Cory Boyd, Thomas Brown and Tony Temple, so I rely on the scouts for the rest
Bob Sacamano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #12
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano View Post
very little, so...

NFLDraftScout

Negatives:

Lacks the speed to be an effective outside runner. Isn't going to make many defenders miss in the open field due to marginal agility and acceleration

so by watching tapes, they've deducted that Chauncey doesn't run nearly as fast as his 40, and isn't very agile or explosive, so again, straight-line runner

the only backs I've watched enough of to make good enough evals are Cory Boyd, Thomas Brown and Tony Temple, so I rely on the scouts for the rest
Well Scott Wright says:

Strengths:
Has excellent size and good bulk...A good athlete...Hits the hole hard...More quick than fast but has a little wiggle...Tough, physical runner who will break tackles...A good inside runner...Has nimble feet...Decent hands..Might still have some upside.

Weaknesses:
Playing speed's below average..Intelligence is a question mark..Not real explosive or a big play threat...Vision and instincts are lackluster...Has limited experience as a pass catcher...Poor awareness and isn't a good blocker...Durability is a concern.

I'd say that's enough to spend a late pick on a guy, not like we're talking 3rd round here.

Off all his weaknesses, I'd say the blocking is the thing to be most worried about.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #13
Bob Sacamano
Banned
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
57,074
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
Well Scott Wright says:

Strengths:
Has excellent size and good bulk...A good athlete...Hits the hole hard...More quick than fast but has a little wiggle...Tough, physical runner who will break tackles...A good inside runner...Has nimble feet...Decent hands..Might still have some upside.

Weaknesses:
Playing speed's below average..Intelligence is a question mark..Not real explosive or a big play threat...Vision and instincts are lackluster...Has limited experience as a pass catcher...Poor awareness and isn't a good blocker...Durability is a concern.

I'd say that's enough to spend a late pick on a guy, not like we're talking 3rd round here.

Off all his weaknesses, I'd say the blocking is the thing to be most worried about.
I'm just pointing out that he's a straight-line runner
Bob Sacamano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #14
Biggems
White and Nerdy
 
Biggems's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2006
Location:
San Antonio
Posts:
11,314
Default

i just dont understand why a 5 star prospect would go to USC, knowing they have like 6-7 other 5 star prospects at that same position. Why not go to another school and get the carries, the playing time, the exposure, and the potential to be the big man on campus.
GOGO
Biggems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008   #15
JustinTheDestructor
Junior Member
 
JustinTheDestructor's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2008
Posts:
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggems View Post
i just dont understand why a 5 star prospect would go to USC, knowing they have like 6-7 other 5 star prospects at that same position. Why not go to another school and get the carries, the playing time, the exposure, and the potential to be the big man on campus.
Because you'd be going to USC. Great place to chase the muff around.
JustinTheDestructor is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com