
|
04-07-2008
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 182 |
|
RB-Chauncey Washington (USC) runs 4.32
from Yahoo Sports... http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns
Quote:
Running back Chauncey Washington, used throughout much of his career as a power back due to his muscular 6-foot, 211-pound frame, turned in the surprise performance of the day when he registered a pair of sub-4.4 40s. Stunned scouts immediately began comparing stop-watches, with times ranging from 4.32 to 4.39. Washington, though invited, had elected not to run at the combine. He had widely been estimated by scouts to have marginal speed. In compiling impressive results in the vertical jump (36 inches), broad jump (9’11”) and bench press (18), Washington proved his athleticism is legitimate and not just speed-driven.
“Washington helped himself (Wednesday),” Thompson said. “He was prepared. He ran well. He looked good in positional drills. Caught the ball well.”
|
All that being said, there must be some reason he was never a feature back at USC. I love me some MBIII, but if anything happens to him, this guy could be a sleeper pick for a power RB.
Other info about him...
Scouting Report
THE GOOD: Has a powerful slashing style with the ability to run through tacklers and get the most out of each attempt. He is a powerfully built, compact runner with thick legs and strong frame that allows him to take on defenders and finish his runs well.
THE BAD: He shared time at USC and never was a true feature back. He lacks elite speed, which limits his big-play ability. He is an underdeveloped receiver.
OUTLOOK: He has definite pro potential and could be one of the sleepers in this deep class of runners because of his ability to effectively run inside and outside. He has the makings of a good pro runner and has intriguing potential if he can develop as a receiver and blocker - and answer the durability questions. His just-adequate speed will force him to the late rounds, where he could be one of the best bargains in the draft.
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Gresham, Texas |
Posts: | 1,258 |
|
I noticed this kids numbers from the USC pro day article a few days ago. He put up some eye-popping 40-times. He seems like a project who could handle the #3RB spot and offer some good upside down the road. I can't remember seeing him play, so someone who has watched a few USC games thinks he brings anything to the table is welcome to give us a breakdown.
-----------------------------------------------
BTW I have been thinking about the possibility of trading #22 & #28 to the Lions for Roy Williams and their #15. That actually would about be the same value (a little better points wise) for them as if we traded our 2nd for Roy W.
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#3
|
|
Pixel Pusher
Joined: | Aug 2007 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 19,585 |
|
Wouldn't mind him as a 3rd back based on this info, but I've never seen him play. If he's got power and that kind of speed, that's a pretty good combo.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,551 |
|
I've watched USC a lot. Chauncy is not a bad back at all IMO. The problem with a back going to USC is that unless you are an all world type RB, your never going to get your carries. Last year, SC had no less then 11 RBs on the roster, and that doesn't include FBs. Between Stefon Johnson, Joe Mcknight and Washington, there just are not enough carries to go around. 06 was the same way. Gable, Moody and Washington all shared carries. Prior to that, you had Bush and White so you know there isn't any room to carry the rock.
Of the two seasons that Washington played, he lead the team in Yards and carries. It's hard to evaluate players from SC IMO. They are so good, everywhere, that you don't know if it's the offense that is driving production or the player and his skills.
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#5
|
|
Dark Days
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 56,820 |
|
Maybe being named Chauncey hurt his playing time. 
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,551 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt
Maybe being named Chauncey hurt his playing time. 
|
I don't know, anything is possible. This guy has had trouble staying on the field and I think he might be coming off a knee injury but I can't remember.
Here are all his Pro Day numbers.
Ht. 5-11 1/4
Wt. 215 lbs.
40 time 4.45
20 time 2.53
10 time 1.51
225 Bench 18 Reps
Vert. 36
Broad Jump 9'11"
20 Shuttle 4.58
3-Cone 7.53
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#7
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
straight-line runner, his shuttle is horrible as is his 3-cone
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2007 |
Posts: | 289 |
|
He didn't produce all that much or break too many big runs for a "power back" with 4.3 speed.
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#9
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Jan 2008 |
Location: | Cowboy Nation |
Posts: | 15,621 |
|
i never even heard of this guy be4 and he plays for USC he aint nothin pass
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#10
|
|
Pixel Pusher
Joined: | Aug 2007 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 19,585 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano
straight-line runner, his shuttle is horrible as is his 3-cone
|
So you've been watching a lot of Chauncey I take it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBoys4Life
i never even heard of this guy be4 and he plays for USC he aint nothin pass
|
And you know about every other player in the draft, I'm sure.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#11
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount
So you've been watching a lot of Chauncey I take it?
|
very little, so...
NFLDraftScout
Negatives:
Lacks the speed to be an effective outside runner. Isn't going to make many defenders miss in the open field due to marginal agility and acceleration
so by watching tapes, they've deducted that Chauncey doesn't run nearly as fast as his 40, and isn't very agile or explosive, so again, straight-line runner
the only backs I've watched enough of to make good enough evals are Cory Boyd, Thomas Brown and Tony Temple, so I rely on the scouts for the rest
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#12
|
|
Pixel Pusher
Joined: | Aug 2007 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 19,585 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano
very little, so...
NFLDraftScout
Negatives:
Lacks the speed to be an effective outside runner. Isn't going to make many defenders miss in the open field due to marginal agility and acceleration
so by watching tapes, they've deducted that Chauncey doesn't run nearly as fast as his 40, and isn't very agile or explosive, so again, straight-line runner
the only backs I've watched enough of to make good enough evals are Cory Boyd, Thomas Brown and Tony Temple, so I rely on the scouts for the rest
|
Well Scott Wright says:
Strengths:
Has excellent size and good bulk...A good athlete...Hits the hole hard...More quick than fast but has a little wiggle...Tough, physical runner who will break tackles...A good inside runner...Has nimble feet...Decent hands..Might still have some upside.
Weaknesses:
Playing speed's below average..Intelligence is a question mark..Not real explosive or a big play threat...Vision and instincts are lackluster...Has limited experience as a pass catcher...Poor awareness and isn't a good blocker...Durability is a concern.
I'd say that's enough to spend a late pick on a guy, not like we're talking 3rd round here.
Off all his weaknesses, I'd say the blocking is the thing to be most worried about.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#13
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount
Well Scott Wright says:
Strengths:
Has excellent size and good bulk...A good athlete...Hits the hole hard...More quick than fast but has a little wiggle...Tough, physical runner who will break tackles...A good inside runner...Has nimble feet...Decent hands..Might still have some upside.
Weaknesses:
Playing speed's below average..Intelligence is a question mark..Not real explosive or a big play threat...Vision and instincts are lackluster...Has limited experience as a pass catcher...Poor awareness and isn't a good blocker...Durability is a concern.
I'd say that's enough to spend a late pick on a guy, not like we're talking 3rd round here.
Off all his weaknesses, I'd say the blocking is the thing to be most worried about.
|
I'm just pointing out that he's a straight-line runner
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#14
|
|
White and Nerdy
Joined: | Apr 2006 |
Location: | San Antonio |
Posts: | 11,314 |
|
i just dont understand why a 5 star prospect would go to USC, knowing they have like 6-7 other 5 star prospects at that same position. Why not go to another school and get the carries, the playing time, the exposure, and the potential to be the big man on campus.
GO GO
|
|
|
04-07-2008
|
#15
|
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggems
i just dont understand why a 5 star prospect would go to USC, knowing they have like 6-7 other 5 star prospects at that same position. Why not go to another school and get the carries, the playing time, the exposure, and the potential to be the big man on campus.
|
Because you'd be going to USC. Great place to chase the muff around.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.
|