Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2009 Archives > Political Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2008   #1
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,945
Default Abstinence Only Not working, Feds Say After Study Found One In Four Girls Had STD

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7010767688

Abstinence Only Not working, Feds Say After Study Found One In Four Girls Had STD

Amy Beeman - AHN

Washington, D.C. (AHN) -- The federal government is deciding whether it will continue to fund abstinence only education in schools since the CDC released findings this year that one in four girls has a sexually transmitted disease.

Another reason some feel abstinence only programs do not work is that the U.S has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in developed countries, at about 750,000 a year.

The BBC in Washington reported that 17 states have already declined the funding.

According to CBS news, 14 states require abstinence and contraception education to be taught in schools. Nineteen states require abstinence only to be the rule, but will allow contraception education to be taught. The other 17 states do not relegate how the school boards handle sexual education.

Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards was quoted by the BBC saying,"This national program which has wasted $1.5 billion of tax money is a failure and our teens are paying the price. We've been wasting money on programs that don't work and we're seeing the consequences every single day."

Roger Norman, abstinence only proponent said abstinence is about more than sex. He was quoted by the BBC as saying, "Self control leads to a happy, joyful life. If we can learn to control the most basic of drives - the sex drive - for good, then we can control drugs, gangs, alcohol and abusive anger."

__________________________________________________ ___________________________---

If you want to teach your kids abstinence only then that is your right to do that in your own home.

If they are using yours and my tax dollars to support sex ed, then it should be a more thorough approach than jusst an abstinence only program.

Of course I have always said, if they are teaching any sex ed in schools, then parents have the right to have their child not attend and opt out of those classes.
joseephuss is offline  

Old 04-30-2008   #2
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,813
Default

Abstinence only programs in PUBLIC schools is idiotic and only pushed by certain groups who are in denial of what high school kids do. But hey, we all know that lord forbid you teach about birth and std prevention it will only lead to more of both births and stds...I guess it MAY lead to more, just not as many as abstinence only programs.

<---Sits back and ways for a group to tell me a bunch of bull now.


BrAinPaiNt is online now  
Old 04-30-2008   #3
Yeagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yeagermeister's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
47,523
Default

RIP Weldon "Pops" Parkhill....I will miss you my friend
R.I.P. Renee I miss you sis
Yeagermeister is offline  
Old 04-30-2008   #4
Cajuncowboy
Preacher From The Black Lagoon
 
Cajuncowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
State of Grace
Posts:
27,478
Default

So what this study is saying that 1 in 4 girls have stds, Right?

Which is 25%.

And as for the other 75%, what? They are STD free?

So we are going to lay the whole blame on Abstinence programs because 25% got a disease.

Yep, makes sense to me.


For a great free bible study tool check out http://www.e-sword.net

"Those who would deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves..."-Abraham Lincoln
Cajuncowboy is offline  
Old 04-30-2008   #5
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,167
Default

Its the BBC anyway. You know anything on America will be put by them in the worst possible way.

You notice that they do not mention all the other problems they cannot blame on abstinence.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is online now  
Old 04-30-2008   #6
Jon88
Banned
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,666
Default

Doesn't work. Just makes people curious.
Jon88 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008   #7
Jon88
Banned
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeagermeister View Post
Needs to trim his fingernails and shave. And the eyebrow. He's old man. It's over.
Jon88 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008   #8
ScipioCowboy
Convicted of Gnostical Turpitude
 
ScipioCowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jan 2007
Location:
Gatesville, Texa
Posts:
11,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy View Post
So what this study is saying that 1 in 4 girls have stds, Right?

Which is 25%.

And as for the other 75%, what? They are STD free?

So we are going to lay the whole blame on Abstinence programs because 25% got a disease.

Yep, makes sense to me.
Furthermore, Cajun, the article never posits a direct a correlation between Abstinence Only Education and the 1 in 4 STD statistic.

In fact, the article explicitiy that all 50 states allow for contraception education. Fourteen states actually require contraception education, and 17 states have no regulations one way or the other.

In my opinion, the real problem here is a lack of parental involvement. The idea that highly personal subjects such as sex and intimacy can be properly addressed by a state-mandated education course is utterly ludicrous.

Unfortunately, our culture tends to glorify and romanticize promiscuous lifestyles, even to the point of implying that abstinance is abnormal. Only parental involvement can counteract these messages.
ScipioCowboy is offline  
Old 05-01-2008   #9
Ben_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Jul 2006
Location:
On the grill
Posts:
2,898
Default

One in four girls, which means guess what fellas?
Ben_n_austin is offline  
Old 05-01-2008   #10
Ben_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Jul 2006
Location:
On the grill
Posts:
2,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScipioCowboy View Post
Furthermore, Cajun, the article never posits a direct a correlation between Abstinence Only Education and the 1 in 4 STD statistic.

In fact, the article explicitiy that all 50 states allow for contraception education. Fourteen states actually require contraception education, and 17 states have no regulations one way or the other.

In my opinion, the real problem here is a lack of parental involvement. The idea that highly personal subjects such as sex and intimacy can be properly addressed by a state-mandated education course is utterly ludicrous.

Unfortunately, our culture tends to glorify and romanticize promiscuous lifestyles, even to the point of implying that abstinance is abnormal. Only parental involvement can counteract these messages.
Wow, the reads like a spinning top.
Parental involvement to suppress human nature-- good going pops.
Ben_n_austin is offline  
Old 05-01-2008   #11
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon88 View Post
Needs to trim his fingernails and shave. And the eyebrow. He's old man. It's over.


BrAinPaiNt is online now  
Old 05-01-2008   #12
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
Its the BBC anyway. You know anything on America will be put by them in the worst possible way.

You notice that they do not mention all the other problems they cannot blame on abstinence.
So you only focused on the source? There are several articles on this topic and I just grabbed one. It didn't matter to me that it was from the BBC. If I had posted another article not from the BBC, would it matter that much to you? Same numbers and opinions in those non-BBC articles.

Congress is holding hearings on these topics and whether to further fund these programs. They are deciding on what to do with tax dollars that you and I pay. Congress is not relying on anything from the BBC. They are quoting numerous different studies.
joseephuss is offline  
Old 05-01-2008   #13
ScipioCowboy
Convicted of Gnostical Turpitude
 
ScipioCowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jan 2007
Location:
Gatesville, Texa
Posts:
11,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben_n_austin View Post
Wow, the reads like a spinning top.
Parental involvement to suppress human nature-- good going pops.
I realize self-control can be a difficult task, but there are definitely some elements of human nature that should be suppressed...such as the urge to murder, for instance.

All things considered, I think my did pops did a good job.
ScipioCowboy is offline  
Old 05-01-2008   #14
Sasquatch
Lost in the Woods
 
Sasquatch's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Posts:
4,218
Default

Don't indulge in the pleasures of the flesh, kids.

There, problem solved.
Sasquatch is offline  
Old 05-01-2008   #15
ConcordCowboy
Mr. Buckeye
 
ConcordCowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Buckeye Nation
Posts:
12,746
Default

Teaching abstinence only in schools is going against these kids DNA and works as well as this time tested favorite...

ConcordCowboy is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com