Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2009 Archives > Political Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2008   #1
arglebargle
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,605
Default U.S. agents can seize travelers' laptops: report

Does this sound all right to you? A bit open ended and abuseable?


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. federal agents have been given new powers to seize travelers' laptops and other electronic devices at the border and hold them for unspecified periods the Washington Post reported on Friday.

Under recently disclosed Department of Homeland Security policies, such seizures may be carried out without suspicion of wrongdoing, the newspaper said, quoting policies issued on July 16 by two DHS agencies.

Agents are empowered to share the contents of seized computers with other agencies and private entities for data decryption and other reasons, the newspaper said.

DHS officials said the policies applied to anyone entering the country, including U.S. citizens, and were needed to prevent terrorism.

The measures have long been in place but were only disclosed in July, under pressure from civil liberties and business travel groups acting on reports that increasing numbers of international travelers had had their laptops, cellphones and other digital devices removed and examined.

The policies cover hard drives, flash drives, cell phones, iPods, pagers, beepers, and video and audio tapes -- as well as books, pamphlets and other written materials, the report said.

The policies require federal agents to take measures to protect business information and attorney-client privileged material. They stipulate that any copies of the data must be destroyed when a review is completed and no probable cause exists to keep the information.

(Reporting by Paul Eckert, editing by Alan Elsner)

http://www.reuters.com/article/techn...080801?sp=true
".... I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable." - Dwight D Eisenhower
arglebargle is offline  

Old 08-01-2008   #2
hairic
Senior Member
 
hairic's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Jun 2007
Posts:
2,294
Default

My guess is they're just setting up for another "comprimise" that will be hailed as this great achievement, just like what happened with FISA, to placate the masses. But what's really happening is the 4th amendment is just getting ****ed over.
hairic is offline  
Old 08-01-2008   #3
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,211
Default

Some of you seem to forget that the terrorists are pretty sophisticated anymore and they actually know how to use computers.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline  
Old 08-02-2008   #4
Ben_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Jul 2006
Location:
On the grill
Posts:
2,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hairic View Post
My guess is they're just setting up for another "comprimise" that will be hailed as this great achievement, just like what happened with FISA, to placate the masses. But what's really happening is the 4th amendment is just getting ****ed over.

I agree that it is getting pretty much squashed in favor of paranoid neo-con rhetorical meandering, which is like taking a on the Constitution.
Ben_n_austin is offline  
Old 08-02-2008   #5
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,211
Default

Sometimes I wonder what you libs use for brains sometimes.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline  
Old 08-02-2008   #6
hairic
Senior Member
 
hairic's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Jun 2007
Posts:
2,294
Default

I realize discussion with you is pointless, but if the boogeymen wanted to get information (digital) across the border, they don't have to carry a computer, any electronic device, any media, or any paper with language on it to achieve it. It's much more convenient to just avoid dealing with the security theater.
hairic is offline  
Old 08-02-2008   #7
arglebargle
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,605
Default

Yeah, it is not like these guys have never heard of cryptography. I bet they have good seamstressess who can sew microfilm into clothes! Lets seize suspicious clothing at the borders!

Hyperbole? Yes. It's just so weird seeing these self-proclaimed conservatives backing soviet era models for America.
'Do you have your papers??'
".... I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable." - Dwight D Eisenhower
arglebargle is offline  
Old 08-02-2008   #8
Ben_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Jul 2006
Location:
On the grill
Posts:
2,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hairic View Post
I realize discussion with you is pointless, but if the boogeymen wanted to get information (digital) across the border, they don't have to carry a computer, any electronic device, any media, or any paper with language on it to achieve it. It's much more convenient to just avoid dealing with the security theater.
Yep, like a zip drive or something like that. It's like every fear tactic ever played by neo-con crowd lends legitimate reason to violate fundamental rights.


They get sillier, and more paranoid, every day.
Ben_n_austin is offline  
Old 08-04-2008   #9
yeahyeah
Senior Member
 
yeahyeah's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2008
Posts:
502
Default

Laptops?? pfft. Thats nothing...suspension of Habeas Corpus, Wire taps...warrantless searches..they just ran out of stuff to take away.
yeahyeah is offline  
Old 08-04-2008   #10
Vintage
The Cult of Jib
 
Vintage's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2006
Location:
Jefferson-land
Posts:
11,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben_n_austin View Post
I agree that it is getting pretty much squashed in favor of paranoid neo-con rhetorical meandering, which is like taking a on the Constitution.

You mean, kinda like when your bretheren tried to squash the 2nd amendment, recently?

___________


Both suck. I wish I could exercise my 2nd amendment here and protect my property.

I'd shoot some mofos for sure if they tried to "confiscate" my property, in the name of "national security."



Jerry Jones: "I don't know when I've ever seen a player impress our staff without having played in a ball game any more than Matt Johnson."
Vintage is offline  
Old 08-04-2008   #11
sacase
Senior Member
 
sacase's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Alexandria, Virg
Posts:
4,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arglebargle View Post
Does this sound all right to you? A bit open ended and abuseable?


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. federal agents have been given new powers to seize travelers' laptops and other electronic devices at the border and hold them for unspecified periods the Washington Post reported on Friday.

Under recently disclosed Department of Homeland Security policies, such seizures may be carried out without suspicion of wrongdoing, the newspaper said, quoting policies issued on July 16 by two DHS agencies.

Agents are empowered to share the contents of seized computers with other agencies and private entities for data decryption and other reasons, the newspaper said.

DHS officials said the policies applied to anyone entering the country, including U.S. citizens, and were needed to prevent terrorism.

[View Full Quote]
So basically what you are saying is that customs does not have the right to search your baggage when you are coming though custroms, correct?
By what right? By What code? By what Standard? ~Atlas Shrugged

Check out my trip to Africa
sacase is offline  
Old 08-04-2008   #12
hairic
Senior Member
 
hairic's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Jun 2007
Posts:
2,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sacase View Post
So basically what you are saying is that customs does not have the right to search your baggage when you are coming though custroms, correct?
Yes. They can search it, but it can't be used in court. They need reasonable suspicion for more "intrusive" searches (e.g., they can't strip search every person coming over the border for no reason).

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200..._laptop_s.html
hairic is offline  
Old 08-04-2008   #13
sacase
Senior Member
 
sacase's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Alexandria, Virg
Posts:
4,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hairic View Post
Yes. They can search it, but it can't be used in court. They need reasonable suspicion for more "intrusive" searches (e.g., they can't strip search every person coming over the border for no reason).

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200..._laptop_s.html
Nothing is final, that will probably see the supreme court one day.

In my opinion I see it as the same thing as searching your bags. Your laptop is mearly a bag holding your information, pictures, music, etc. When you leave the country you are giving implied consent to search your bags on your return, at least in my view. This is coming from an African American Male age 20-35 who has traveled extensively overseas.
By what right? By What code? By what Standard? ~Atlas Shrugged

Check out my trip to Africa
sacase is offline  
Old 08-04-2008   #14
yeahyeah
Senior Member
 
yeahyeah's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2008
Posts:
502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sacase View Post
Nothing is final, that will probably see the supreme court one day.

In my opinion I see it as the same thing as searching your bags. Your laptop is mearly a bag holding your information, pictures, music, etc. When you leave the country you are giving implied consent to search your bags on your return, at least in my view. This is coming from an African American Male age 20-35 who has traveled extensively overseas.

What about your house? Your car? Your phone calls? Your friends and families'?
What about detaining you indefinitely on suspicion of terrorist plotting? No attorney..no hearing. They can do all that too ya know...and your congressman more than likely voted for it.
So..yeah..whats a laptop?

"The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over

Joseph Goebbels
yeahyeah is offline  
Old 08-04-2008   #15
sacase
Senior Member
 
sacase's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Alexandria, Virg
Posts:
4,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahyeah View Post
What about your house? Your car? Your phone calls? Your friends and families'?
What about detaining you indefinitely on suspicion of terrorist plotting? No attorney..no hearing. They can do all that too ya know...and your congressman more than likely voted for it.
So..yeah..whats a laptop?

"The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over

Joseph Goebbels
Well they can search your car if you take it out of the country. I would never take my house out the country since it is a bit to big. This is much ado about nothing.

I know all about what the Intelligence agencies can do, as that is my profession. As far as phone calls....don't call terrorists and people won't go looking at your phone calls.

You act like the FBI is just randomly going up to people and asking for their laptop computers at Starbucks.
By what right? By What code? By what Standard? ~Atlas Shrugged

Check out my trip to Africa
sacase is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com