This is my opinion

[OLDSCHOOL]

If he does not trust Lee, then why do we still have him on the team, we should have traded him when there was some interest in him, waive him something, just get him off the team and let him go somewhere else to see if he can make a living in this league. I mean if you cannot trust him then why hold up his career having him here standing on the sideline.

And while I'm on the cutting and waiving subject, Why in SAMHILL IS LYN SCOTT STILL ON THIS TEAM?

Can someone please answer that question for me?

[mullet]

i ask the same thing about Lee. Play or cut.

Lynn Scott is a litmus test. If he is on the team = no superbowl.

[Chuck 54]

Originally Posted by OLDSCHOOL

If he does not trust Lee, then why do we still have him on the team, we should have traded him when there was some interest in him, waive him something, just get him off the team and let him go somewhere else to see if he can make a living in this league. I mean if you cannot trust him then why hold up his career having him here standing on the sideline.

And while I'm on the cutting and waiving subject, Why in SAMHILL IS LYN SCOTT STILL ON THIS TEAM?

Can someone please answer that question for me?

I like seeing Scott in there over Dixon to be honest, but I don't see why we don't give the more athletic Davis a shot....again, these guys we have hope in must really stink more than we think, and that includes Henson.

[The Great Number 8]

Why do people equate not trusting Lee today with never trusting Lee? Obviously you keep him, because if he does catch on to the blitz pickups and the like, you've found yourself a terrific running back. Until then he's a work in progress. I think he's a perfect #3 back right now. Young guy, has some skill running the ball and learning to block, something he was likely never asked to do or coached to do in college, and some of the other finer points.

He's 24, missed all last year with an injury, so he's essentially a rookie. Why would they give up on him?