Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2009 Archives > Political Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 09-01-2008   #1
Bizwah
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
5,674
Default Questions for energy "experts"

I've been hearing a lot about natural gas in the news. It's been said that NG burns cleaner than oil.

I'm not quite sure how that works. Is it like propane? Is it a liquid fuel? How difficult would it be to change our cars over? How difficult would it be to change our gas stations to pump NG? Is NG even a viable alternative?

I also went and visited the pickensplan.com site. Anyone have the scoop on this guy?

I like the idea of harnessing wind. It makes sense....His whole plan seems to make sense. He appears to be an "all the above" guy when it comes to energy. That's my stance as well.

But with any person's plan, there has to be a flip side. Before I support any person's ideas, I want to know what the drawbacks are.

Can anyone give me a scoop on this guy?
Bizwah is offline  

Old 09-01-2008   #2
yeahyeah
Senior Member
 
yeahyeah's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2008
Posts:
502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizwah View Post
I've been hearing a lot about natural gas in the news. It's been said that NG burns cleaner than oil.

I'm not quite sure how that works. Is it like propane? Is it a liquid fuel? How difficult would it be to change our cars over? How difficult would it be to change our gas stations to pump NG? Is NG even a viable alternative?

I also went and visited the pickensplan.com site. Anyone have the scoop on this guy?

I like the idea of harnessing wind. It makes sense....His whole plan seems to make sense. He appears to be an "all the above" guy when it comes to energy. That's my stance as well.

But with any person's plan, there has to be a flip side. Before I support any person's ideas, I want to know what the drawbacks are.

Can anyone give me a scoop on this guy?
Yeah kinda..its mostly Methane..yeah its not that hard to convert vehicles..It burns alot cleaner and there is tons and tons of it that is actually vented off in the drilling process. Literally trillions of cubic feet.
The other stuff i dont know about man.
yeahyeah is offline  
Old 09-01-2008   #3
VietCowboy
Be Realistic. Demand the Impossible.
 
VietCowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2010, 2011
 
Joined:
Oct 2007
Location:
nashville
Posts:
2,901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizwah View Post
I've been hearing a lot about natural gas in the news. It's been said that NG burns cleaner than oil.

I'm not quite sure how that works. Is it like propane? Is it a liquid fuel? How difficult would it be to change our cars over? How difficult would it be to change our gas stations to pump NG? Is NG even a viable alternative?

I also went and visited the pickensplan.com site. Anyone have the scoop on this guy?

I like the idea of harnessing wind. It makes sense....His whole plan seems to make sense. He appears to be an "all the above" guy when it comes to energy. That's my stance as well.

But with any person's plan, there has to be a flip side. Before I support any person's ideas, I want to know what the drawbacks are.

Can anyone give me a scoop on this guy?
Honda's got a NG car, but very limited due to stations.
WANTED. NEEDED. DESTINED.



Go farther, Go further, Go harder. Is that not why we came? And if not, then why bother?
VietCowboy is offline  
Old 09-01-2008   #4
ThaBigP
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2007
Posts:
2,062
Default

From my understanding, NG vehicles have much less range simply as a factor of fuel density. NG is a gas (although compressed for such use), whereas gasoline and deisel are obviously liquid, so the same volume of the liquid fuels has much more energy stored in it.

As for wind, I heard a very interesting statistic that kinda throws cold water on the whole idea. The turbines cost more money than they recoup by producing electricity. Currently, it takes about 20 years or so to recover the cost of the turbines, but they must be replaced much sooner than that. Only government subsidies are making it a viable option. So in effect, we're footing the bill (through taxes) to pay for a technology that walks backwards in terms of return on material investment. Perhaps that will change in time, but the disparity is quite large.
Professor of Philosphy: "Only a fool is certain of anything".

Student: "You sound pretty certain of that, sir".
ThaBigP is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com