Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2009 Archives > Political Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 10-06-2008   #1
Heisenberg
Pow! Pow!
 
Heisenberg's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Seattle, WA
Posts:
8,637
Send a message via ICQ to Heisenberg Send a message via AIM to Heisenberg
Default Keating Inquiry Appears Different, 17 Years Later

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the...rs_differ.html

Keating Inquiry Appears Different, 17 Years Later

Updated 2:56 p.m.
By Michael D. Shear
Sometimes in politics, memories fail.

In a conference call with reporters, attorney John Dowd was asked about a specific part of the Keating Five inquiry, the fact that Cindy McCain and her father had invested in a Keating strip mall.

"It was part of the inquiry, but it did not -- John was unconnected to that and unaware of it at the time, and did not participate in it," Dowd said.

But thanks to the quick research skills of Democratic partisans, here's John McCain's answer to an attorney who asked him about that very investment during the ethics committee hearings in 1991.

"Sometime in 1986, I was told by Mr. Delgado, who was Executive Vice President of my father-in-law's company, that they were going to invest in a shopping center and that the investment -- the project -- was being put together by a subsidiary of American Continental," McCain said. "He later told me that they -- that that had happened. And I had no interest in it and just noted in passing that this investment took place."

The attorney asking the question during the hearing? John Dowd.
Heisenberg is offline  

Old 10-06-2008   #2
ThaBigP
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2007
Posts:
2,062
Default

[FONT='Times New Roman'][FONT=Verdana]Robert Bennett, the Democrat lawyer serving as special council to the Senate Ethics Committee investigating the Keating five, wanted Senators McCain and John Glenn removed from the investigation since they had obviously done nothing wrong (after over a year of investigation). The ethics committee would not release them from the (then) upcoming hearings. And the reason they told him McCain specifically would never be released from hearings? They did not want to begin public hearings where all the defendants were Democrats. They wanted a "bi-partisan" group of defendants. So in effect McCain was dragged into that mess as an act of political affirmative action. He was the "token" Republican. That was pretty much what Bennett was told by the Ethics Committee.[/FONT][/FONT]
Professor of Philosphy: "Only a fool is certain of anything".

Student: "You sound pretty certain of that, sir".
ThaBigP is offline  
Old 10-07-2008   #3
SuspectCorner
Romosexual
 
SuspectCorner's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009
 
Joined:
May 2004
Location:
UNDERtheBUS, TX
Posts:
7,480
Default

McCain was rebuked for exhibiting "poor judgment"... but throw a white hat on him.
SuspectCorner is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com