Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-22-2009   #16
SLATEmosphere
Banned
 
Joined:
Jan 2009
Location:
In Peppy's head
Posts:
9,633
Default

The NFL constantly evolves. Those hard hitting safetys are becoming more and more obsolete due to different schemes and packages. There's only a few rare exeptions that come along who can do both. Polamalu, Bob Sanders and Sean Taylor.
SLATEmosphere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009   #17
ThreeSportStar80
Banned
 
ThreeSportStar80's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Location:
Mid Atlantic
Posts:
27,093
Default

Roy Williams isn't getting paid like a part time player... They need to cut him and move on. Dallas needs a leader and a playmaker at the safety position.
ThreeSportStar80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009   #18
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
US
Posts:
26,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLATEmosphere View Post
We save 2.2 million if he's cut or traded.I think it's saving 10 million over the next two years or something crazy like that if he's cut this year.
If he's traded then we save all the contract money. This would be a very good thing but who's going to take him?

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi View Post
I've been saying it for 3 years, back when everyone was blaming the scheme.

And NFL safety these days has to cover. It doesn't matter if he's free or strong. It's a fact that you can't scheme/wish/hope/pray away. The game is too spread out now and there's too many athletic pass catching TE's. NFL offensive coordinators are paid a lot of money to figure out ways to get safeties like Roy Williams in mismatches. There's nowhere to hide.
We caught some heat for that. The game has changed. We play the nickel, dime and other special packages a great deal of the time. The rule changes and the natural evolution of players gives makes passing much more effective.
jobberone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009   #19
Clove
Shrinkage
 
Clove's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
34,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
If he still lit people up it would be a different story but he doesnt even do that.
He would have a place on my roster if he would destroy every WR within 10 yards of him, but since his one act is gone, he should follow.
Clove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009   #20
Cowboyz88
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
2,938
Default

Isn't there a myth list somewhere that disputes this bunk?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
"The safety position is becoming more and more a corner position in the NFL,'' Belichick said. "There was a time when some of the safeties, particularly the strong safeties, fit more almost like linebackers than they did as defensive backs. That's changed gradually, but now to the point where the defensive backs a lot of times have to cover either wide receivers or tight ends who are very, very good in the passing game. So the demands of that position have changed and we have to change the evaluation of them.
I kid, I kid.
Cowboyz88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #21
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,586
Default

I think we missed Roy a bit in run support this year. Chances are he doesn't blow both tackles like Hamlin did on those two huge runs against the Ravens, but the money he's making is a little ridiculous considering he's not an every down player.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #22
Sam I Am
Unfriendly and Aloof!
 
Sam I Am's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2006
Location:
Betelgeuse
Posts:
30,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
Frankly I see a time when you have 3 CBs starting and only 1 Safety.
...and that safety will be a big physical free safety playing the SS position.
Formerly the notorious nyc!

I've got more red flags than Soviet Russia!

There is a good chance that you don't like me, but there is a better chance that I don't care.

If I'm not insulting you, I'm probably not aware that you exist.



Jerry Jones in the draft room is suicide on the football field. The line of scrimmage is EVERYTHING. Something Jerry doesn't understand.
Sam I Am is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #23
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddh33 View Post
You know, it's kind of strange that college football has been a little ahead of the NFL lately.

Colleges were doing a lot of this several years ago, including when Roy Williams was playing a hybrid position at OU.

More recently, colleges are going almost exclusively to spread offenses, and we are gradually seeing more and more of that in the NFL too.
It's a trickle up effect. The NFL is almost forced to adopt more spread offenses, because all of the coaching and player talent infusing into the league from college and high school come from spread offenses. Eventually the NFL coaches have to make the best of what they have to work with, and now that's players who have played in spread offenses. You don't see many fullbacks coming out of college because they aren't implemented in the spread. I was reading a quote by an NFL general manager the other day lamenting that it's impossible to find all around TE's coming from college, because they're all 235-240 lbs. TE/WR hybrids who play spread out from the line of scrimmage. Chan Gailey had to implement the spread last year in Kansas City because it was an offense Tyler Thigpen knew from college.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.

Last edited by InmanRoshi : 02-23-2009 at 01:24 PM.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #24
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,829
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLATEmosphere View Post
The NFL constantly evolves. Those hard hitting safetys are becoming more and more obsolete due to different schemes and packages. There's only a few rare exeptions that come along who can do both. Polamalu, Bob Sanders and Sean Taylor.
All of whom get burned as much as Roy.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #25
tyke1doe
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Southeast, Unite
Posts:
17,490
Send a message via AIM to tyke1doe
Default

Belichick is trying to psyche us out. If the Cowboys cut Roy, the Patriots will pick him up and turn him into a monster again.
"Jason Garrett will have the Cowboys in the NFC Championship Game within three years." - Tyke1doe, August 19, 2011
tyke1doe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #26
Disturbed
A Mere Flesh Wound
 
Disturbed's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
1,407
Default

Belicheck takes players who perform on the field, so he won't be foolish enough to consider Roy Williams.

And I think we will see larger CB playing and ultimately teams will have 3 or 4 starting in the secondary...the current safety is obsolete.
Disturbed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #27
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Future View Post
All of whom get burned as much as Roy.
and get payed a lot less to do it while getting the same results....


Like I said if he still blew people up then every part of his game would improve because he makes players play timid and do things slower.

I seriously wonder if he was on steroids at OU and once he got to the league the results he had from it only lasted so long.
CATCH17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2009   #28
Rampage
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2006
Location:
New York
Posts:
24,117
Default

no reason he should be on the cowboys roster next season.
Rampage is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com