Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-10-2009   #16
SLATEmosphere
Banned
 
Joined:
Jan 2009
Location:
In Peppy's head
Posts:
9,633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41gy# View Post
I always forget Chip Vaugn. He's rated right behind Moore. Bunting has him at number 81. He's faster than Moore. He ran a 4.42, I think.
Get off the Vaughn and Moore train please. They have good straightline speed, but terrible game and lateral speed.
SLATEmosphere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009   #17
5mics
Next Year's Champions
 
5mics's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
H-Town...
Posts:
1,822
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLATEmosphere View Post
With the addition of Sensabaugh and now Scandrick playing some "star"..is it safe to say that we won't be picking Delmas or Chung now??
I'm thinking not necessarily anymore; which is fine w/ me cuz I prefer a NT w/ our 2nd rounder.....
2011 Cowboys modus operandi :

5mics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #18
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLATEmosphere View Post
With the addition of Sensabaugh and now Scandrick playing some "star"..is it safe to say that we won't be picking Delmas or Chung now??
I wouldn't... I'd draft a safety, but not that early...

Unless William Moore falls that far, I think he might be a good gamble on greatness... but right now, I'd like the Boys to go OL with the 2nd round pick... if either Duke Robinson or Alex Mack fell that far, they'd be perfect for the Boys...

From what I'm reading, my pet cat is falling down the charts, because he's not yet ready to work out after suffering a knee injury... that would be Jonathan Casillas, the 6-1, 225 pound OLB from Wisconsin who runs a sub-4.5 40 when healthy... I think that Casillas' size and speed are reminiscent of a young Darren Woodson (who also made the switch from OLB to S in the pros), and he might even be available in the 5th round, though I'd spend the Boys second 4th rounder on him...
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #19
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLATEmosphere View Post
I'm really leaning towards a WR now too..Nicks or Robiskie would look awfully tempting..
For WR, I'm targeting Jarett Dillard, Quan Cosby or Johnny Knox in the middle rounds... Jarett was a touchdown machine in college, setting an NCAA record for WRs with 60 TDs... Cosby has good speed, is fearless, a willing blocker, and a capable kick returner... Knox is blazing fast, and the Boys can use some more speed at WR...

The common thread with all of them is that they're smaller WRs, with the quickness to play in the slot... the Boys have a ton of big wideouts, it might be advantageous to add a Smurf who can play some...
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #20
dallasfaniac
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Las Vegas, NV
Posts:
4,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbear View Post
Jarett was a touchdown machine in college, setting an NCAA record for WRs with 60 TDs.
I'm still trying to decide what I think of this kid. On a scale of David Ball to Jerry Rice, where would I rank him kind of thing.
dallasfaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #21
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasfaniac View Post
I'm still trying to decide what I think of this kid. On a scale of David Ball to Jerry Rice, where would I rank him kind of thing.
I see him as a solid slot receiver in the NFL, and he'd probably be best served by going to a team that runs the West Coast offense...
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #22
dallasfaniac
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Las Vegas, NV
Posts:
4,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbear View Post
I see him as a solid slot receiver in the NFL, and he'd probably be best served by going to a team that runs the West Coast offense...
I like Dillard, I'm just overly cautious I guess. David White Rice Ball broke Jerry Rice's TD record in 2006 and had a slow time in the 40, going undrafted when many sites had him projected him around a 5th rounder. Dillard breaks David Ball's record by 2, also had a slow 40 time at the combine and projects to round 3-4.

I like Dillard who should make a roster rather than dropping out in the CFL as well as the other guys on your list, but I would add Mike Thomas, who is my personal favorite. He may climb into the 2nd as he puts up the good numbers, performed well in both East-West and SeniorBowl and had terrific performance at the combine. The only knock is his 5'-8", which might mean not being seen with 6'-7" OL in the way in the NFL.
dallasfaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #23
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasfaniac View Post
I like Dillard, I'm just overly cautious I guess. David White Rice Ball broke Jerry Rice's TD record in 2006 and had a slow time in the 40, going undrafted when many sites had him projected him around a 5th rounder. Dillard breaks David Ball's record by 2, also had a slow 40 time at the combine and projects to round 3-4.
Uhhh, a 4.52 40 isn't especially fast, but it's not slow either... that's what Dillard ran at the Combine, and I'm betting he gets it down into the 4.48-4.49 range at his Pro Day workout...

Ball ran a 4.65... big difference...

Quote:
I like Dillard who should make a roster rather than dropping out in the CFL as well as the other guys on your list, but I would add Mike Thomas, who is my personal favorite. He may climb into the 2nd as he puts up the good numbers, performed well in both East-West and SeniorBowl and had terrific performance at the combine. The only knock is his 5'-8", which might mean not being seen with 6'-7" OL in the way in the NFL.
That's the thing, I think Thomas goes before I'd look at a WR... Hos sold me on him, but I have other plans for the 2nd and 3rd round picks...
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #24
Yeagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yeagermeister's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
47,533
Default

Yes, Scandrick isn't moving to safety Ball is. That should last all of one day.
RIP Weldon "Pops" Parkhill....I will miss you my friend
R.I.P. Renee I miss you sis
Yeagermeister is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #25
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,303
Default

Sensabaugh was signed to a one year deal to buy time for a rookie.

We will still draft a safety but it may not be in round 2. It will be the earliest spot where we get good value.

Its not like we signed Sensabaugh to a 5 year deal.
But I still don't know what any team saw Thursday night that would have made them comfortable with waiting a round or two for the offensive lineman they wanted. ---Todd McShay
We just converted half our LB to DL. We have a 30m starting DL, it better be pretty friggin good.
jterrell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #26
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbear View Post
Uhhh, a 4.52 40 isn't especially fast, but it's not slow either... that's what Dillard ran at the Combine, and I'm betting he gets it down into the 4.48-4.49 range at his Pro Day workout...

Ball ran a 4.65... big difference...



That's the thing, I think Thomas goes before I'd look at a WR... Hos sold me on him, but I have other plans for the 2nd and 3rd round picks...
I can assure you Mike Thomas does not get drafted before round 4.

Thomas is a Skyler Green type player without the injury concerns. He doesn't look very natural at all at WR. Dillard is a vastly better WR and prospect.
But I still don't know what any team saw Thursday night that would have made them comfortable with waiting a round or two for the offensive lineman they wanted. ---Todd McShay
We just converted half our LB to DL. We have a 30m starting DL, it better be pretty friggin good.
jterrell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #27
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,957
Default

I've seen Chung going anywhere between early 2nd all the way us in the 3rd. I say we stick to our board at this point and take the BPA approach according to our board--which takes into account our needs.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #28
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbear View Post
For WR, I'm targeting Jarett Dillard, Quan Cosby or Johnny Knox in the middle rounds... Jarett was a touchdown machine in college, setting an NCAA record for WRs with 60 TDs... Cosby has good speed, is fearless, a willing blocker, and a capable kick returner... Knox is blazing fast, and the Boys can use some more speed at WR...

The common thread with all of them is that they're smaller WRs, with the quickness to play in the slot... the Boys have a ton of big wideouts, it might be advantageous to add a Smurf who can play some...
I agree with this post on all accounts. If we can get any of those three without reaching, I would be happy. Middle rounds should work if that is where they are on our draft boards. Jarett is a real playmaker with great hands and hops and so-so speed. Cosby reminds me a little of Hines Ward. Knox is jsut a flat our burner.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #29
jday
Senior Member
 
jday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLATEmosphere View Post
With the addition of Sensabaugh and now Scandrick playing some "star"..is it safe to say that we won't be picking Delmas or Chung now??
I'm not sure how everyone is ignoring our drastic need at CB at this point. With the release of Pacman, the trade of Anthony Henry, and the possible transition of Scandrick, that leaves us with only 2 starter quality CB's; Ball should not have even made the 53 roster over Oglesby, but that's for a different thread. Nevertheless, with all the teams moving to the 3-4, I still say the Cowboys address Safety, but a 3-4 ready NT or hybrid in the Ratliff mold, should come first, then CB, then we can probably address Safety and ILB both in the 4th round.
jday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #30
Sitting Bull
Senior Member
 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Years Donated
2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Scottsdale, AZ
Posts:
1,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jday View Post
I'm not sure how everyone is ignoring our drastic need at CB at this point. With the release of Pacman, the trade of Anthony Henry, and the possible transition of Scandrick, that leaves us with only 2 starter quality CB's; Ball should not have even made the 53 roster over Oglesby, but that's for a different thread. Nevertheless, with all the teams moving to the 3-4, I still say the Cowboys address Safety, but a 3-4 ready NT or hybrid in the Ratliff mold, should come first, then CB, then we can probably address Safety and ILB both in the 4th round.
I agree, CB is a draft need on par with S, OL and LB. But it still depends on what we do with Killa and FA. We're almost in position to really take BPA. Between Chung, Byrd and Unger, I'm feeling Oregon could figure in to our first pick.
Sitting Bull is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com