Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2009 Archives > Political Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-16-2009   #1
JBond
Senior Member
 
JBond's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Land of the free
Posts:
6,596
Default MSNBC makes deal with Napolitano; Only allowed 1 question on extremism report...


With all the FOX bashing going on, I thought I would remind everyone why MSNBC is in the bag for Obama and in the toilet ratings wise.

MSNBC makes deal with Napolitano; Only allowed 1 question on extremism report...

The GOPers - by that we mean Rep. Eric Cantor's office - are pouncing on an interview today on "Morning Joe" with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, under this subject line: "Administration Permits Only One Question, No Follow-Ups About Extremism Report."

Today the Secretary went on Morning Joe but they were only allowed to ask one question.

"Apparently, when the Democrats promise an open administration, they really only mean open as long as you ask the questions they want asked and no follow-ups on controversial topics that everyone is reporting on," staffer Joe Pounder wrote in an email.

Anyway check out the transcript:

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough: “I want to have a discussion afterwards about that interview.”

MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski: “Now, we should be clear, they only wanted one question.”

Scarborough: “Yeah. So this morning, I got a call that she [Janet Napolitano] was going to be on the show and they said we could only ask one question …”

Brzezinski: “That was the agreement.”

Scarborough: “…about this story yesterday. And I initially said, well, we're not going to do it then, because we don't allow people to tell us what they're going to talk about.”

Brzezinski: “Right.”

Scarborough: “I said, we'll ask one question, see how she responds and since this Mexico issue is so huge, we want our viewers to watch. If she was coming on to, you know, name a new post office that would have been something or a book that would have been – but I want – let's talk about that afterwards.”

Brzezinski: “Okay.”

Scarborough: “We'll ask our audience whether we should have had her on the show or not under those conditions.”

Brzezinski: “Okay, because I actually – I have so many follow-ups.”

Scarborough: “I had a lot of follow-ups.”
JBond is offline  

Old 04-16-2009   #2
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,211
Default

Is anyone really surprised?
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #3
JBond
Senior Member
 
JBond's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Land of the free
Posts:
6,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
Is anyone really surprised?
With the way the leftist jumped on FOX for covering major protests you would think they would be as upset about MSNBC being in the bag for Obama. I read many complaints about bias by FOX. Now that it is MSNBC we get nothing.

Well at least they are predictable.
JBond is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #4
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,836
Default

If anything I would think this would be an example to counter the in the bag idea of MSNBC.

If they were so in the bag with team Obama, one would think they could ask as many questions at they wanted about this in order to give the guest ample chances to spread their views on it.

So I would imagine most read it and figured...meh.

<cue burms inane ramblings in 3...2...>


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #5
Cajuncowboy
Preacher From The Black Lagoon
 
Cajuncowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
State of Grace
Posts:
27,478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt View Post
If anything I would think this would be an example to counter the in the bag idea of MSNBC.

If they were so in the bag with team Obama, one would think they could ask as many questions at they wanted about this in order to give the guest ample chances to spread their views on it.

So I would imagine most read it and figured...meh.

<cue burms inane ramblings in 3...2...>
Oh please.... This is like this person interviewing Terrell Owens to find out what happened with the pills...



For a great free bible study tool check out http://www.e-sword.net

"Those who would deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves..."-Abraham Lincoln
Cajuncowboy is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #6
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy View Post
Oh please.... This is like this person interviewing Terrell Owens to find out what happened with the pills...

You don't follow logic well do you.


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #7
Cajuncowboy
Preacher From The Black Lagoon
 
Cajuncowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
State of Grace
Posts:
27,478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt View Post
You don't follow logic well do you.
Sure I do.

You think MSNBC is being UNBIASED by asking their one little question and being done with it.

Logically, you're crazy. But then a gain, you've never denied that.


For a great free bible study tool check out http://www.e-sword.net

"Those who would deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves..."-Abraham Lincoln
Cajuncowboy is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #8
Jarv
Loud pipes saves lives.
 
Jarv's Avatar
Years Donated
2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Jarvland, CT
Posts:
6,846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt View Post
You don't follow logic well do you.
Dude, if they were unbiased they would have declined the interview because of the restrictions. What has happened to your brain, brain ? They just followed the party line and said ok...but we don't like it...lol. Yeah right.
Be excellent to each other....
Jarv is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #9
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajuncowboy View Post
Sure I do.

You think MSNBC is being UNBIASED by asking their one little question and being done with it.

Logically, you're crazy. But then a gain, you've never denied that.
Umm...No that is not what I think nor what I conveyed. So I guess my question to you about logic is answered.


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #10
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarv View Post
Dude, if they were unbiased they would have declined the interview because of the restrictions. What has happened to your brain, brain ? They just followed the party line and said ok...but we don't like it...lol. Yeah right.
At least you have a logical retort instead of some obama obession hate msnbc type of retort...so Kudos to you.

What you said makes sense, they should have turned it down with those conditions. Does not make them biased, in this case, that they did not. It makes them a news channel taking whatever bone they can get in this case.

NOT SAYING that msnbc is not biased...before someone rips their sphincter trying to reply saying that.


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #11
JBond
Senior Member
 
JBond's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Land of the free
Posts:
6,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt View Post
If anything I would think this would be an example to counter the in the bag idea of MSNBC.

If they were so in the bag with team Obama, one would think they could ask as many questions at they wanted about this in order to give the guest ample chances to spread their views on it.

So I would imagine most read it and figured...meh.

<cue burms inane ramblings in 3...2...>
So back under the Bush days, if FOX said we are going to limit our questions about the Patriot Act to one, you would have had the same response? I am not sure you would have. But then again you are not the one being targeted. They are targeting recent veterans, people that believe in states rights and legal immigration. I am pretty sure you do not fall under any of those categories or you would be a little more upset, like back in the Patriot Act days.
JBond is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #12
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBond View Post
So back under the Bush days, if FOX said we are going to limit our questions about the Patriot Act to one, you would have had the same response? I am not sure you would have. But then again you are not the one being targeted. They are targeting recent veterans, people that believe in states rights and legal immigration. I am pretty sure you do not fall under any of those categories or you would be a little more upset, like back in the Patriot Act days.
You assume too much.


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #13
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,211
Default

Brain is incapeable of admitting that MSNBC was clearly in the tank and has been and nothing has changed. He is still making excuses for them.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #14
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
Brain is incapeable of admitting that MSNBC was clearly in the tank and has been and nothing has changed. He is still making excuses for them.
Your inane ramblings took longer than I expected, but you could still be counted on to be the GOP bot you normally are in here.


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 04-16-2009   #15
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,211
Default

And you are the new Obama bot. Pot meet kettle.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com