
|
04-17-2009
|
#1
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
why can't Mike Thomas be Steve Smith?
both are short, stocky WRs, but Mike Thomas had better workout numbers than Steve Smith did coming out, better vert, better broad-jump, better 10-yard, better everything, yet all the pubs say that he can't challenge deep
Steve Smith was also projected to go in the 2nd/3rd round, and wasn't in the tier 1 of WRs in his class
so why can't Mike Thomas be like Steve Smith?
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Feb 2008 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 16,913 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryAdvocate
both are short, stocky WRs, but Mike Thomas had better workout numbers than Steve Smith did coming out, better vert, better broad-jump, better 10-yard, better everything, yet all the pubs say that he can't challenge deep
Steve Smith was also projected to go in the 2nd/3rd round, and wasn't in the tier 1 of WRs in his class
so why can't Mike Thomas be like Steve Smith?
|
You never know. On paper he could...and I like Thomas. Still, I give him a 5% chance--which is pretty good given Smith's skill level. 
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#3
|
|
Run-loving Dino
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | 1-star thread |
Posts: | 32,047 |
|
He could. But shorter WRs are always going to be lower-rated, no matter how many times guys like Smith and Moss show that shorter guys can kill.
Ivy League
Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Las Vegas, NV |
Posts: | 4,197 |
|
I really like Thomas and would be happy to see him in Dallas. I think he will make it into the 3rd and could possibly see late 2nd but with this deep WR class who knows.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#5
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
what I'm talking about is Steve Smith is considered a deep threat while people are writing off Thomas ever being that, when he's got just as good long-speed and leaping ability
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#6
|
|
Hawaiian Cowboy
Years Donated 2007, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 3,594 |
|
I would be ecstatic if we got Thomas with our 3 or 4. I think he'll be a steal. His quickness is unreal and he's got great hands.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Las Vegas, NV |
Posts: | 4,197 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryAdvocate
what I'm talking about is Steve Smith is considered a deep threat while people are writing off Thomas ever being that, when he's got just as good long-speed and leaping ability
|
There are two questions scouts had about Mike Thomas. First, his size. Second, Arizona's spread offense. I think they were answered with great combine numbers and standing out at both the Senior and Shrine bowls.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
I'd like him in the 3rd.
He's got great speed as well.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#9
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Location: | New York |
Posts: | 10,408 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryAdvocate
both are short, stocky WRs, but Mike Thomas had better workout numbers than Steve Smith did coming out, better vert, better broad-jump, better 10-yard, better everything, yet all the pubs say that he can't challenge deep
Steve Smith was also projected to go in the 2nd/3rd round, and wasn't in the tier 1 of WRs in his class
so why can't Mike Thomas be like Steve Smith?
|
He can.
Like you said. Steve Smith wasn't 'Steve Smith' when he first got into the NFL.
All of these rookie WR's will have to put in a lot of work to become solid pros and that includes Crabtree.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 11,355 |
|
Not to mention excellent PR guy. Fills two holes, stretch the field and special teams.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 27,834 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12
Not to mention excellent PR guy. Fills two holes, stretch the field and special teams.
|
i thought steve smith was faster than mike thomas
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Las Vegas, NV |
Posts: | 4,197 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyjoe
i thought steve smith was faster than mike thomas
|
Steve Smith's fastest ever 40 was 4.38. Thomas' official combine time was 4.4 (4.3 unofficial). Smith is about an inch taller and weighs 10 pounds less. Smith was drafted to be a returner but proved people wrong, the jury is still out on Thomas. I think he'll be good but it's all up to him.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 27,834 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasfaniac
Steve Smith's fastest ever 40 was 4.38. Thomas' official combine time was 4.4 (4.3 unofficial). Smith is about an inch taller and weighs 10 pounds less. Smith was drafted to be a returner but proved people wrong, the jury is still out on Thomas. I think he'll be good but it's all up to him.
|
cool thanks dallas
i thought steve smith was faster;
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#14
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Jan 2009 |
Location: | In Peppy's head |
Posts: | 9,633 |
|
I think Mike Thomas can very much be like Steve Smith. I remember When Steve came out of Utah being very raw and just simply being a speedy guy. I really hope we take him..worst case scenario..he's a solid punt returner.
|
|
|
04-17-2009
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2004 |
Location: | Right behind you |
Posts: | 5,089 |
|
i like Thomas a lot, would be my pick as we need some speed and we need a PR/KR. I'd still take another WR like Wallace, Iglesias, Dillard, Barden, or Knox.
Still left to accomplish:
sign OT Winston or G Moore
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.
|