I wouldn't blame you if you don't believe me but... - Page 3 - Dallas Cowboys Forum

TRIPLETS · 02-26-2005

HAHA!!!!!!!!

Unforgiven · 02-26-2005

It might be designed to get rid of Dat's salary. I don't know his cap number, but he might be thrown into the deal to get rid of his salary and give Parcell an opportunity to get a bigger MLB.

Hostile · 02-26-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unforgiven

It might be designed to get rid of Dat's salary. I don't know his cap number, but he might be thrown into the deal to get rid of his salary and give Parcell an opportunity to get a bigger MLB.

Seeing your sig line always makes my day.

Nerm · 02-26-2005

I think the key words are that the Raiders proposed this, not that Dallas would do it.

I could see this if the Boys were considering cutting Dat, but the way BP talked about him last year, I doubt that.

Even so, Woodson wants major $. He is a good (not great) CB, but he will be expensive. I would hate to see any 1st round pick sent for a guy that will also take up a lot of cap space. I would rather overspend on a good free agent CB.

Heck, you could sign an old guy like Law AND take a CB at #11 to cover your bases. Or you could give up a lesser pick for a guy like Surtain.

It is a bad idea on many levels. It just sounds made up, because it is so lopsided. The Raiders don't have a lot of leverage with Woodson, he sould come at a discount in a trade.

SoCalRaider · 02-26-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nerm

I think the key words are that the Raiders proposed this, not that Dallas would do it.

Really... according to TSN radio, they made it sound like the Cowboys offered this to the Raiders... this is getting kind of interesting.

The30YardSlant · 02-26-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCalRaider

Really... according to TSN radio, they made it sound like the Cowboys offered this to the Raiders... this is getting kind of interesting.

Now you are just making things up

JackMagist · 02-26-2005

If this is true we are getting raped as bad as the Deadskins got raped in the Bailey / Portis deal. Worse even since Portis was healthy and Woodson is not (and hasn't been for a couple of years).

TRIPLETS · 02-26-2005

LLLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR RRRRRRRR !

montgod · 02-26-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nerm

I think the key words are that the Raiders proposed this, not that Dallas would do it....

It is a bad idea on many levels. It just sounds made up, because it is so lopsided. The Raiders don't have a lot of leverage with Woodson, he sould come at a discount in a trade.

My sentiments exactly

lkelly · 02-26-2005

That trade sounds nauseating. When you can sign a player like Smoot or Lucas for no compensation, why would you trade a high pick and a defensive starter for a CB?

Offseason disaster if that projected trade goes down.

Tuna Helper · 02-26-2005

Jerry and Al Davis are good friends.

Davis is in cap hell, and Jerry can rescue him. Davis is in a pickle more than Jerry is. Jerry has his pick of the litter when it comes to FA CBs. Why would he do Davis a favor by trading away a 1st round pick AND getting him out of cap hell?

Jerry will not give up more than a 2nd round pick for Woodson. Book it!

Jerry has learned that trading away 1st round draft picks is not a good recipe for success.

dbair1967 · 02-26-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyMoss84

My Dad was listening to ESPN radio and my Dad was telling me that (I am deaf) they just confirmed that a possible deal between the Cowboys and Raiders might have a possible deal that the Raiders will send Charles Woodson to the Cowboys for the Cowboys #11 pick and Dat Nyugen but if this deal does actually happen, the Cowboys would have been robbed but it would have been more sense if the Cowboys sent the #20 pick and Dat Nyugen instead of the #11 pick. It could happen as soon as the end of today and early tomorrow.

If you say I'm a liar or whatever, fine, I'm just letting you know.

its not that I dont believe you or anything...but it wont happen, not under those parameters

David

HeHateMe · 02-26-2005

Not likely.

Especially with the all of the available FREE agents out there.

TRIPLETS · 02-26-2005

i love that sig hehateme,it reminds me of the first time i KNEW "this kid is 4 real."

Boom · 02-26-2005

So all the talk about the new contact rules makes us not want a CB early in the draft, yet we'll gladly trade our first pick plus a defensive starter? I smell something.