
|
12-06-2010
|
#1
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
The Draft Order After Week 13
1-11
1. Panthers
2-10
2. Lions
3. Bengals
4. Bills
3-9
5. Cardinals
6. Broncos
4-8
7. 49ers
8. Cowboys
5-7
9. Titans
10. Redskins
11. Texans
12. Vikings
13. Browns
6-6
14. Rams
15. Chargers
16. Raiders
17. Seahawks
18. Colts
19. Dolphins
7-5
20. Jaguars
21. Buccaneers
8-4
22. Chiefs
23. Giants
24. Ravens
25. Eagles
26. Packers
9-3
27. Saints
28. Bears
29. Jets
30. Steelers
10-2
31. Patriots
32. Falcons
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Location: | Franklin Square |
Posts: | 3,450 |
|
If we keep on winning we might not pick until the teens. 
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,713 |
|
Statistically Speaking .....
While unlikely, it is possible for us to draft anywhere from #1 overall, up to the last 8 win team (currently #26), unless the stars were to align, we make the playoffs and win the sb in which we would draft in slot #32. I'm not being a ********, just showing how huge a difference 4 weeks can make.
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,713 |
|
thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
1-11
1. Panthers
2-10
2. Lions
3. Bengals
4. Bills
3-9
5. Cardinals
6. Broncos
4-8
7. 49ers
8. Cowboys
5-7
9. Titans
10. Redskins
11. Texans
12. Vikings
13. Browns
6-6
14. Rams
15. Chargers
16. Raiders
17. Seahawks
18. Colts
19. Dolphins
7-5
20. Jaguars
21. Buccaneers
8-4
22. Chiefs
23. Giants
24. Ravens
25. Eagles
26. Packers
9-3
27. Saints
28. Bears
29. Jets
30. Steelers
10-2
31. Patriots
32. Falcons
|
Thanks for the update on our current position. Realistically, if we continue to play well, I could see us catching the teams that are 6 and 6 now pretty easily, giving us a draft position in the mid teens. I personally think that since the playoffs are all but statistically out of reach, I think the team would be better served getting a draft pick in the top 8 teams rather than winning 4 more meaningless games and drafting as low as the early 20's.
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2010 |
Posts: | 1,113 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict
Thanks for the update on our current position. Realistically, if we continue to play well, I could see us catching the teams that are 6 and 6 now pretty easily, giving us a draft position in the mid teens. I personally think that since the playoffs are all but statistically out of reach, I think the team would be better served getting a draft pick in the top 8 teams rather than winning 4 more meaningless games and drafting as low as the early 20's.
|
No one wants a top five pick. Every year the team's at the top of the draft try to trade down. It's too much money. Premo picks start at about the 8-9th spot down through the mid to late teens.
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#6
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 11,667 |
|
Well, look at it his way. We are trading down a few spots and in the process picking up a coach the players believe in.
Wouldnt you trade the #8th pick overall for the #15th and a top coach?
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 3,453 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict
Thanks for the update on our current position. Realistically, if we continue to play well, I could see us catching the teams that are 6 and 6 now pretty easily, giving us a draft position in the mid teens. I personally think that since the playoffs are all but statistically out of reach, I think the team would be better served getting a draft pick in the top 8 teams rather than winning 4 more meaningless games and drafting as low as the early 20's.
|
No frickin' way. Give me four more wins. I HATE losing. Running the table will do more for this team than being a few slots higher in the draft.
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2008 |
Location: | Fayetteville, AR |
Posts: | 941 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VACowboy
No frickin' way. Give me four more wins. I HATE losing. Running the table will do more for this team than being a few slots higher in the draft.
|
I hate losing too, but this team needs some Patrick Peterson.
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
I love that we're winning. It'll work out better this way for the draft as well, because we'll likely be picking in a spot that we can get a LT/RT at the right value. Which, as much as we want a flashy big name CB, is our TRUE need
Everybody wanting to lose to get a top flight player is backwards, IMO. Why would you want to get an elite player? To help your team win games. So why would you want to lose games to get that player? How does that make any sense? Winning is winning, I don't care about the playoffs. I watch my football team to see them win games, not so I can watch one player while we lose.
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Sylvan Lake, Alb |
Posts: | 3,694 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VACowboy
No frickin' way. Give me four more wins. I HATE losing. Running the table will do more for this team than being a few slots higher in the draft.
|
Absolutely the right answer. Our guys need to finish strong to build for next year. We'll get some help in the draft, but I'd rather see our existing players up their value.
The Truth will STILL not be the first casualty of war
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2005 |
Location: | Ohio |
Posts: | 1,415 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
I love that we're winning. It'll work out better this way for the draft as well, because we'll likely be picking in a spot that we can get a LT/RT at the right value. Which, as much as we want a flashy big name CB, is our TRUE need
Everybody wanting to lose to get a top flight player is backwards, IMO. Why would you want to get an elite player? To help your team win games. So why would you want to lose games to get that player? How does that make any sense? Winning is winning, I don't care about the playoffs. I watch my football team to see them win games, not so I can watch one player while we lose.
|
I'm with you on the OL, but not certain on the CB. I'd rather have a great defensive lineman or LB who can rush the pass than a great corner. We've had the lead late the last two games, only to have our defense allow the opponent to drive the length of the field & either win or tie the game. That's inexcusable, even if it was Drew Brees & Peyton Manning. With the receivers Manning had, there's no way we should have let that happen.
We need OLs bad! JJ hasn't taken an OL in the first two rounds in the last 6 drafts! Dude has no clue what wins games...the trenches, dummy. Get some big uglies in here who are studs on both sides of the ball & we will start winning SBs again.
[FONT=Palatino Linotype]Big props to The Man-Juke[/FONT]
|
|
|
12-07-2010
|
#12
|
|
Spider 2 Y-Banana
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Oct 2008 |
Location: | NOVA |
Posts: | 23,817 |
|
Still in the running for Peterson or Amukamara.
|
|
|
12-08-2010
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Atlanta |
Posts: | 1,952 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texan_Eph89
I hate losing too, but this team needs some Patrick Peterson.
|
This team needs a safety and an offensive tackle more than a CB. Tackles are a value more around picks 10-20 and safeties are usually 2nd round picks.
D-
|
|
|
12-09-2010
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2010 |
Posts: | 6,399 |
|
I like where we are. I prefer to go with the best pass rusher or offensive lineman available. Maybe take the best CB available in the 3rd round. Sure they may not be as good as Peterson or Prince but I think if we add a stud pass rusher like Quinn or Bowers, it will really help out our secondary
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.
|