Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2010   #1
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,253
NFL The Draft Order After Week 13

1-11
1. Panthers

2-10
2. Lions
3. Bengals
4. Bills

3-9
5. Cardinals
6. Broncos

4-8
7. 49ers
8. Cowboys

5-7
9. Titans
10. Redskins
11. Texans
12. Vikings
13. Browns

6-6
14. Rams
15. Chargers
16. Raiders
17. Seahawks
18. Colts
19. Dolphins

7-5
20. Jaguars
21. Buccaneers

8-4
22. Chiefs
23. Giants
24. Ravens
25. Eagles
26. Packers

9-3
27. Saints
28. Bears
29. Jets
30. Steelers

10-2
31. Patriots
32. Falcons
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2010   #2
jgboys1
Senior Member
 
jgboys1's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Nov 2005
Location:
Franklin Square
Posts:
3,450
Default

If we keep on winning we might not pick until the teens.
jgboys1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #3
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default Statistically Speaking .....

While unlikely, it is possible for us to draft anywhere from #1 overall, up to the last 8 win team (currently #26), unless the stars were to align, we make the playoffs and win the sb in which we would draft in slot #32. I'm not being a ********, just showing how huge a difference 4 weeks can make.
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #4
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
1-11
1. Panthers

2-10
2. Lions
3. Bengals
4. Bills

3-9
5. Cardinals
6. Broncos

4-8
7. 49ers
8. Cowboys

5-7
9. Titans
10. Redskins
11. Texans
12. Vikings
13. Browns

6-6
14. Rams
15. Chargers
16. Raiders
17. Seahawks
18. Colts
19. Dolphins

7-5
20. Jaguars
21. Buccaneers

8-4
22. Chiefs
23. Giants
24. Ravens
25. Eagles
26. Packers

9-3
27. Saints
28. Bears
29. Jets
30. Steelers

10-2
31. Patriots
32. Falcons

Thanks for the update on our current position. Realistically, if we continue to play well, I could see us catching the teams that are 6 and 6 now pretty easily, giving us a draft position in the mid teens. I personally think that since the playoffs are all but statistically out of reach, I think the team would be better served getting a draft pick in the top 8 teams rather than winning 4 more meaningless games and drafting as low as the early 20's.
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #5
Illini88228
Senior Member
 
Illini88228's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2010
Posts:
1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
Thanks for the update on our current position. Realistically, if we continue to play well, I could see us catching the teams that are 6 and 6 now pretty easily, giving us a draft position in the mid teens. I personally think that since the playoffs are all but statistically out of reach, I think the team would be better served getting a draft pick in the top 8 teams rather than winning 4 more meaningless games and drafting as low as the early 20's.
No one wants a top five pick. Every year the team's at the top of the draft try to trade down. It's too much money. Premo picks start at about the 8-9th spot down through the mid to late teens.
Illini88228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #6
MarionBarberThe4th
Banned
 
MarionBarberThe4th's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
11,667
Default

Well, look at it his way. We are trading down a few spots and in the process picking up a coach the players believe in.

Wouldnt you trade the #8th pick overall for the #15th and a top coach?
MarionBarberThe4th is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #7
VACowboy
Senior Member
 
VACowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
Thanks for the update on our current position. Realistically, if we continue to play well, I could see us catching the teams that are 6 and 6 now pretty easily, giving us a draft position in the mid teens. I personally think that since the playoffs are all but statistically out of reach, I think the team would be better served getting a draft pick in the top 8 teams rather than winning 4 more meaningless games and drafting as low as the early 20's.
No frickin' way. Give me four more wins. I HATE losing. Running the table will do more for this team than being a few slots higher in the draft.
VACowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #8
Texan_Eph89
Senior Member
 
Texan_Eph89's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
Fayetteville, AR
Posts:
941
Send a message via AIM to Texan_Eph89 Send a message via Yahoo to Texan_Eph89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VACowboy View Post
No frickin' way. Give me four more wins. I HATE losing. Running the table will do more for this team than being a few slots higher in the draft.
I hate losing too, but this team needs some Patrick Peterson.
Texan_Eph89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #9
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

I love that we're winning. It'll work out better this way for the draft as well, because we'll likely be picking in a spot that we can get a LT/RT at the right value. Which, as much as we want a flashy big name CB, is our TRUE need

Everybody wanting to lose to get a top flight player is backwards, IMO. Why would you want to get an elite player? To help your team win games. So why would you want to lose games to get that player? How does that make any sense? Winning is winning, I don't care about the playoffs. I watch my football team to see them win games, not so I can watch one player while we lose.
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #10
Phrozen Phil
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Sylvan Lake, Alb
Posts:
3,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VACowboy View Post
No frickin' way. Give me four more wins. I HATE losing. Running the table will do more for this team than being a few slots higher in the draft.
Absolutely the right answer. Our guys need to finish strong to build for next year. We'll get some help in the draft, but I'd rather see our existing players up their value.
The Truth will STILL not be the first casualty of war

Phrozen Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #11
Cogan
Senior Member
 
Cogan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Location:
Ohio
Posts:
1,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede View Post
I love that we're winning. It'll work out better this way for the draft as well, because we'll likely be picking in a spot that we can get a LT/RT at the right value. Which, as much as we want a flashy big name CB, is our TRUE need

Everybody wanting to lose to get a top flight player is backwards, IMO. Why would you want to get an elite player? To help your team win games. So why would you want to lose games to get that player? How does that make any sense? Winning is winning, I don't care about the playoffs. I watch my football team to see them win games, not so I can watch one player while we lose.
I'm with you on the OL, but not certain on the CB. I'd rather have a great defensive lineman or LB who can rush the pass than a great corner. We've had the lead late the last two games, only to have our defense allow the opponent to drive the length of the field & either win or tie the game. That's inexcusable, even if it was Drew Brees & Peyton Manning. With the receivers Manning had, there's no way we should have let that happen.

We need OLs bad! JJ hasn't taken an OL in the first two rounds in the last 6 drafts! Dude has no clue what wins games...the trenches, dummy. Get some big uglies in here who are studs on both sides of the ball & we will start winning SBs again.
[FONT=Palatino Linotype]Big props to The Man-Juke[/FONT]
Cogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010   #12
casmith07
Spider 2 Y-Banana
 
casmith07's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
NOVA
Posts:
23,817
Default

Still in the running for Peterson or Amukamara.
mas cerveza por favor
casmith07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2010   #13
dwmyers
Senior Member
 
dwmyers's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Atlanta
Posts:
1,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texan_Eph89 View Post
I hate losing too, but this team needs some Patrick Peterson.
This team needs a safety and an offensive tackle more than a CB. Tackles are a value more around picks 10-20 and safeties are usually 2nd round picks.

D-
dwmyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010   #14
TheCoolFan
Senior Member
 
TheCoolFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2010
Posts:
6,399
Default

I like where we are. I prefer to go with the best pass rusher or offensive lineman available. Maybe take the best CB available in the 3rd round. Sure they may not be as good as Peterson or Prince but I think if we add a stud pass rusher like Quinn or Bowers, it will really help out our secondary
TheCoolFan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com