|
03-01-2005
|
#31
|
|
Not Just For Breakfast Anymore
Joined: | Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 3,379 |
|
Thanks Adam!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RedLine
AdamJT13 - Do you work for the Cowboys? If not, you sure should, nice work!  |
I just wish he was a little more specific, that's all!  |
|
|
|
03-01-2005
|
#32
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Southeast, Unite |
Posts: | 17,490 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RedLine
AdamJT13 - Do you work for the Cowboys? If not, you sure should, nice work! |
No, he's the lead character on that new CBS show ... "Numbers" |
|
|
|
|
03-01-2005
|
#33
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2005, 2009, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Jupiter, Florida |
Posts: | 1,742 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AdamJT13
Depending on the cap adjustments carried over from 2004 for such things as Vinny Testaverde's incentives earned, Richie Anderson's unearned incentives and the 2005 allocation of the accelerated signing bonuses from the voided years in Pete Hunter's and Tyson Walter's contracts (none of which I've seen the official numbers for yet), I have us with $16,264,362 of cap room right now, based on the NFL's preliminary salary cap estimate of $85,500,000.
That includes the full cap charge for any players who might need to restucture, such as Dexter Coakley ($4,718,666 cap number, but only $1,833,332 if we cut him before Wednesday).
[View Full Quote] We have 63 players either under contract or tendered for 2005, and players 40-51 and 52-55 all have base salaries of $305,000. Because of the Rule of 51, that means any player we sign will bump $305,000 off our salary cap when his cap number is added to it. And any player we cut will add a $305,000 player to the cap. So, if we sign a free agent with a cap number of $1 million, our cap space will drop by only $695,000 (instead of $1 million) because he will bump a $305,000 player out of the top 51. And if we cut Coakley, for example, our cap space will go up by only $2,535,334 (instead of $2,885,334) because a $305,000 player will move into the top 51. |
Do your calulations include Bledsoe?
Don
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2005
|
#34
|
|
Salary Cap Analyst
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 14,759 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dstew60105
Do your calulations include Bledsoe?
|
Yes, they include everything we've done so far. |
|
|
|
|
03-01-2005
|
#35
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2005, 2009, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Jupiter, Florida |
Posts: | 1,742 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AdamJT13
Yes, they include everything we've done so far.
|
Thanks Adam, great work as usual.
Don
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2005
|
#36
|
|
5 outta 8 ain't bad
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,878 |
|
So since Coakley has been cut, by Adams calculations, we are now at $18,799,696.00 under.
Also, just wanted to bump this from page 2 so others could see what Adam does for this site.
Thanks Adam... 
That's why they play the game
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 PM.
|
