
|
12-26-2010
|
#1
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Peter King says Luck staying in school
SI's Peter King reported on Sunday Football Night in America on NBC Sunday that Stanford QB Andrew Luck's "current plan" is to stay in school rather than leave for the 2011 NFL draft.
King cites Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh, who does not believe Luck will go pro because of his commitment to academics. Should Luck enter the draft, he'd be the consensus favorite to be selected first overall by the Panthers. Ultimately, the third-year sophomore's decision may depend on his performance in the Cardinal's December 3 Orange Bowl matchup with Virginia Tech. The Hokies have one of the most talented secondaries in college football. Dec. 26 - 8:32 pm et
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#2
|
|
Preacher From The Black Lagoon
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | State of Grace |
Posts: | 27,478 |
|
This would be a stupid mistake.
"Those who would deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves..."-Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2008 |
Posts: | 4,000 |
|
epically stupid mistake
Still think Harbaugh leaves and Luck leaves as well
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#4
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Staying in school if you are a QB is rarely a mistake.
I'm still not convinced he will, but if he does good for him. Maybe Harbaugh is telling him he's staying at Stanford too, and they probably feel like they are gonna be a legit national title contender next yr.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2008 |
Posts: | 4,000 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967
Staying in school if you are a QB is rarely a mistake.
I'm still not convinced he will, but if he does good for him. Maybe Harbaugh is telling him he's staying at Stanford too, and they probably feel like they are gonna be a legit national title contender next yr.
|
It's a mistake if they institute a rookie cap that effects the 2012 draft. We're talking about losing tens of millions of dollars even if he holds onto the #1 pick.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#6
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manwiththeplan
It's a mistake if they institute a rookie cap that effects the 2012 draft. We're talking about losing tens of millions of dollars even if he holds onto the #1 pick.
|
It might hurt him financially in the beginning, then again if he believes in himself and he's as good as most think, he will make the money eventually. There's also off field endorsements which will pay him huge dollars, and he'd probably get that very early on.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2008 |
Posts: | 4,000 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967
It might hurt him financially in the beginning, then again if he believes in himself and he's as good as most think, he will make the money eventually. There's also off field endorsements which will pay him huge dollars, and he'd probably get that very early on.
|
All the more reason to go pro a year ealier. If Luck stays another year, he may be a better rookie and may get "it" sooner, but if he's gonna be a player, 1 year won't make a difference. So he gets 1 more year as a pro, 1 more year for endorsements and he avoids the rookie cap.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2010, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 1,415 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967
Staying in school if you are a QB is rarely a mistake.
I'm still not convinced he will, but if he does good for him. Maybe Harbaugh is telling him he's staying at Stanford too, and they probably feel like they are gonna be a legit national title contender next yr.
|
There is absolutely no upside to staying in school as far as the draft is concerned.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#9
|
|
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
Joined: | Feb 2005 |
Location: | Falconer, NY |
Posts: | 13,894 |
|
I'll believe it when I see it.
He can always get his degree but he may not always be able to cash in.
Quote:
|
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
|
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#10
|
|
The Dog that Saved Charleston
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Herriman, UT |
Posts: | 7,158 |
|
Ask Jake Locker about that plan.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#11
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Mar 2010 |
Location: | Vancouver, Briti |
Posts: | 2,023 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manwiththeplan
epically stupid mistake
Still think Harbaugh leaves and Luck leaves as well
|
Who was preaching this earlier again?
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#12
|
|
Draft
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Oct 2009 |
Location: | New York |
Posts: | 10,888 |
|
Horid plan, currently he is viewed as a flawless prospect, an Aikman. Only negatives can come from going back.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2008 |
Posts: | 4,000 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avery
Ask Jake Locker about that plan.
|
Jake Locker allegedly didn't recieve a first round grade when he applied for an evaluation last years, so I don't think he would've been the top pick like Luck. IMO, once scouts looked at game tape, he would've been exposed and likely been a 2nd round pick.
Atleast now, he can play in the senior bowl, which typically helps. BTW does anyone know who is coaching the senior bowl?
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#14
|
|
Draft
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Oct 2009 |
Location: | New York |
Posts: | 10,888 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manwiththeplan
Jake Locker allegedly didn't recieve a first round grade when he applied for an evaluation last years, so I don't think he would've been the top pick like Luck. IMO, once scouts looked at game tape, he would've been exposed and likely been a 2nd round pick.
Atleast now, he can play in the senior bowl, which typically helps. BTW does anyone know who is coaching the senior bowl?
|
Locker would've been a first round pick, Vikings at #30 the latest, and wasn't there reports that the Rams would've taken Locker over Bradford around mid march when people were still debating Bradford or Clausen, and people were saying if only Locker declared we wouldn't be arguing this right now we'd just be placing in Bradford at #4 to washington, and Clausen at the next needed QB slot.
Infact if Locker did declare, its entirely likely that Bradford would be facing us for over the next decade over in washington, so we all owe him a huge thank you for his dumb mistake.
|
|
|
12-26-2010
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2008 |
Posts: | 4,000 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romo 2 Austin
Locker would've been a first round pick, Vikings at #30 the latest
|
Based on what? If the Vikes weren't desperate enough to draft Clausen, what makes you believe that they would've taken Locker? Minnesota was in a win no mode and selected 2 playeres they atleast believed would help them win now.
Quote:
|
and wasn't there reports that the Rams would've taken Locker over Bradford around mid march when people were still debating Bradford or Clausen, and people were saying if only Locker declared we wouldn't be arguing this right now we'd just be placing in Bradford at #4 to washington, and Clausen at the next needed QB slot.
|
The underclassmen deadline is in January, so once he returned to school, it would be stupid for Rams scouts to waste anytime looking at his game film and breaking him down. Therefor any "reports" were just pure speculation.
Quote:
|
Infact if Locker did declare, its entirely likely that Bradford would be facing us for over the next decade over in washington, so we all owe him a huge thank you for his dumb mistake.
|
The problem with this theory is he would have to wow scouts with his workouts to go this high (I think we can all atleast agree that once his actual game film was broken down, his stock would fall a bit). And if he was capable of doing that last year, he has an even greater opportunity to this year because he can play in the senior bowl.
All in all, Locker never would've went ahead of Bradford, despite all the Todd McShay love he recieved and I believe despite not taking full advantage of going back to school, he made the right decision coming back.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.
|