
|
03-01-2011
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2010 |
Posts: | 1,744 |
|
Cowboys "Covet" Patrick Peterson
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&id=6481&line=2011 01&spln=1
Quote:
Patrick Peterson - DB - Player
Citing sources, SI's Tony Pauline reports that the Cowboys have LSU CB Patrick Peterson ranked as the top player in the 2011 NFL draft.
Their high opinion was only reinforced by Peterson's 4.32 and 4.37 forty times Tuesday at the Combine. Per Pauline, Dallas "covets" the 2010 Thorpe Award winner. The Cowboys draft ninth overall, so they may strongly consider a move up for Peterson. Terence Newman is a candidate for offseason release.
Related: Cowboys
|
Go get him Jerry!
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#2
|
|
Spider 2 Y-Banana
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Oct 2008 |
Location: | NOVA |
Posts: | 23,817 |
|
I'm already drooling at the thought of Newman and Peterson in the same backfield.
Eli Manning already loves throwing to Newman...can you imagine when he can't pick which side to throw it? Pick City.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2009 |
Location: | Chesapeake |
Posts: | 414 |
|
Jerry on a mission
Future Dallas Quarterback
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#4
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 6,986 |
|
Not sure drafting Peterson would preclude keeping Newman. Anyways, I think it's all a pipe dream as Peterson is likely Top 3 and the price to steep to move up.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#5
|
|
Bi-polar? I'm Bi-winning, I've got Tigers blood and Adonis DNA!!
Joined: | Feb 2010 |
Location: | Tyler,Tx |
Posts: | 2,240 |
|
We all know what it means when Jerry gets that look in his eye
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameover
Romo is 100% the main problem.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameover
I see a team that could finish 4-12.
|
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#6
|
|
1st Round Pick
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 25,195 |
|
It aint happening.
Maybe if you would've played some younger guys against Philly's backups and we caught an L but winning that game was more important that getting this player.
We just need to get Marcell Dareus somehow and be stoked we got a player of his caliber @ 9.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#7
|
|
Dark Days
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 56,836 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17
It aint happening.
Maybe if you would've played some younger guys against Philly's backups and we caught an L but winning that game was more important that getting this player.
We just need to get Marcell Dareus somehow and be stoked we got a player of his caliber @ 9.
|
You confine your Dareus man love to Dareus threads. This is The patrick man love thread. 
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,098 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick
Not sure drafting Peterson would preclude keeping Newman. Anyways, I think it's all a pipe dream as Peterson is likely Top 3 and the price to steep to move up.
|
I still don't see Peterson going top 4
Best case is 5th..Gives Jerry a chance to move up to 5th and if AZ doesn't take him, which is highly possible, we could try and deal w Cle too..
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,098 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17
It aint happening.
Maybe if you would've played some younger guys against Philly's backups and we caught an L but winning that game was more important that getting this player.
We just need to get Marcell Dareus somehow and be stoked we got a player of his caliber @ 9.
|
Cam Jordan > Dareus as a 5-tech
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#10
|
|
Bi-polar? I'm Bi-winning, I've got Tigers blood and Adonis DNA!!
Joined: | Feb 2010 |
Location: | Tyler,Tx |
Posts: | 2,240 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
Cam Jordan > Dareus as a 5-tech
|
Yep agree, I don't like Dareus that much
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameover
Romo is 100% the main problem.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameover
I see a team that could finish 4-12.
|
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#11
|
|
1st Round Pick
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 25,195 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
I still don't see Peterson going top 4
Best case is 5th..Gives Jerry a chance to move up to 5th and if AZ doesn't take him, which is highly possible, we could try and deal w Cle too..
|
If he is the best player in this draft or even top 3 player in this draft I don't see how he makes it out of the top 4 or 5.
I hope like heck he drops to 6th but I just don't see how we'll get him.
And will he be a corner or safety? He better be an Ed Reed type Safety if we give up a high 1 & 3.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#12
|
|
The Dog that Saved Charleston
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Herriman, UT |
Posts: | 7,159 |
|
32 teams covet PP - we're no different.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#13
|
|
Unfriendly and Aloof!
Joined: | May 2006 |
Location: | Betelgeuse |
Posts: | 30,975 |
|
I wouldn't trade up for Peterson.
Formerly the notorious nyc!
I've got more red flags than Soviet Russia!
There is a good chance that you don't like me, but there is a better chance that I don't care.
If I'm not insulting you, I'm probably not aware that you exist.
Jerry Jones in the draft room is suicide on the football field. The line of scrimmage is EVERYTHING. Something Jerry doesn't understand.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#14
|
|
1st Round Pick
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 25,195 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
Cam Jordan > Dareus as a 5-tech
|
I can buy that. I think they are all good players on the D line.
I just have always had a lot of respect for Marcel Dareus.
The closer we get to the draft the more im kinda leaning towards wanting the sure thing.
He is a MAN and he is going to be a stud player in this league for sure.
He may not be extremely impactful... But he'll be great at what ever it is a team asks him to do.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#15
|
|
1st Round Pick
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 25,195 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyc
I wouldn't trade up for Peterson.
|
I would give up a 1 & 4 if that was at all possible.
1 & 3 seems like a ton though.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 PM.
|