Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-17-2011   #1
Cowboy from New York
Senior Member
 
Cowboy from New York's Avatar
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Syracuse New Yor
Posts:
1,613
Default GBN draft report(rumor) on Tyron Smith slipping in draft.

Sorry if repost

http://www.gbnreport.com/draftbuzz.html

… One gets the impression that USC OT Tyron Smith could also be slipping. There had been speculation that Smith may have vaulted himself into the top 10 with an outstanding pro day where he weighed in at 307 pounds, but still ran close to 4.9 seconds over 40 yards. Indeed, there has been speculation that Smith could be headed to Dallas with the 9th pick when Cowboys’ head coach Jason Garrett made his only pro day visit at Smith’s workout. Like just about every top prospect in this year’s draft, though, Smith has a few warts. He played at barely 280 pounds in college and there are concerns whether he’ll be able to maintain his current weight over a long, grueling NFL schedule; Smith also played only RT in college but is being considered as a top 10 prospect as a LT; plus Smith is still very young - he won’t turn 21 until late in his rookie season and there have been questions about his maturity and off-field work ethic. Whether those concerns are enough to drop Smith remains to be seen, but he has four late on-site visits scheduled next week and three of them are with teams picking in the second half of the opening round. Smith, who has already visited with Cleveland, Dallas, Minnesota and Indianapolis, will be in Washington in next to visit with the Redskins who have the 10th pick, but will also be at New England, the Giants and Tampa Bay, which pick 17th, 19th and 20th respectively. Again, on-sites are an imperfect measure of where a player stands, but its also true that teams don’t like to waste their time in the days before the draft so Smith’s status may be something to watch over the next couple of weeks….
Cowboy from New York is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-17-2011   #2
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

I think he will be gone in the top 13 picks.

And if we stay at 9, we'll probably draft him.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #3
sonnyboy
Benched
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Voorhees NJ
Posts:
7,355
Default

I'm liking Smith at #9 less and less.

Top 10 picks should be can't miss prospects with a track record.

Top 10 picks should play the higher impact positions: QB,RB,WR,OLB,CB,NT.

As a rule of thumb, I never liked drafting OL early because so much of their success is about character and work ethic. You get more late round gems and 1st rd busts than any other position for that reason alone.

Now I can't say I know this kid or what his work ethic is or will be. Is he the next Alex Barron? IDK.

What I think I do know is that the risk doesn't out weigh the reward.
sonnyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #4
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,175
Default

Lets see: worked like a fiend since the last game to put on 25 pounds. Increased his bench from combine to Pro Day.

Yet his off field work ethic is questioned.

This usually starts happening about two weeks for the draft. Stupid crap gets repeated until too many think its true. All the top choices get this; so in effect that just sets in stone the fact that Smith is now a top pick.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #5
sonnyboy
Benched
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Voorhees NJ
Posts:
7,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
Lets see: worked like a fiend since the last game to put on 25 pounds. Increased his bench from combine to Pro Day.

Yet his off field work ethic is questioned.

This usually starts happening about two weeks for the draft. Stupid crap gets repeated until too many think its true. All the top choices get this; so in effect that just sets in stone the fact that Smith is now a top pick.

That's a good point and I'll be the first to admit I know jack about this kid. He could be the hardest working kid on the planet.


I just hope the Cowboy's did their homework and know what to expect. And if the kid has any work ethic concerns above what you'd normally have with any player........take a pass.

There is just no room for that for an OL at the pro level.
sonnyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #6
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,175
Default

There has not been anyone mentioning work ethic until NOW. which is the time when garbage is spewed- usually by teams wanting a prospect to fall. But I would not put it above say an agent for Solder or Castonso doing it either.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #7
Cowboy from New York
Senior Member
 
Cowboy from New York's Avatar
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Syracuse New Yor
Posts:
1,613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
Lets see: worked like a fiend since the last game to put on 25 pounds. Increased his bench from combine to Pro Day.

Yet his off field work ethic is questioned.

This usually starts happening about two weeks for the draft. Stupid crap gets repeated until too many think its true. All the top choices get this; so in effect that just sets in stone the fact that Smith is now a top pick.
I lean toward Smith as our pick, like most I would love to be greedy and see a trade down and still get him. I am by no means badmouthing him, just putting interesting article for others to see. But I also wouldnt put much stock in a work ethic of someone working out like a fiend to raise his draft status and therefore his contract $$$.
Cowboy from New York is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #8
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,175
Default

there is also no indication from anyone else that this was a problem until NOW. You don't think it would have been mentioned before? People have been talking him up for months. But nothing like this had come out. The question is why. I really doubt that it was covered up; or that no one else noticed.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #9
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy from New York View Post
I lean toward Smith as our pick, like most I would love to be greedy and see a trade down and still get him. I am by no means badmouthing him, just putting interesting article for others to see. But I also wouldnt put much stock in a work ethic of someone working out like a fiend to raise his draft status and therefore his contract $$$.
T Smith's effort on the field or his work ethic hasn't really been questioned until (as already mentioned in a post earlier) about 2 weeks before the Draft.

I mean, the guy was voted by the top OL in the Pac 10 when he was 19 years old.

I think this is typical garbage spewed on top picks just before the Draft . . . . it happens to a lot of these guys leading up to the big day.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #10
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woods View Post
T Smith's effort on the field or his work ethic hasn't really been questioned until (as already mentioned in a post earlier) about 2 weeks before the Draft.

I mean, the guy was voted by the top OL in the Pac 10 when he was 19 years old.

I think this is typical garbage spewed on top picks just before the Draft . . . . it happens to a lot of these guys leading up to the big day.

That is the point I am making. This is the time when out and out lies are told about prospects.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #11
johnnyd
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,656
Default

violent agreement guys
johnnyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #12
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,799
Default

My bet is none of this will change the Cowboys opinion on Smith in any way.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #13
bsheeern
Senior Member
 
bsheeern's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
1,570
Default

Somebody got this kid to work enough to come up big at his pro day. That shows me that if we have the environment to push him and make him work, then I wouldn't let the rumors stop me from drafting him. There would have to be signs of a real issue.

On the other hand if the environment is more like what it was with wade, then I'd pass purely because of his age and rawness.

Biggest thing about him is the word Develop and not Transition. He won't just "transition" into the NFL like you hear so many coaches say about more polished prospects. He will have to "Develop" at the NFL level and a lot more goes into a pick like that than 1 who just needs to transition.
The next 2-3 years are the most critical for this kid more than Most other options we are considering.

Each staff can only handle so many "develop" picks or players at a time. It's like having special needs students in a class with regular students and even advanced students. You can only spread your attention but so far.
bsheeern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #14
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonnyboy View Post
I'm liking Smith at #9 less and less.

Top 10 picks should be can't miss prospects with a track record.

Top 10 picks should play the higher impact positions: QB,RB,WR,OLB,CB,NT.

As a rule of thumb, I never liked drafting OL early because so much of their success is about character and work ethic. You get more late round gems and 1st rd busts than any other position for that reason alone.

Now I can't say I know this kid or what his work ethic is or will be. Is he the next Alex Barron? IDK.

What I think I do know is that the risk doesn't out weigh the reward.
OK, who is cant miss at 9?
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011   #15
Fletch
To The Moon
 
Fletch's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Location:
Blairsville, PA
Posts:
8,574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big dog cowboy View Post
My bet is none of this will change the Cowboys opinion on Smith in any way.
I think Garrett has really done his homework. Whether it's Tyron or whoever, I cannot wait to see the Cowboys draft.


DESTINATION... END ZONE!!!
Fletch is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com