Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-20-2011   #1
CCBoy
Senior Member
 
CCBoy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Posts:
13,340
Star BTB: 2011 NFL Draft Rumors: Cowboys To Address O-Line Via Free Agency?

2011 NFL Draft Rumors: Cowboys To Address O-Line Via Free Agency?
by One.Cool.Customer



http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2011/...ia-free-agency




A little over a week left before the draft and the rumors, speculations and other draft news are almost starting to come faster than we can keep track of.

There's a report out by Tony Pauline on draftinsider.net that the Cowboys are seriously considering signing a veteran free agent tackle and taking a defensive lineman with their first choice.

After the break, we look at what Tony Pauline wrote in detail, we look at how offensive rookie linemen have performed the last two years and who the available free agents could be.



Here's what Tony Puline wrote yesterday:

The Dallas Cowboys may deviate from taking Tyron Smith with the 9th pick if they can’t trade down. We hear the recent knee issues which have surfaced on the junior tackle from USC have not scared the team but they are also considering picking up a veteran free agent tackle, once free agency begins, then taking a defensive lineman with their first choice.

The thinking is a veteran free agent tackle could break into the starting line-up sooner than Smith, especially since the lockout will reduce every rookies time spent in mini-camp, OTA’s, etc. Sources have said the defensive lineman they are targeting is Cameron Jordan - in our minds the most underrated player in this draft. Ultimately they’d still prefer to trade down, collect some extra picks and then select an offensive tackle later in the first frame. The other team very high on Cameron Jordan at this point are the Washington Redskins...
There's no right way to do the wrong thing.

To compete for the playoffs, Dallas has to improve here: Only four sacks against Eli Manning over the past six games!
CCBoy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2011   #2
DanteEXT
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Indiana
Posts:
1,363
Default

So, essentially the 'boys may not use a first round pick on an OL? Considering the recent draft history this isn't much more than an well educated guess IMO. I mean, it could be a rumor circulating. But it also sounds like recent draft strategy as well.
DanteEXT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #3
HoosierCowboy
Put Pearson in the HOF
 
HoosierCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2007
Posts:
2,042
Default

if we can land a FA or two (especially DB and OL), i hope we trade down a bit (Rams at 14?) and still get a quality lineman (best OL or DL available)
HoosierCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #4
EGG
Senior Member
 
EGG's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,620
Default

This is the best scenario IMO,,, the value seems to be @ DL in this draft and the Cowboys need help there as well as a good CB if Amakumura is still available.

Also, I would hope they are planning on signing FA offensive linemen regardless of who the first pick is...
EGG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #5
Richmond Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
937
Default

I don't mind them trading down as long it's not for the sake of stockpiling late round picks ala 2009...
Richmond Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #6
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Dallas would be stupid to not at least consider this even though they truly need to draft an R1 OL.

The desired move imho is a trade down. When Jerry can't get a guy that will score TDs and sell jerseys he likes to move down.

And with this OL crop moving down makes tons of sense.

I like Tyron Smith's potential a heck of a lot but I'd rather have Carimi/Sherrod and Wisnewski as a tandem with the value of that 9th slot.
But I still don't know what any team saw Thursday night that would have made them comfortable with waiting a round or two for the offensive lineman they wanted. ---Todd McShay
We just converted half our LB to DL. We have a 30m starting DL, it better be pretty friggin good.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #7
mmillman
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2006
Posts:
2,052
Default

Dallas shouldn't take the short term view. Take the BPA. If they think they can get a better player at DE than OT then take him. Problem will be who will fill the RT spot?
mmillman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #8
mmillman
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2006
Posts:
2,052
Default

Smith should be the choice as he is athletic enough to play LT long term and in case of injury.
mmillman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #9
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,341
Default

I getting a FA OL would be a smart thing to do I would still hope that Dallas will address the OL within the 1st 3 rds of the draft.
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #10
CCBoy
Senior Member
 
CCBoy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Posts:
13,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell View Post
Dallas would be stupid to not at least consider this even though they truly need to draft an R1 OL.

The desired move imho is a trade down. When Jerry can't get a guy that will score TDs and sell jerseys he likes to move down.

And with this OL crop moving down makes tons of sense.

I like Tyron Smith's potential a heck of a lot but I'd rather have Carimi/Sherrod and Wisnewski as a tandem with the value of that 9th slot.
This draft appears to be very strong in talent for offensive line, defensive line, and wide receivers in the top three rounds. Day One and Two should probably be conducted just there.
There's no right way to do the wrong thing.

To compete for the playoffs, Dallas has to improve here: Only four sacks against Eli Manning over the past six games!
CCBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #11
zrinkill
Diamond surrounded by trash
 
zrinkill's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
32,042
Default

Whatever it takes ...
victory is ours
zrinkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #12
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

I have no preference with how the Cowboys fill its need at OL (draft or FA), just that they do it with adequate players.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #13
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmillman View Post
Smith should be the choice as he is athletic enough to play LT long term and in case of injury.
Interesting takes you make there back to back. On one hand take the BPA on the other take the guy based upon potential. To me that says take the BPA 3 years from now but not today.

I'd refer you to Bob Sturm's thoughts on this as I agree with him. NFL teams with legit playoff hopes can not take BPA in round 1. They need to take the BPA that can fill a starting role. While you don't want lesser players you do want guys who fill the proper role on your team. A lesser player who is a better fit will perform better in many cases. The BPA at 9 is probably Julio Jones or Mark Ingram. Jones athletically, Ingram based upon football accomplishment an raw performance. I don't think we should really consider either at 9.

Now where I tend to end up in agreement with you is if you can not get a trade down for good value taking Smith at 9 may mean Best Available fit for Dallas.
But I still don't know what any team saw Thursday night that would have made them comfortable with waiting a round or two for the offensive lineman they wanted. ---Todd McShay
We just converted half our LB to DL. We have a 30m starting DL, it better be pretty friggin good.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #14
CCBoy
Senior Member
 
CCBoy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Posts:
13,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell View Post
Interesting takes you make there back to back. On one hand take the BPA on the other take the guy based upon potential. To me that says take the BPA 3 years from now but not today.

I'd refer you to Bob Sturm's thoughts on this as I agree with him. NFL teams with legit playoff hopes can not take BPA in round 1. They need to take the BPA that can fill a starting role. While you don't want lesser players you do want guys who fill the proper role on your team. A lesser player who is a better fit will perform better in many cases. The BPA at 9 is probably Julio Jones or Mark Ingram. Jones athletically, Ingram based upon football accomplishment an raw performance. I don't think we should really consider either at 9.

Now where I tend to end up in agreement with you is if you can not get a trade down for good value taking Smith at 9 may mean Best Available fit for Dallas.
Interesting as well...for although this team has a high level of quality players, it is nowhere one spot only short of contention. BPA is still the tone of outlook.
There's no right way to do the wrong thing.

To compete for the playoffs, Dallas has to improve here: Only four sacks against Eli Manning over the past six games!
CCBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011   #15
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell View Post
Interesting takes you make there back to back. On one hand take the BPA on the other take the guy based upon potential. To me that says take the BPA 3 years from now but not today.

I'd refer you to Bob Sturm's thoughts on this as I agree with him. NFL teams with legit playoff hopes can not take BPA in round 1. They need to take the BPA that can fill a starting role. While you don't want lesser players you do want guys who fill the proper role on your team. A lesser player who is a better fit will perform better in many cases. The BPA at 9 is probably Julio Jones or Mark Ingram. Jones athletically, Ingram based upon football accomplishment an raw performance. I don't think we should really consider either at 9.

Now where I tend to end up in agreement with you is if you can not get a trade down for good value taking Smith at 9 may mean Best Available fit for Dallas.
I share this opinion as well. I think that the Cowboys have a window of opportunity for a championship and I think that we are in it now as I believe that Romo is at a point in his career where he has enough knowledge, combined with sufficient skill level and health level to compete for a championship. I think that 5 years from now, that situation will be different but as of right now, I agree with this take. The one thing I don't agree with is the selection at 9. If we can't trade out, and we intend to sign somebody in FA, then I think it might be wise to take the best player on our board that can project to a starter day one. Now, that still might be Smith but it could also be another player.
ABQCOWBOY is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com