
|
04-28-2011
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,096 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
What if they could have gotten Kenrick Ellis, Rahim Moore, or Will Rackley at 49 after getting Aaron Williams at 40.
|
Id still much rather have Smith..
honestly, hes the only OT i wanted
I LOVE his upside..having the 9th pick, I wanted to make sure we took advantage of it..and I think we did
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#17
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tm1119
Correct? If so, how do you feel about not taking that deal?
|
So what if they did? Atlanta set the bar for a significant move much higher than that with their deal. There was no reason for us to "settle" or just trade for the sake of getting an extra pick.
They did the right thing. Either get exactly what you want or dont do the deal. We got a great player at a huge area of need, there's no loss in that situation.
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#18
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
FWST reported it. I wouldn't have minded a move down.
|
Yeah, they also reported we were definitely taking Constanzo over Smith
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#19
|
|
Run-loving Dino
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | 1-star thread |
Posts: | 32,048 |
|
It all depends on how Smith and the other guys turn out, doesn't it? If Solder or Castanzo or even Sherrod are close to as good as Smith, maybe we should've traded down.
But if Smith lives up to all the potential we seem to think he has, we probably did the right thing... And I usually like trading back.
I guess the other question would be if Prince turned out to be really, really good... But somehow I don't see that.
Ivy League
Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#20
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
What if they could have gotten Kenrick Ellis, Rahim Moore, or Will Rackley at 49 after getting Aaron Williams at 40.
|
I'd rather sign Michael Huff to play FS instead of drafting either Williams or Moore.
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 18,279 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Picksix
Stephen said earlier that they had four guys on their short list of who they wanted. So if you trade down seven spots, too big a risk that those guys are all gone by 16. Then you have people complaining that they got too cute and missed their guy. I'd love to have 49, but I'm fine with them staying put and taking Smith.
|
Only two of the four (at most)were gone by 16 and that is counting Smith. JJ Watt was probably the other. Castonzo and Solder were still there and so was Cameron Jordan. Amukamara was also still there.
****
"The restructures are built in. Everybody’s making a big to do about this. I don’t know why."- Stephen Jones
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,096 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
Only two of the four (at most)were gone by 16 and that is counting Smith. JJ Watt was probably the other. Castonzo and Solder were still there and so was Cameron Jordan.
|
The pick would have been Solder or Castonzo..im glad we didnt move down
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 18,279 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967
I'd rather sign Michael Huff to play FS instead of drafting either Williams or Moore.
|
Williams can play corner. I would have had Heyward or Wilkerson at 40 but they are gone. Red may want Dalton, I hope not.
****
"The restructures are built in. Everybody’s making a big to do about this. I don’t know why."- Stephen Jones
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 18,279 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
The pick would have been Solder or Castonzo..im glad we didnt move down
|
You have to look at who the other guy would have been. We'll see tomorrow. Castonzo had to be the trade down target.
****
"The restructures are built in. Everybody’s making a big to do about this. I don’t know why."- Stephen Jones
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2009 |
Posts: | 355 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tm1119
Correct? If so, how do you feel about not taking that deal?
|
If they were presented with that and didn't take it then i'm dissapointed, however let's see what happens tomorrow. I would have traded down unles Peterson was there. We took care of the line so i'm happy, but you pick him at nine then he has to start RT.
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,096 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
You have to look at who the other guy would have been. We'll see tomorrow. Castonzo had to be the trade down target.
|
yeah, like I said..Sodler or Castonzo..I agree that it was likely Castonzo
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2011 |
Location: | Plano, Texas |
Posts: | 760 |
|
Idk, 49 is definitely tempting especially how the first round turned out, lots of talent left. I think we could have traded up a couple spots in the first to get Smith, and only had to give up a third or something but that is getting risky so I'm glad we got a guy that we really needed.
|
|
|
04-28-2011
|
#28
|
|
De puts the D back in D
Joined: | May 2007 |
Posts: | 2,720 |
|
Would have taken it, Castonzo would have been a great RT still and we have options for the next round.
|
|
|
04-29-2011
|
#29
|
|
A Work in Progress
Joined: | Apr 2008 |
Location: | University Place |
Posts: | 2,896 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88
Only two of the four (at most)were gone by 16 and that is counting Smith. JJ Watt was probably the other. Castonzo and Solder were still there and so was Cameron Jordan. Amukamara was also still there.
|
Yeah, but it's not like they knew that's how things were going to shake out. Like dbair said, you get exactly what you want, or you don't make the deal.
There's always more to the story.
|
|
|
04-29-2011
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2004 |
Location: | Fort Worth, Tx |
Posts: | 827 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
yeah, like I said..Sodler or Castonzo..I agree that it was likely Castonzo
|
The Boys had Solder rated higher than Castonzo
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.
|