|
05-31-2004
|
#16
|
|
Member
|
Signing George means taking valuable snaps away from young RB's Jones, Lee, Bickerstaff, and Cason.
DALLAS already has the old man vet to help the young pups - Anderson.
Tuna will not sign George; it truly does fly in the face of everything they've done this off season.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2004
|
#17
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 22,015 |
|
Fly in the face of what?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boss man
Signing George means taking valuable snaps away from young RB's Jones, Lee, Bickerstaff, and Cason.
DALLAS already has the old man vet to help the young pups - Anderson.
Tuna will not sign George; it truly does fly in the face of everything they've done this off season.
|
Adding a 32 year old WR and a 29 year old coming off injury DE?
Parcells historically likes bigger backs and does not trust rookies much.
I guarantee you Parcells has discussed this move - potentially |
|
|
|
|
05-31-2004
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,599 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nors
Adding a 32 year old WR and a 29 year old coming off injury DE?
Parcells historically likes bigger backs and does not trust rookies much.
I guarantee you Parcells has discussed this move - potentially
|
We had a vet 230+ pound RB that averaged 3 yards a carry, that was younger and cheaper than George, his name was Hambrick.
He was a bigger, non-rookie back, right? |
|
|
|
|
05-31-2004
|
#19
|
|
THE BIG DOG
Years Donated 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Ahhhhh Kansas |
Posts: | 42,820 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boss man
Signing George means taking valuable snaps away from young RB's Jones, Lee, Bickerstaff, and Cason.
DALLAS already has the old man vet to help the young pups - Anderson.
Tuna will not sign George; it truly does fly in the face of everything they've done this off season.
|
A lot of truth being told there!
This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2004
|
#20
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 22,015 |
|
ok
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blindzebra
We had a vet 230+ pound RB that averaged 3 yards a carry, that was younger and cheaper than George, his name was Hambrick.
He was a bigger, non-rookie back, right?
|
Eddie Georhe is a 30 year old RB with 10,00O yARDS, tHam is well an unfrafTd FA RB. |
|
|
|
|
05-31-2004
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,599 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nors
Eddie Georhe is a 30 year old RB with 10,00O yARDS, tHam is well an unfrafTd FA RB.
|
George is a 30 year old RB with 10,000 yards that has averaged a little over 3 yards a carry for the last three years. He is washed up. |
|
|
|
|
05-31-2004
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,898 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sarge
I would too - George at this stage of his career is still better than Hambrick. BUT, it's surprisingly closer than you think.
George is a very tired football player.
|
Eddie George played with a better o-line and qb than troy hambrick, and averaged less per carry than Hambrick. How do you figure at this stage of his career, he is better than Hambrick? |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.
|
