Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2012   #1
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,778
Default Scouts Inc. - Tape trumps combine for these prospects

We've heard a lot of talk in recent days about the prospects who had disappointing performances at the 2012 NFL combine, but the fact of the matter is that some of those showings won't matter much in the eyes of scouts.

Some guys are simply better when they put the pads on than when they are testing in shorts and T-shirts, and in the end it's the game tape that counts most. With that in mind, here are five prospects whose stock won't be affected much by subpar combine performances.

Baylor WR Kendall Wright
Wright (5-foot-10¼, 196 pounds) entered combine week as a first-round prospect, and he remains there despite posting a disappointing time of 4.61 seconds in the 40-yard dash. Scouts are still comfortable with what Wright brings to the table, because on tape he shows good explosiveness off the line and the ability to quickly eat up a defender's cushion, the body control to drop his weight and stop on a dime, and enough speed to stretch the field.

In looking for a recent comparison for Wright, I keep coming back to Pittsburgh Steelers WR Antonio Brown, who is essentially the same size as Wright and ran a 4.57 coming out of Central Michigan in 2010. Brown has become a solid deep threat for the Steelers, and Wright could be the same for the team the drafts him. Those likely to be interested in the first round include the Chicago Bears (No. 19 overall), Cleveland Browns (No. 22), Houston Texans (No. 26), San Francisco 49ers (No. 30) and New England Patriots.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/blog/...uble-prospects

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-02-2012   #2
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,778
Default

The other players listed were - Michael Brockers, Courtney Upshaw, Vinny Curry and Janzen Jackson.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012   #3
jblaze2004
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2004
Posts:
7,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
The other players listed were - Michael Brockers, Courtney Upshaw, Vinny Curry and Janzen Jackson.
can you copy and paste what was said about brockers.
jblaze2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012   #4
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jblaze2004 View Post
can you copy and paste what was said about brockers.
I don't think that would be against the rules here, since there's still a lot more info to read.

LSU DT Michael Brockers
Brockers had a poor showing in pretty much every area: 5.36 in the 40; 26.5-inch vertical jump; 8-foot-1 broad jump; 4.81 short shuttle; 7.46 three-cone drill. However, Brockers has impressive natural core strength and power -- as opposed to weight-room strength -- and the tape of his regular-season performance against Alabama is one of the most dominant I saw from a 2012 prospect. The Crimson Tide simply had no answer for him inside.

In this draft, Brockers (6-5, 322) is the most stout defensive tackle at the point of attack. He displays the ability to use his hands to disengage from blocks and fall back into plays, while showing the versatility to play the 3-technique (DT) in a 4-3 scheme or the 5-technique (DE) in a 3-4. His tape is more consistent than the likes of Dontari Poe (Memphis), Jerel Worthy (Michigan State) and Devon Still (Penn State); based on that, Brockers clearly belongs in the first round. The Carolina Panthers could show interest at No. 9 overall, and if Brockers falls a bit, the Denver Broncos could get a steal at No. 25.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #5
casmith07
Spider 2 Y-Banana
 
casmith07's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
NOVA
Posts:
23,817
Default

The tape certainly is better than the combine for Courtney Upshaw. He's quite simply a beast on the field.

That entire defense was head and shoulders better than the competition in college football, though.
mas cerveza por favor
casmith07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #6
marchetta
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
2,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
In this draft, Brockers (6-5, 322) is the most stout defensive tackle at the point of attack. He displays the ability to use his hands to disengage from blocks and fall back into plays, while showing the versatility to play the 3-technique (DT) in a 4-3 scheme or the 5-technique (DE) in a 3-4.
As much as I dislike Brockers, I will give him this. He is truly the most stout guy on DL in this draft. He's virtually immovable without a double-team. He won't offer you much as a pass-rusher. But, you won't blow him off the LOS. He's virtually identical to Spears. If our 3-4 is truly designed for DEs to hold their position at the LOS, in order for the LBs to make plays, then Brockers' the man for us . We'd be getting a Spears clone, which would prevent most teams from being able to run on us. However, we'd put ALL the pressure on our LBs to make plays and provide the pass-rush. If Dallas feels they can really position Spencer to be a true pass-rush/playmaking threat, or upgrade the LB position with pass rushers and play-makers (Nick Perry, Bruce Irvin, ...) later in the draft, then I'd be for getting Brockers.
marchetta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #7
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marchetta View Post
As much as I dislike Brockers, I will give him this. He is truly the most stout guy on DL in this draft. He's virtually immovable without a double-team. He won't offer you much as a pass-rusher. But, you won't blow him off the LOS. He's virtually identical to Spears. If our 3-4 is truly designed for DEs to hold their position at the LOS, in order for the LBs to make plays, then Brockers' the man for us . We'd be getting a Spears clone, which would prevent most teams from being able to run on us. However, we'd put ALL the pressure on our LBs to make plays and provide the pass-rush. If Dallas feels they can really position Spencer to be a true pass-rush/playmaking threat, or upgrade the LB position with pass rushers and play-makers (Nick Perry, Bruce Irvin, ...) later in the draft, then I'd be for getting Brockers. [View Full Quote]
I don't want Brockers for our pick, but I also don't think "he's just another Spears." However, just the thought of adding another Spears-type of player to the d-line for the next 10 years made me chuckle.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #8
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,183
Default

Brockers is no way a mid 1st rd player. Just no way. He has no pass rush. He is not a threat like Poe to be able to swallow two blockers and still get a push or be disruptive in the middle. And when you throw in his putrid combine, anyone using a first on him is just plain stupid.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #9
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
Brockers is no way a mid 1st rd player. Just no way. He has no pass rush. He is not a threat like Poe to be able to swallow two blockers and still get a push or be disruptive in the middle. And when you throw in his putrid combine, anyone using a first on him is just plain stupid.
The only scary thing is the word 'potential'. There will be a team that takes him in the first round on this word alone.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #10
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marchetta View Post
As much as I dislike Brockers, I will give him this. He is truly the most stout guy on DL in this draft. He's virtually immovable without a double-team. He won't offer you much as a pass-rusher. But, you won't blow him off the LOS. He's virtually identical to Spears. If our 3-4 is truly designed for DEs to hold their position at the LOS, in order for the LBs to make plays, then Brockers' the man for us . We'd be getting a Spears clone, which would prevent most teams from being able to run on us. However, we'd put ALL the pressure on our LBs to make plays and provide the pass-rush. If Dallas feels they can really position Spencer to be a true pass-rush/playmaking threat, or upgrade the LB position with pass rushers and play-makers (Nick Perry, Bruce Irvin, ...) later in the draft, then I'd be for getting Brockers. [View Full Quote]
We need a NT as well to keep Lee and Carter free to make plays. That's going to be crucial going forward as those two players could be the strength of this defense.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #11
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Brockers is a beast and the tape wasn't unkind to him which is what the post was about. He is a Texan who has been 290 plus since he was 17.

Now he's settling in around 325 with solid athleticism.

He is Spears... plus 25 pounds of weight. That's simply a different type of player.

But it really doesnt matter for the Boys as he won't be there at 14. He is going to be very coveted.

Our only shot at a guy like this would be Poe who is even bigger but has lesser tape.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012   #12
JoeCorrado
Senior Member
 
JoeCorrado's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Aug 2006
Location:
Midwest
Posts:
1,968
Default

And for a couple of the others included:


Alabama DE/OLB Courtney Upshaw
Based on film study, we knew coming into the combine that Upshaw is not a great athlete, and he confirmed that by looking tight in drills, struggling to open his hips and change directions, and generally not looking smooth in space. However, he's not going to be asked to do those things in the NFL.
At 6-1⅝ and 272 pounds, Upshaw will set the edge against the run with natural leverage, good strength and plenty of smarts and toughness. He'll spot drop on occasion but won't be asked to match up in man coverage, and while he doesn't have elite quickness, his natural leverage and finishing power give him some pass-rush ability. Those qualities show up repeatedly on tape, and you can bet the Patriots, Miami Dolphins (No. 8), Arizona Cardinals (No. 13) and Baltimore Ravens (No. 29) have all taken notice.



Marshall DE Vinny Curry
Curry (6-3⅛, 266) didn't time well (4.98 40, 4.4 short shuttle, 6.9 three-cone), but he's like Upshaw in that his tape already shows he's not a great athlete. Curry is also tight in space, but he's a solid overall player who wins with strength, power and his motor. His first step is not elite, but he has enough explosiveness to set up speed-to-power moves; he uses his hands well and can set the edge as a run defender. He also flashes the ability to penetrate and get after the passer, and his leadership and character are unquestioned.
Curry reminds me of Jarret Johnson (fourth round, 2003), who has become a valued contributor for the Ravens, and Curry could be a good pickup in the second or third round. The 34th overall pick to the Indianapolis Colts might be a little rich, but with new head coach Chuck Pagano bringing a new defensive philosophy to Indy, there could be some interest early in the third from the Colts. Otherwise, expect the New York Jets (No. 48) and the Ravens (No. 52) to have Curry on their radar.

JoeCorrado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012   #13
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell View Post
Brockers is a beast and the tape wasn't unkind to him which is what the post was about. He is a Texan who has been 290 plus since he was 17.

Now he's settling in around 325 with solid athleticism.

He is Spears... plus 25 pounds of weight. That's simply a different type of player.

But it really doesnt matter for the Boys as he won't be there at 14. He is going to be very coveted.

Our only shot at a guy like this would be Poe who is even bigger but has lesser tape.
Solid athletes don't deserve First Rd picks
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com