Would you make this trade at #11?

[blindzebra]

Mike Williams is there, and Pittsburgh offers picks #30, #62, and their first in 2006 to move to #11.

[Rack Bauer]

Originally Posted by blindzebra

Mike Williams is there, and Pittsburgh offers picks #30, #62, and their first in 2006 to move to #11.

Dang.... that's a tough one. REAL tough one.


I think I might pass and take MW though.

[Canadian BoyzFan]

I would do it this trade if the only offer, however I would look for other options with a higher first round pick than 30.

I am sure Carolina would give Williams a serious look.

[Q_the_man]

Points don't add up. because Pitt 2 first will be around 29 next year too..

But Mike Williams. I say grab MW, tough decision but grab MW upside to to to high.....

[trickblue]

You need to add "Hell Yes" as an option...

[blindzebra]

Originally Posted by Q_the_man

Points don't add up. because Pitt 2 first will be around 29 next year too..

But Mike Williams. I say grab MW, tough decision but grab MW upside to to to high.....

Pick #11 is worth 1250 points.

#30 is worth 650, #62 is worth 290, next year's first is valued at mid second THIS YEAR or 430 = 1370.

[Portland Fanatic]

Tough call, but yes I pull the trigger and make the trade. Look at Roddy White at #30...then hope for nice WR class next yr...we know the DT class will be deep next yr.

[Canadian BoyzFan]

Originally Posted by Q_the_man

Points don't add up. because Pitt 2 first will be around 29 next year too..

But Mike Williams. I say grab MW, tough decision but grab MW upside to to to high.....

Next year's class should be a good one. I like getting depth this year and with 2 firsts next year perhaps trading up to get that 1 real difference maker of a player.

[LA=Pancakemaker]

You need to add "Hell Yes" as an option

AND HELL NO!

[Cajuncowboy]

No Way! A Mike Williams comes along once in a blue moon. If MW is there that means the football gods have smiled on you and you don't slap the football gods in the face when they give you a gift. That said, if he's there I would be shocked. But I would take him if he's there.

[cobra]

2 late first round picks and a 2nd round pick should be three starters. But we are giving up a starter (#11) this year, so we would be netting two extra starters.

I would most likely do it.

The question would be, could you get a guy like Roddy White at #30? If so, then is the guaranteed difference in value between MW and RW more than the value of two starters? I would guess no. Since there are no guarentees that MW will be great, I think the chance to pick up two additional starters while taking a step down to Roddy White would be worth it.

I say all of this even conceding that MW would probably be my #1 selection for the Cowboys this year. But that offer may be too much to pass up on.

[Qwickdraw]

faster than you can say "Ron Mexico".

lol

(for those who dont know, that's Michael Vick's alias he uses when visiting the doctor for Herpes treatments... seriously.)

[JohnsKey19]

I'd do it. Although i'm sure more(perhaps better) trade offers would be available to the Boys if Mike Williams dropped that far.

It's a win-win deal either way if MW or even one of the QBs drop to our pick. It adds value to our slot.

[blindzebra]

Originally Posted by cobra

2 late first round picks and a 2nd round pick should be three starters. But we are giving up a starter (#11) this year, so we would be netting two extra starters.

I would most likely do it.

The question would be, could you get a guy like Roddy White at #30? If so, then is the guaranteed difference in value between MW and RW more than the value of two starters? I would guess no. Since there are no guarentees that MW will be great, I think the chance to pick up two additional starters while taking a step down to Roddy White would be worth it.

I say all of this even conceding that MW would probably be my #1 selection for the Cowboys this year. But that offer may be too much to pass up on.

Actually this trade gives us #20 and #30 in the first and #42 and #62 in the second, so we have 4 chances to add starters in the first two rounds plus a 2nd first in 2006.

Also with Glenn and Key coming back along with Morgan, it is unlikely...especially with Parcells...that Williams is more than our #3 WR in 2005, so we 'd not be drafting a probable starter at #11 anyway.

[Hiero]

Nooooooooooooo way.