Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2012   #16
GloryDaysRBack
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,096
Default

Just to play along..what players could be potential trade material?
Assuming Claiborne is the target

Felix
Jenkins

Anyone else?
GloryDaysRBack is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #17
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
Maybe there is a player trade and the pick?

Mike Jenkins? Felix Jones? Both contracts are very friendly.
That would make more sense.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #18
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
Maybe there is a player trade and the pick?

Mike Jenkins? Felix Jones? Both contracts are very friendly.
Would make more sense that way
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #19
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

I could see Jenkins and Jones being traded but would still have to give up some picks.
the 14th, Jenkins, and Jones is really 3 first round picks for one.

But I bet the Browns will still want another pick.
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #20
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack View Post
Just to play along..what players could be potential trade material?
Assuming Claiborne is the target

Felix
Jenkins

Anyone else?
Those 2 guys and Dez are the only realy trade value players we have because of their youth and contracts.

I don't think Scandrick offers near enough quality to move us up.


If they want Richardson than I think getting Jenkins plus our 1st rounder is a great deal for them.

They come out of round 1 with a Pro Bowl Corner and Trent Richardson....
CATCH17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #21
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,181
Default

Jerruh really needs to fire that janitor.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #22
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supercowboy8 View Post
I could see Jenkins and Jones being traded but would still have to give up some picks.
the 14th, Jenkins, and Jones is really 3 first round picks for one.

But I bet the Browns will still want another pick.
We'd be getting screwed if we give them both players and the pick.

1 of the players + our pick is a fare deal.

I might even throw in a 2013 4th.


Giving up Jones, Jenkins, and pick 14 would be robbery for the Browns.

Last edited by CATCH17 : 03-28-2012 at 04:30 PM.
CATCH17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #23
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

Agreed. It would most likely be Jenkins + 14, and another pick later in the draft, maybe a 3rd or a high one in 2013. Doubt it'd be both players. The team doesn't want to create more holes in the process of patching them up. Though number 4 is high and if the Cowboys were desperate enough to move up that high, the Browns would make them pay.

On the Browns end of things, I'd imagine they want to get Tannehill, just not at #4.
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #24
jblaze2004
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2004
Posts:
7,345
Default

why move up to draft a cb at 4? Claiborne is good and all but i don't think he is rated better than peterson who went 5 to cardinals. Especially since we just signed a cb to a big deal and still have jenkins and scandy (who we resigned). We need to fill other holes now. I rather not make that trade. We need passrush now. We are lucky ware hasn't missed many games because of injury.
jblaze2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #25
SDogo
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
 
SDogo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Falconer, NY
Posts:
13,894
Default

Hmmm, interesting.

I cant add much to the rumor but that site and Esch are gaining steam around the NFL. I know for a fact the Browns, Bills and Panthers have expressed interest in their board and services and from what I understand the Cowboys will be possibly be using them this year for the first time.
Quote:
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
SDogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #26
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jblaze2004 View Post
why move up to draft a cb at 4? Claiborne is good and all but i don't think he is rated better than peterson who went 5 to cardinals. Especially since we just signed a cb to a big deal and still have jenkins and scandy (who we resigned). We need to fill other holes now. I rather not make that trade. We need passrush now. We are lucky ware hasn't missed many games because of injury.
He's a better pure corner coming out of college than Peterson and his style fits Robs defense.


I love the player but I also like Jenkins and think i'd go with Jenkins and draft a front 7 player.
CATCH17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #27
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
Those 2 guys and Dez are the only realy trade value players we have because of their youth and contracts.

I don't think Scandrick offers near enough quality to move us up.


If they want Richardson than I think getting Jenkins plus our 1st rounder is a great deal for them.

They come out of round 1 with a Pro Bowl Corner and Trent Richardson....
Plus they would have the 22nd pick still in hand.

Having said all that, I don't see this trade happening at all.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #28
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
He's a better pure corner coming out of college than Peterson and his style fits Robs defense.


I love the player but I also like Jenkins and think i'd go with Jenkins and draft a front 7 player.
Me too.

I think if we stay put at 14, we can end up with a very good player.

And if we trade back to around 22, I still think we can end up with a very good player plus an extra pick.

Given that we could use one more interior OL, 3rd WR, TE depth, OLB, S, CB depth, DL and ILB depth, I'd prefer not to lose more picks/players.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #29
jblaze2004
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2004
Posts:
7,345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
He's a better pure corner coming out of college than Peterson and his style fits Robs defense.


I love the player but I also like Jenkins and think i'd go with Jenkins and draft a front 7 player.
this.

or maybe after have talks with jenkins agent they feel that he is asking way too much and rather move up and have the corner situation locked up or 4+ years hopefully, and let someone else deal with jenkins and his agent aka part of the trade to browns??????
jblaze2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012   #30
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
1-star thread
Posts:
32,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDogo View Post
Hmmm, interesting.

I cant add much to the rumor but that site and Esch are gaining steam around the NFL. I know for a fact the Browns, Bills and Panthers have expressed interest in their board and services and from what I understand the Cowboys will be possibly be using them this year for the first time.
Using them for what?
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com