Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-31-2012   #16
Hailmary
Senior Member
 
Hailmary's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Posts:
2,185
Default

Never understood why some of these kids don't try to transfer to division-I schools.
Hailmary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012   #17
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyjoe View Post
Fiedorowicz stands out at pro days
Created: Saturday, March 31, 2012 12:07 a.m. CDT
Comments (0)
http://www.nwherald.com/2012/03/31/f...-days/ctu6n25/
Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa
At 6-foot-7 and 265 pounds, Kyle Fiedorowicz has little problem getting noticed.

....

Earlier this month, Fiedorowicz stood out for NFL scouts while competing at pro days at Northwestern and Northern Illinois.

Fiedorowicz ran the 40-yard dash in 4.67 seconds, posted a broad jump of 9-5 and a vertical leap of 28 inches.
NFL Draft Scout has some rather different numbers from those reported workouts... they have him running the 40 in 4.95 seconds, the 9-5 broad jump is correct and his vertical jump was 27 and a half inches... FWIW, he did 18 reps at 225 pounds in the bench press...

That's a big discrepancy in the reported 40 times... wonder which one is accurate??
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012   #18
BAT
Mr. Fixit
 
BAT's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Posts:
6,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btcutter View Post
No thanks.

Reminds me of David Lafleur.
LOL. Thought the same thing when I first saw him. Similar stiff gait and size. But this kid is faster.

Is he as tough as a blocker is the question.
"Our guys are gonna be good, and we know it. So that ain't talkin'. That's just the (bleepin') way it is."

Rob Ryan, Dallas Cowboys DC
BAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #19
SDogo
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
 
SDogo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Falconer, NY
Posts:
13,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAT View Post

Is he as tough as a blocker is the question.
He needs work. Like most small school prospects he lacks in the technique but he has the want to. He was not asked to do a lot of it and when he did the effort was good, the result was often positive but the process was sloppy and we will get eaten alive in the pro's. He has the receiving skills and zone awareness to contribute right away as a receiver in limited packages but he's raw and I dont think your going to get a lot out of him in the 1st year.
Quote:
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
SDogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #20
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,586
Default

I'm not really impressed with that video of him. He looks like he's got better hips than Bennett but he's not really running routes in any of those plays, he's not battling anyone for the ball and his primary advantage seemed to be defenders biting heavily on play fakes, the ability to make wide open catches and the fact that he was 5 inches taller and 60 lbs heavier than anyone that tries to stop him.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #21
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,235
Default

On the video he doesn't look very fluid which concerns me.

I really don't think he is going to be much of a receiving threat at the next level.
Eskimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #22
coyboy
Senior Member
 
coyboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
112
Default

Looks good to me
coyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #23
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo View Post
On the video he doesn't look very fluid which concerns me.

I really don't think he is going to be much of a receiving threat at the next level.
He looks more fluid than Bennett ever looked, and we spent a 2nd round pick on him.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #24
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
He looks more fluid than Bennett ever looked, and we spent a 2nd round pick on him.
That was also a mistake. What's that saying about two wrongs?

Anyhow, Bennett was a devastating blocker who the Cowboys FO thought they could convert into a good receiver. Bennett delivered in spades on the blocking part so the Cowboys only have themselves to blame on this one. I actually think they compounded the error of not drafting him with the error of not re-signing him. He was a really, really good run blocker. Given that we want to run the ball and play a lot of 2-TE sets I think the FO dropped the ball again.
Eskimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #25
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo View Post
That was also a mistake. What's that saying about two wrongs?

Anyhow, Bennett was a devastating blocker who the Cowboys FO thought they could convert into a good receiver. Bennett delivered in spades on the blocking part so the Cowboys only have themselves to blame on this one. I actually think they compounded the error of not drafting him with the error of not re-signing him. He was a really, really good run blocker. Given that we want to run the ball and play a lot of 2-TE sets I think the FO dropped the ball again.
I don't think Bennett wanted to re-sign with the Cowboys.

He was looking forward to moving on, imo. Wanted a chance to start, etc.

One of those somewhat rare instances where a Cowboys player didn't want to stay with the organization.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #26
newlander
Senior Member
 
newlander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2006
Posts:
7,660
Default sad but true....

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsterD View Post
I know a lot of Cowboys fans including myself don't want to think this, but it is true, I see him declining already.

....feel bad he hasnt won anything notable
newlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #27
fortdick
Senior Member
 
fortdick's Avatar
Years Donated
2006, 2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
5,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyjoe View Post
OK, watch this tape and u tell me!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWtSxxyyeQ4
I think they have a rule in that conference that the SS is supposed to ignore the TE.

He runs that "Y fly" and no one is near him.
fortdick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012   #28
BAT
Mr. Fixit
 
BAT's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Posts:
6,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDogo View Post
He needs work. Like most small school prospects he lacks in the technique but he has the want to. He was not asked to do a lot of it and when he did the effort was good, the result was often positive but the process was sloppy and we will get eaten alive in the pro's. He has the receiving skills and zone awareness to contribute right away as a receiver in limited packages but he's raw and I dont think your going to get a lot out of him in the 1st year.
So he's more like Chandler then. Great size but better receiver than blocker. Fiedorowicz sounds like an interesting UDFA project. Would rather take the more athletic and physical blocker in James Hanna from OKL with a late day pick (6th or 7th).
"Our guys are gonna be good, and we know it. So that ain't talkin'. That's just the (bleepin') way it is."

Rob Ryan, Dallas Cowboys DC
BAT is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com