Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2012   #16
Avery
The Dog that Saved Charleston
 
Avery's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Herriman, UT
Posts:
7,159
Default

Nope - I'm perfectly happy not to move up for anyone in this draft.
Avery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #17
JBell523
That's my Quarterback
 
JBell523's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
On a horse
Posts:
2,884
Default

ITT: lots of zoners who didn't catch the joke
JBell523 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #18
DWAREZ
Senior Member
 
DWAREZ's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
NC
Posts:
2,780
Star

No moving up for me for any prospect in round one!
DWAREZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #19
CowboyFan74
NFC Beast Champs
 
CowboyFan74's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Bedford, TX
Posts:
11,212
Send a message via AIM to CowboyFan74 Send a message via MSN to CowboyFan74 Send a message via Yahoo to CowboyFan74
Default

Nope....
CowboyFan74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #20
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,593
Default

Nope, I like him but I don't think he's JJ Watt like a lot of people want to believe.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #21
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,730
Default

I think you could go down for Cox to pick #18.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #22
dools
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
I wouldn't move up for any player not named Andrew Luck.
That just seems dumb to me. You never know who could fall to what round. If the team feels someone is a great value, trading up is always a good option because you are getting the player you want. When you trade down you hope a player falls.
dools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #23
Wulfman
Unofficial GM
 
Wulfman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dools View Post
That just seems dumb to me. You never know who could fall to what round. If the team feels someone is a great value, trading up is always a good option because you are getting the player you want. When you trade down you hope a player falls.
We're talking about moving up in the first round in the draft, not in the draft as a whole.
"Contrary to popular opinion, you CAN lead a horse to water AND make him drink...you just have to hold his head under water long enough."

- Wulf
Wulfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #24
dools
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wulfman View Post
We're talking about moving up in the first round in the draft, not in the draft as a whole.
That's fair but he said he would not trade up for ANY player not named Andrew Luck. I took it as, in general, he is against the idea of trading up.
dools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012   #25
Wulfman
Unofficial GM
 
Wulfman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dools View Post
That's fair but he said he would not trade up for ANY player not named Andrew Luck. I took it as, in general, he is against the idea of trading up.
That may well be what he meant. I just took it as meaning only the first round since that was the original topic of discussion. I'm sure he'll correct me if I was mistaken.
"Contrary to popular opinion, you CAN lead a horse to water AND make him drink...you just have to hold his head under water long enough."

- Wulf
Wulfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #26
garyv
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Posts:
1,340
Default No

Not moving up for anyone in this Draft it costs too much and I like what will be there @ #14 and #45
garyv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #27
kmd24
Senior Member
 
kmd24's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,436
Default

It depends on who you think will be available later. The difference between Cox and some of the other DL isn't as big as the difference between Barron and the other safeties. I'd be content to select Barron at 14 and see who falls to me at 45.

FWIW, I also think that the difference between Barron and the other safeties on the roster is greater than the difference between Cox and the other DL on the roster, so he'd have more impact early on.
kmd24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #28
Doomsday
Rising Star
 
Doomsday's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Denver, CO
Posts:
9,843
Default

Depends on how far you have to move up and what it would cost. If they are that high on him and he is some how there at around 11 it might be worth it.

Doomsday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #29
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,308
Default

Cox will go at 4.

He is that good and that coveted.

He is elite talent.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012   #30
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,256
Default

I would rather move down than to move up for any player.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com