
|
04-20-2012
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 13,340 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Most likely they had a scholarship Junior or Senior there when he arrived and needed a RG.
|
And with a Wisconsin begining as well, both Peter Konz and Kevin Zeitler would have the ability to man the complete offensive line's interior.
There's no right way to do the wrong thing.
To compete for the playoffs, Dallas has to improve here: Only four sacks against Eli Manning over the past six games!
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 1,585 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAT
Cowboys should swoop in and take Coples in that scenario. A double digit sack DE is much more valuable than a good S.
|
Double digit sacker in a 3-4? Very doubtful.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#18
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOY3141
Gotcha. I would hope that the homework has been done. Would hate to draft someone at 14 and have them switch positions and find out it doesn't work.
On the other hand, he would just move over to guard and compete with the other 4 we already have.
|
Bernadeau also can play Center, and I wouldn't sleep on us drafting Blake in the 4th. We really do like him.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 2,529 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Bernadeau also can play Center, and I wouldn't sleep on us drafting Blake in the 4th. We really do like him.
|
I have Blake in all my mocks. I would see us trading down in the 3rd and grabbing him. I think he and Broyles are pet cats of the front office.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 5,257 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fffiasco
if barron and cox go before our pick...
does decastro become the next favorite?
would kuechly have any chance of being the pick?
|
If both are gone, the Cowboys are probably trying like heck to get out of the 14th pick and down somewhere late in the 1st. Everything I'm reading says there really isn't much difference between 10-30. Obviously there would have to be a player on the board at #14 that another team really likes to make a trade scenario even possible.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2005 |
Posts: | 1,549 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Rod
If Barron goes before Dallas picks then it means another player falls. Could end up being DeCastro and I would be totally fine with that.
|
I think DeCastro will be later than our pick anyway.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Sep 2004 |
Location: | San Jose, Ca |
Posts: | 756 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Bernadeau also can play Center, and I wouldn't sleep on us drafting Blake in the 4th. We really do like him.
|
If we got DeCastro, I would rather move this guy. I would think it would be a little easier on a rookie to come in and play the position he has been playing for the past few years.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2011 |
Posts: | 478 |
|
i think we're fine. if all the hype is about Barron and Cox who teams are supposedly willing to trade up for, someone that was in that original top 10 would have to fall to us.
and i'm curious to know how many of these guys who slip in the drafts, and who gain a lot of media notoriety for taking plays off, or for a questionable motor, etc. how many of these guys actually prove the draft experts wrong in the actual nfl? think i'll make this a thread to get some answers.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#24
|
|
Moderator
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 29,589 |
|
As has been discussed previously, I think that the Cowboys plan might be Cox, Barron, trade down, DeCastro, in that order.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Posts: | 15,405 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Bernadeau also can play Center, and I wouldn't sleep on us drafting Blake in the 4th. We really do like him.
|
I don't anticipate Blake being there in the fourth round. I think we'll have to take him in round 3 if we want him.
"I don't understand it Stephen, it's opening day 2014, where is everybody?"
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#26
|
|
Penguinite
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 16,302 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Bernadeau also can play Center, and I wouldn't sleep on us drafting Blake in the 4th. We really do like him.
|
I believe we'd go Bern at OC and DeCastro at OG. He is the best pulling guard available. And we do like our screen and swing pass game under Garrett.
That would make for a salty OL. I think Livings and Bern are underrated signings.
Still not sure we'd go DeCastro before a trade down however.
Trade down w/ Pats and get Konz at OC is lesser than the DeCastro line but not remarkably so and we can pull a rotational front 7 guy for the defense still.
Perry, McClellin or Mercilus would be a heck of a 3rd down rush player who could grow into much more.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2008 |
Posts: | 1,654 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDogo
Hottest name in the draft right now with McClellin
|
You are not kidding either. There has been a lot of buzz about him in the first round. McShay believes he is a first round lock and a number of other people close to teams believe that it is unlikely he makes it out of the top 20.
At that moment a voice came over me and said, Look up, get up, and don't ever give up. You tell everyone or anyone that has ever doubted, thought they did not measure up or wanted to quit, you tell them to look up, get up and don't ever give up. - Michael Irvin
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2008 |
Posts: | 1,654 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOY3141
I think DeCastro will be at #14 regardless. I think if he is there, they try and move back. If they can't then he would be the pick.
1st option: Cox
2nd option: barron
3rd option: trade back
4th option: DeCastro
|
Not the order I would personally choose, but I am very content with these 4 options.
At that moment a voice came over me and said, Look up, get up, and don't ever give up. You tell everyone or anyone that has ever doubted, thought they did not measure up or wanted to quit, you tell them to look up, get up and don't ever give up. - Michael Irvin
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#29
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell
I believe we'd go Bern at OC and DeCastro at OG. He is the best pulling guard available. And we do like our screen and swing pass game under Garrett.
That would make for a salty OL. I think Livings and Bern are underrated signings.
Still not sure we'd go DeCastro before a trade down however.
Trade down w/ Pats and get Konz at OC is lesser than the DeCastro line but not remarkably so and we can pull a rotational front 7 guy for the defense still.
Perry, McClellin or Mercilus would be a heck of a 3rd down rush player who could grow into much more.
|
I hope you are right about that. We needed 3 starters on the OL.
|
|
|
04-20-2012
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 23,316 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY
As has been discussed previously, I think that the Cowboys plan might be Cox, Barron, trade down, DeCastro, in that order.
|
I can't help to think that Garrett really likes DeCastro. Great prospect from one of the top academic schools in the nation. You get a smart guy like that who is an outstanding player ... coaches dream right there
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.
|