
|
04-22-2012
|
#1
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
For Those Who Want Barron
I have been told he is not going to get past Seattle at 12. If the Cowboys want him, they will have to move up.
Can you imagine Barron and Thomas in the same Safety sets?
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2011 |
Posts: | 2,511 |
|
The Seahawks already have a decent secondary, too. Gonna be fun to watch them two play.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
Oh well.
That stinks.
I hope DeCastro is there then (though I'm really starting to wonder even if we'll pick him at 14).
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#4
|
|
Bi-polar? I'm Bi-winning, I've got Tigers blood and Adonis DNA!!
Joined: | Feb 2010 |
Location: | Tyler,Tx |
Posts: | 2,240 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I have been told he is not going to get past Seattle at 12. If the Cowboys want him, they will have to move up.
Can you imagine Barron and Thomas in the same Safety sets?
|
Who drops?
What do u think the boys will do?
Stay put, trade up or down?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameover
Romo is 100% the main problem.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameover
I see a team that could finish 4-12.
|
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2007 |
Posts: | 1,423 |
|
Lol. Have fun paying two first round contracts to both your safties
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Kingston Canada |
Posts: | 6,580 |
|
I like Barron alot, but I do not want us to trade up for him.
Lots of depth in this draft and I'd prefer to let the draft come to us.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaede
I like Barron alot, but I do not want us to trade up for him.
Lots of depth in this draft and I'd prefer to let the draft come to us.
|
Definitely.
Even with what we did in FA, we still have a couple needs and must improve the overall talent level of this team.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 3,293 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I have been told he is not going to get past Seattle at 12. If the Cowboys want him, they will have to move up.
Can you imagine Barron and Thomas in the same Safety sets?
|
Told by whom?
GM? Scout? Admin Assistant? I don't want a name and email.... but who?
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
On a side note, I may have to bring down my expectations for Round 1 at least . . . . It really could be Brockers.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#10
|
|
Pixel Pusher
Joined: | Aug 2007 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 19,590 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian BoyzFan
Told by whom?
GM? Scout? Admin Assistant? I don't want a name and email.... but who?
|
Yeah this is curious considering Cam Chancellor played well for them, is cheaper and their secondary is already pretty decent.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
Last edited by TheCount : 04-22-2012 at 12:34 PM.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#11
|
|
The Excellence of Execution
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 7,752 |
|
Trade next year's 3rd to move up in front of Seattle. We need Barron.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2011 |
Posts: | 2,092 |
|
I'd move up to 11 to get him only 3 spots and wouldn't cost much. But question is do the cowboys really want him???

Austin 3:16
Says The Cowboys Will Whip Your ***
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#13
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,253 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian BoyzFan
Told by whom?
GM? Scout? Admin Assistant? I don't want a name and email.... but who?
|
Someone with the Seahawks.
By the way please take this with a grain of salt.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 3,293 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Someone with the Seahawks.
|
OK thanks.
|
|
|
04-22-2012
|
#15
|
|
Surrealist
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 43,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount
Yeah this is curious consider Cam Chancellor played well for them, is cheaper and their secondary is already pretty decent.
|
Yeah, reading a couple Seahawks forums and he doesn't really seem to be on their radar.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.
|