Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2012   #1
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Star Mock Me Amadeus

Well, it's the day before the longest day of the year, Christmas Eve in April. By the way, since tomorrow is our Christmas Eve and Thursday our Christmas I think it sucks that we have to wait until Prime Time to open our presents and have to watch so many people open theirs before we get to open ours.

This last mock is a mixture of my own feelings and what I think Dallas is looking at based on reports, etc.

Well, I have come full circle on what I think Dallas is going to do. As I sit here right now I believe if Fletcher Cox were available he would be our pick. I also don't believe he gets out of the top 10 now. Which brings me to Mark Barron. For the last couple of weeks I have insisted he is the guy I believe we will pick, and I stand by that, but I also believe he is going to be gone before we pick.

That brings me back to David DeCastro. His visit wowed some people. He's intelligent, driven, and talented. Therefore...

#14. David DeCastro, OG, Stanford, 6'5", 315.
While I firmly believe the Cowboys want to go Defense with this pick, I also am convinced that if the two guys they want are gone they will either take the best player on their board, which is DeCastro, or they will trade down. I am happy with either option. If DeCastro is also gone I suspect they will try to trade down and if they can't then they'd take Michael Brockers. DeCastro is our starting Center or RG with Bernadeau taking over at Center.

#45. Jared Crick, DE, Nebraska, 6'4", 280. I believe he has a chance to be the best 3-4 DE in this draft class because of his work ethic and motor. Were he not injured in 2011 he is probably a top 15 pick. I compare him to Justin Smith of the 49ers. Look at the havoc he creates. Crick does the same when you watch him. He simply gives OTs fits because he never stops attacking. Starts day 1 opposite Lissemore.

#81. Casey Hayward, CB, Vanderbilt, 5'11", 192.
While I do believe we would have loved Barron, I don't think we like the rest of the Safeties all that much, and won't take one before round 4 at best. So we will focus on CB depth to build for the future. Heyward has the kind of intangibles coaches love. First of all he has some swagger and at CB that helps. He is intelligent and works hard. he finds the football. 15 INTs at Vandy. Could start one day.

#113. Ryan Broyles, WR, Oklahoma, 5'10", 192. He could go much sooner, but the all time NCAA receiving leader is being held back by injury, or pushed up by potential. He is a perfect fit for Tony Romo and Jason Garrett and I wouldn't be surprised if we moved back into the 3rd to take him. We may not look WR at all given the confidence Romo has in Holmes, but if this kid is there I can't see us passing on him. If he is gone watch for T. Y. Hilton and him to be used on Kickoffs. Pure speed.

#135. Antonio Allen, SS, South Carolina, 6'2", 210.
While he is not Mark Barron, he is a productive football player. His Senior saw good production in particular. He forces fumbles, picks off passes and wraps up on tackles. He won't shirk Special teams duties and he is very good on Safety blitzes.

#152. Tank Carder, ILB, TCU, 6'2", 236. He attacks the football. That is the best thing you can say about a 3-4 ILB. Has a great motor and attitude. Will make a mark on Special Teams and with his limited opportunities at first. Smart, instinctive football player who just wants to win.

#186. Hebron Fangupo, NT, BYU, 6'1", 325. The only negative you will ever hear about this guy is that he is only 6'1". He is a bull. I am convinced this is the best NT in this draft. Why isn't he higher? Simply put he never played in the same place two years in a row so scouting on him is jumbled. He has the kind of motor, girth, and run stuffing ability that turns a player into an eventual starter. Great teammate who lifts other guys around him all the time. My pet cat in this draft. I'd take him much higher if I could.

#222. Drew Butler, P, Georgia, 6'1", 203. I hate taking Ks or Ps in any Draft, but the fact is we need one. I prefer Anger out of Cal, but he will go a quite a bit earlier. Takes the job from Chris Jones. Just pin them deep and it helps this team big time.

Well, there you have it, a Defense heavy Draft that fills all needs except 3rd string QB and TE.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #2
Sasquatch
Lost in the Woods
 
Sasquatch's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Posts:
4,218
Default

So this is it, huh? I'm thinking Decastro is our likely "consolatoin" prize, too, which is hardly a bad thing.

Have we shown any interest in Crick?
Sasquatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #3
basstapp
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2009
Location:
Atlanta
Posts:
860
Default

I love it, I think if we trade down and get an extra 4th or 5th then we should select Russel Wilson or Nick Foles. I think we can find an UDFA that can fill out our 3rd TE need and go into the season without a lot of holes.
basstapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #4
SDogo
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
 
SDogo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Falconer, NY
Posts:
13,894
Default

Problem is you got the Brockers and DeCastro situation reversed. It's becoming evident that Brockers is the 3rd option and DeCastro is the trade back option.

I'm sorry I want DeCastro as well but everything I hear says he is the "if all else fails" option.
Quote:
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
SDogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #5
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch View Post
So this is it, huh? I'm thinking Decastro is our likely "consolatoin" prize, too, which is hardly a bad thing.

Have we shown any interest in Crick?
Yeah, he came in for a visit.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #6
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDogo View Post
Problem is you got the Brockers and DeCastro situation reversed. It's becoming evident that Brockers is the 3rd option and DeCastro is the trade back option.

I'm sorry I want DeCastro as well but everything I hear says he is the "if all else fails" option.
I don't think I do man. I have heard the interest in Brockers too, but I think they go for the better player. DeCastro did impress.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #7
visionary
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
4,479
Default

this is the sort of non-sexy, lunch pail draft that sets teams up for the future

i take it in a heart beat

only change i would make is

113: Phillip Blake (OC)
135 or 152: TY Hilton
visionary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #8
Fredd
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
NE Penna (18704)
Posts:
556
Default

Brockers is one of the those "lots-o-potential" guys and thus, to me, he is scary...I still want Coples despite the bad press on him but if the choices are DeCastro of Brockers, you GOTTA go DeCastro...if Cox is there, he is the guy even if Barron or DeCastro are there as well (IMO)
Fredd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #9
SDogo
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
 
SDogo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Falconer, NY
Posts:
13,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
I don't think I do man. I have heard the interest in Brockers too, but I think they go for the better player. DeCastro did impress.
Fair enough, I'm not 100% sold either way, I think after Barron and Cox it could get a little dicey. I hope your right.
Quote:
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
SDogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #10
Sasquatch
Lost in the Woods
 
Sasquatch's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Posts:
4,218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
Yeah, he came in for a visit.
Dang, don't know how I missed that. Glad to hear it.
Sasquatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #11
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
I don't think I do man. I have heard the interest in Brockers too, but I think they go for the better player. DeCastro did impress.
I really hope you're right between DeCastro vs. Brockers.
Woods is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #12
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,705
Default

#14. David DeCastro, OG, Stanford, 6'5", 315. While I firmly believe the Cowboys want to go Defense with this pick, I also am convinced that if the two guys they want are gone they will either take the best player on their board, which is DeCastro, or they will trade down. I am happy with either option. If DeCastro is also gone I suspect they will try to trade down and if they can't then they'd take Michael Brockers. DeCastro is our starting Center or RG with Bernadeau taking over at Center.
No-brainer pick if available.

#45. Jared Crick, DE, Nebraska, 6'4", 280. I believe he has a chance to be the best 3-4 DE in this draft class because of his work ethic and motor. Were he not injured in 2011 he is probably a top 15 pick. I compare him to Justin Smith of the 49ers. Look at the havoc he creates. Crick does the same when you watch him. He simply gives OTs fits because he never stops attacking. Starts day 1 opposite Lissemore.
I think there will be many better players available at this pick.

#81. Casey Hayward, CB, Vanderbilt, 5'11", 192. While I do believe we would have loved Barron, I don't think we like the rest of the Safeties all that much, and won't take one before round 4 at best. So we will focus on CB depth to build for the future. Heyward has the kind of intangibles coaches love. First of all he has some swagger and at CB that helps. He is intelligent and works hard. he finds the football. 15 INTs at Vandy. Could start one day.
Is he physical enough to play press man coverage or is he a finesse player like T-New?

#113. Ryan Broyles, WR, Oklahoma, 5'10", 192. He could go much sooner, but the all time NCAA receiving leader is being held back by injury, or pushed up by potential. He is a perfect fit for Tony Romo and Jason Garrett and I wouldn't be surprised if we moved back into the 3rd to take him. We may not look WR at all given the confidence Romo has in Holmes, but if this kid is there I can't see us passing on him. If he is gone watch for T. Y. Hilton and him to be used on Kickoffs. Pure speed.
Love this pick!

#135. Antonio Allen, SS, South Carolina, 6'2", 210. While he is not Mark Barron, he is a productive football player. His Senior saw good production in particular. He forces fumbles, picks off passes and wraps up on tackles. He won't shirk Special teams duties and he is very good on Safety blitzes.
I would prefer Brandon Hardin at this pick.

#152. Tank Carder, ILB, TCU, 6'2", 236. He attacks the football. That is the best thing you can say about a 3-4 ILB. Has a great motor and attitude. Will make a mark on Special Teams and with his limited opportunities at first. Smart, instinctive football player who just wants to win.
Seems more like a run-and-hit 4-3 type of LB than a 3-4 stack-and-shedd type.

#186. Hebron Fangupo, NT, BYU, 6'1", 325. The only negative you will ever hear about this guy is that he is only 6'1". He is a bull. I am convinced this is the best NT in this draft. Why isn't he higher? Simply put he never played in the same place two years in a row so scouting on him is jumbled. He has the kind of motor, girth, and run stuffing ability that turns a player into an eventual starter. Great teammate who lifts other guys around him all the time. My pet cat in this draft. I'd take him much higher if I could.
Better than some of the much higher rated NT types in this draft, but much does he add much to the team over Josh Brent?

#222. Drew Butler, P, Georgia, 6'1", 203. I hate taking Ks or Ps in any Draft, but the fact is we need one. I prefer Anger out of Cal, but he will go a quite a bit earlier. Takes the job from Chris Jones.
Ican't really remember, was Chris Jones bad last year?
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #13
Mr Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Mr Cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,095
Default

If you look at Callahan's success running the ball in NY, it was because his dominant center. For that reason, I think DeCastro will be drafted as a center. He is the key to making Callahan's run game go. Mangold came in the first round, and I think Callahan will get his man here too.

Selecting Brockers if DeCastro is there is dafting for need and not BPA, which I think is a mistake.

In the second round, I could live with Crick, but would prefer Branch if he is available. I am convinced that some very, very good players, players that were thought to be in the 10-20 range will be available in the second round.

I could live with the rest of your draft, but I do question Broyles availability for this coming year. Will he be able to contribute this year or not? Will he need a year like Carter? If so, then we need to wait as long as we can to draft him. No more redshirts.
Mr Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #14
cbow44
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2011
Posts:
550
Default

I read somewhere that DeCastro was the #1 center recruit in the nation coming out of high school. Naturaly I cant find the link now.
cbow44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2012   #15
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,807
Default

Printed and saved Hos!

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com