Who did the worst today??

[DFWJC]

I vote Jenkins to SF or, value wise, Irvin to Seattle,

I can,t believe you included Gilmore on that list

[DFWJC]

Originally Posted by cowboysooner

The Bengals. They essentially traded DeCastro for #98 and Zeitler. I like Zeitler alot but I'd rather have DeCastro.

They did get Kirkpatrick in rd 1 too

[InmanRoshi]

You would think coming off a lockerroom implosion the Jets wouldd stay away from a player who quit on his team in college.

[ninja]

I would not be a happy camper if I were a Cleveland Brown fan right now.

They could have had Richardson at #4. No need to trade up imo.

And Weeden?

There is some reason Cleveland continues to suck year after year, no matter who the coach is, no matter who the GM is. I have no idea what that reason is, though.

Oh, well. Cleveland will have a do-over next year. They will be drafting again in the top 5.

[CowboyChris]

Originally Posted by DFWJC

I vote Jenkins to SF or, value wise, Irvin to Seattle,

I can,t believe you included Gilmore on that list

im just a little suprised he went in the top 10

[PullMyFinger]

Originally Posted by theogt

Giants picking David Wilson.

He was picked around where he was supposed to be picked, the kid can ball, I've seen him in person.

[bkight13]

Originally Posted by Wulfman

They actually gave up two 1st rounders and a second rounder, and swapped their own first rounder for the Rams'. Still, I agree it's a steep price for anyone.

That's still 3-1st rounders and a 2nd for 1-1st rounder. I've seen many people try to make your argument, but it's not correct. And it is still too steep, IMO.

[GermanCowboy]

Originally Posted by InmanRoshi

I think it depends on what kind of scheme you use. If you're using a staight ahead man blocking scheme, which the Bengals do, I actually liked Zeitler better than DeCastro as a pure in-line mauler. If you're going to have your linemen zoning, moving around and combo blocking, DeCastro was a much better player. Overall, I didn't see that large of a disparity between the two, despite DeCastro's hype.

I think you are dead-on regarding Zeitler. If you listen to Paul Alexander, the Bengals O-Line Coach, they never really thought about DeCastro but wanted Zeitler all along because of their scheme.

Apparently Zeitler is quite a good Center, too. They want Zeitler to be the starting RG and Backup-Center where DeCastro is a pure (but maybe better?) Guard.

If all that is the case, trading back makes perfect sense. But if DeCastro becomes a much better player than Zeitler and Pick #93 it will be a bad decision.

But that would be hindsight at this point.

[The Realist]

Poe, Irvin, Boise OLB/DE, Jenkins.....especially the last 3.

[rwalters31]

Originally Posted by StanleySpadowski

For where they were picking, Cincinatti screwed the pooch the worst after Seattle. Basically traded Decastro for Zeitler and a late rounder.

Cleveland also didn't let the board come to them. They were picking Weeden regardless of what happened and left some talent on the board. Kind of disappointing for them because they made Richardson happen.

You know what really toast my bacon, Pittsburgh gets the one player that makes them a pick for the Supper Bowl (I hate Pittsburgh).

Why do the rich get richer?????

[The Realist]

Originally Posted by rwalters31

You know what really toast my bacon, Pittsburgh gets the one player that makes them a pick for the Supper Bowl (I hate Pittsburgh).

Why do the rich get richer?????

Their tackles are absolutely awful.

[fanfromvirginia]

Tough choice -- thre were several true head scrachers. I will go with Seattle. That is hard to beat.

[GroundUp]

But Seattle by a landslide. Then maybe SF and Giants.

[Chuck 54]

Originally Posted by theogt

Giants picking David Wilson.

Check...decent back who fumbles a lot...they could have done better.

[Bowdown27]

I'm sorry but I know the rams stockpiled picks for today and years to come but dropped back to rom number 2 to 14 for brockers is to me a loss