Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-27-2012   #31
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
Really depends on who's there. I don't see a safety worth taking in this draft at this point, who is going to really be better than what we have? I think we can look forward to another temp solution at SS with Pool.
I agree, the value has to be there. I'm not sure what our board looks like.
I'm worried about center too and assume that Blake won't be there in the mid 4th, but then again, he could be.
DFWJC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #32
Tex
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep_Freeze View Post
Yeah, well I'm more in the middle on this one. We did make some upgrades on the oline also, even though most don't respect them, they might fit better with what Bill wants to do.

You did pick a NT, which is nice although I still don't think TRat should really play DE cause he doesn't match up as well against tackles as he does in the middle.

There are 2 starters that we still need to make an effort to get, a center and a DE. Both are still possible for us to get in this draft and if we need to move up to get one or both, I'm in total favor of it.

I just don't know if we should let needs at basically backup WR and TE get in the way of 2 guys that could actually start for this team at DE and C.......even if it costs a chance at Broyles. Giving up our 2nd pick lost us that luxury of both a TE and WR that early.
I like it. If one of the top 4 or 5 guards fell into the third I would be thrilled with that and blake. I like Broyles but still dont view our OL as fixed.
Tex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #33
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
Really depends on who's there. I don't see a safety worth taking in this draft at this point, who is going to really be better than what we have? I think we can look forward to another temp solution at SS with Pool.
Yeah I see DE and C (well interior OL) ahead of TE and WR right now.

I believe TE should be higher than WR cause good TEs are just harder to find. We can get a WR off the scrap heap like we did Robinson after cuts if need be, but TEs who can block and catch the occasional pass is much harder to find.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #34
Sam I Am
Unfriendly and Aloof!
 
Sam I Am's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2006
Location:
Betelgeuse
Posts:
30,975
Default

Sorry sb, but the Cowboys are going to trade back up into the second round. That's how baseball Jerry go.
Formerly the notorious nyc!

I've got more red flags than Soviet Russia!

There is a good chance that you don't like me, but there is a better chance that I don't care.

If I'm not insulting you, I'm probably not aware that you exist.



Jerry Jones in the draft room is suicide on the football field. The line of scrimmage is EVERYTHING. Something Jerry doesn't understand.
Sam I Am is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #35
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
I like it. If one of the top 4 or 5 guards fell into the third I would be thrilled with that and blake. I like Broyles but still dont view our OL as fixed.
True, depends on the guy there really, if Brooks is there I would probably pull the trigger, but we also need some youth on the DL.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #36
CCBoy
Senior Member
 
CCBoy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Posts:
13,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep_Freeze View Post
True, depends on the guy there really, if Brooks is there I would probably pull the trigger, but we also need some youth on the DL.

Agreed, and both an ILB and OLB.
There's no right way to do the wrong thing.

To compete for the playoffs, Dallas has to improve here: Only four sacks against Eli Manning over the past six games!
CCBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #37
Sitting Bull
Senior Member
 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Years Donated
2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Scottsdale, AZ
Posts:
1,433
Default

I like this mock and don't understand how drafting a WR is a luxury. Austin and Bryant have hardly ever been healthy on the field together in the past two seasons. Behind them we have group of unproven lottery tickets. Jerry doesn't like to sign free agent "progress-stopper" WR3s, and the odds of finding a street FA with the speed we covet is slim. I'm skeptical we'll break type and draft small. I get the feeling Jerry only drafts WRs he thinks have the potential, however small, to become WR1's. I like Brian Quick most for us, despite the fact that he isn't blazing fast (or quick), just productive.
Sitting Bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #38
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,500
Default

I'd love this. And it would put an end to people being upset about a lack of attention to the trenches.

There's a lot of draft left ahead of us, that's for sure.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #39
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sitting Bull View Post
I like this mock and don't understand how drafting a WR is a luxury. Austin and Bryant have hardly ever been healthy on the field together in the past two seasons. Behind them we have group of unproven lottery tickets. Jerry doesn't like to sign free agent "progress-stopper" WR3s, and the odds of finding a street FA with the speed we covet is slim. I'm skeptical we'll break type and draft small. I get the feeling Jerry only drafts WRs he thinks have the potential, however small, to become WR1's. I like Brian Quick most for us, despite the fact that he isn't blazing fast (or quick), just productive.
Well Robinson could've been considered a progress stopper last year.

It becomes a luxury only because we don't have a 2nd round pick anymore, and still have needs that a rookie could come in and start with alot more snaps.

A later pick of a WR would be good with someone who fell, or we could always sign our old friends Roy Williams or Crayton off the street if we want.....
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #40
Sitting Bull
Senior Member
 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
Years Donated
2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Scottsdale, AZ
Posts:
1,433
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep_Freeze View Post
Well Robinson could've been considered a progress stopper last year.

It becomes a luxury only because we don't have a 2nd round pick anymore, and still have needs that a rookie could come in and start with alot more snaps.

A later pick of a WR would be good with someone who fell, or we could always sign our old friends Roy Williams or Crayton off the street if we want.....
Robinson was not signed to be a WR3. If he was, we wouldn't have cut him and re-signed him (twice) in a roster bubble dance with Fiametta. Robinson was a winning lotto ticket and OTree was a bust.

I don't care what round we pick to address WR, but we need more options (including street FA) if we want the best odds of a WR3 emerging.

I do agree C and DE are important needs. I just don't want to pass on a Rd 3 BPA who happens to be WR just because we have those additional needs.
Sitting Bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #41
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sitting Bull View Post
Robinson was not signed to be a WR3. If he was, we wouldn't have cut him and re-signed him (twice) in a roster bubble dance with Fiametta. Robinson was a winning lotto ticket and OTree was a bust.

I don't care what round we pick to address WR, but we need more options (including street FA) if we want the best odds of a WR3 emerging.
Well we will roster churn regardless, watch the cuts (like we did with Robinson) and such so even if we don't pick another WR, they are easier to find than some other positions of need.

Robinson was signed as a WR3 though, don't think anyone would consider him over Miles or Dez.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #42
dez_for_prez
Senior Member
 
dez_for_prez's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2010
Location:
Halifax, Nova Sc
Posts:
973
Default

Would love to have Hanna, TE from Oklahomma in the 5th. I think he will turn to a stud.
dez_for_prez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #43
fifaguy
Senior Member
 
fifaguy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2011
Posts:
2,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbear View Post
You knew somebody had to do it... LOL...

With Claiborne on board, and no 2nd round pick, I'm not projecting them to make some move that gets them back into the 2nd round... I'd love to be wrong, though... so we start with the third round:

3) Ryan Broyles, WR, Oklahoma... 5-10, 195 pounds, 4.45 second 40... the NCAA's all-time receptions leader (349 catches) is the slot receiver of Jason Garrett's dreams...

4a) Philip Blake, C, Baylor... 6-2, 316 pounds, 5.2 second 40... it looks like Blake is the Cowboys' second choice at center, behind Peter Konz (who will be gone before they pick in the 3rd round)...

4b) Hebron Fangupo, NT, BYU... 6-1, 325 pounds, 5.15 second 40... this stumpy widebody is climbing the draft charts recently... after two picks for the offense, it's time to get back to improving the defense, which has more problems...

[View Full Quote]
Would really like a DE in there. Not satisfied with the dline yet.
fifaguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2012   #44
Ren
Senior Member
 
Ren's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2005
Location:
Oslo, Norway
Posts:
10,019
Send a message via AIM to Ren
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep_Freeze View Post

A later pick of a WR would be good with someone who fell, or we could always sign our old friends Roy Williams or Crayton off the street if we want.....
People joke about it a lot but i honestly would not mind bringing Crayton back as a stopgap #3
Ren is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com