
|
07-28-2012
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 13,340 |
|
ESPN: Ronald Leary loses weight, gets ready for camp
Ronald Leary loses weight, gets ready for camp
By Calvin Watkins
http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowbo...ready-for-camp
...Leary hasn't endured any problems with his left knee, which suffers from a condition known as osteochondritis dissecans -- also referred to as OCD. It's a joint condition in which a piece of cartilage, along with a thin layer of the bone beneath it, comes loose from the end of a bone.
If anything, Leary appears to be moving quite well. Between the offseason workouts and the three-day rookie training camp, Leary said he's lost weight and is currently at 319 pounds. Instead of heading home to Baton Rouge, Leary stayed in Dallas to workout at Valley Ranch.
"I'm nowhere near where I want to be," Leary said. "It's just about a transition in the NFL because it's a different game. I'm trying to get all the techniques from my coach and just talk to the vets and pick up little tips and play my game."
There's no right way to do the wrong thing.
To compete for the playoffs, Dallas has to improve here: Only four sacks against Eli Manning over the past six games!
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#2
|
|
White and Nerdy
Joined: | Apr 2006 |
Location: | San Antonio |
Posts: | 11,311 |
|
He is nowhere near where he wants to be? the NFL defensive linemen better watch out...this guy is on a mission. He went from a fat lard to a streamlined beast in the offseason and has added lots of technique to his game. Now he will have lots of issues this year, but most rookie OL do. Still, he will continue to learn and improve. If he can remain healthy throughout his career, we may have stolen our future starter for the next decade plus.
BTW, I would love for him to be #61.
GO GO
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#3
|
|
Pixel Pusher
Joined: | Aug 2007 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 19,580 |
|
I know a lot of people are high on Leary, but I'd consider his becoming a long term backup a win. I really don't see what's so special about him that some think he can start, and play well, as a rookie.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 11,352 |
|
Welp, cant fault him on his work ethic so far. Big part of being an NFL player is wanting it, which it sounds like he does.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#5
|
|
THE BIG DOG
Years Donated 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Ahhhhh Kansas |
Posts: | 42,799 |
|
It won't surprise me if he ends up starting at some point this season.
This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 3,619 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggems
He is nowhere near where he wants to be? the NFL defensive linemen better watch out...this guy is on a mission. He went from a fat lard to a streamlined beast in the offseason and has added lots of technique to his game. Now he will have lots of issues this year, but most rookie OL do. Still, he will continue to learn and improve. If he can remain healthy throughout his career, we may have stolen our future starter for the next decade plus.
BTW, I would love for him to be #61.
|
I think his degenerative condition precludes any chance of a decade + career, but I'd settle for 6 solid years,,, heck, at this point I'd settle for two solid years from any interior lineman!
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Edmonton, Albert |
Posts: | 12,205 |
|
I have treated some people with OCD and it is a very tricky condition.
I still remain hopeful that in the near future regenerative medicine will help out guys like him but I do think he is playing with borrowed time given the amount of strain he has to put up with on an ongoing basis.
I wouldn't be surpised if he needs regular cleanup of debris from his joint although only itme will tell.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,761 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount
I know a lot of people are high on Leary, but I'd consider his becoming a long term backup a win. I really don't see what's so special about him that some think he can start, and play well, as a rookie.
|
Well, you are always going to see new Cowboys praised. If I mentoned Matt Johnson's name here in March as a possible answer at S I'd have been laughed off the forum. But now he's this super secret gem we unearthed at the expense of the rest of the league. It's just what most fans do.
Having said that, I do think Leary has a chance.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2004 |
Posts: | 13,340 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
Well, you are always going to see new Cowboys praised. If I mentoned Matt Johnson's name here in March as a possible answer at S I'd have been laughed off the forum. But now he's this super secret gem we unearthed at the expense of the rest of the league. It's just what most fans do.
Having said that, I do think Leary has a chance.
|
Risen, sorry for the beefs you endure for stating your own views.
Although I don't always agree with your perspectives, I would would die to ensure your rights to them...and ability to voice them.
There's no right way to do the wrong thing.
To compete for the playoffs, Dallas has to improve here: Only four sacks against Eli Manning over the past six games!
Last edited by DallasEast : 07-30-2012 at 12:59 AM.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#10
|
|
THE BIG DOG
Years Donated 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Ahhhhh Kansas |
Posts: | 42,799 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
Well, you are always going to see new Cowboys praised. If I mentoned Matt Johnson's name here in March as a possible answer at S I'd have been laughed off the forum. But now he's this super secret gem we unearthed at the expense of the rest of the league. It's just what most fans do.
|
That's true with any player not in the mainstream of college football. A few years ago you could have made the same point about a no name QB from Eastern Illinois.
This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,761 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by big dog cowboy
That's true with any player not in the mainstream of college football. A few years ago you could have made the same point about a no name QB from Eastern Illinois.
|
True. But the reason why the Romos and Austins get such attention is because they beat the odds. They weren't supposed to amount to anything. Far more times than not, they wouldn't amount to anything. That's what makes their story so great. Particularly Romo's.
The odds of Matt Johnson becoming a great starting S here are long. Yet he's been treated as if he was a consensus top 100 player in the draft with years of top production against elite competition.
That is only because he's now a Cowboy. If he was drafted by the Giants you wouldn't think much of his pro potential.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,761 |
|
One thing about Leary, he was viewed as a draftable player. Most had him in the mid rounds based strictly off talent. It was the knee that caused him to go undrafted.
Now Matt Johnson was a consensus undrafted grade. Nobody I've read him thought enough of him to even include him as a 7th round possibility.
The Cowboys did the same thing with Lissemore, only at the end of the draft. They've got more invested in Johnson. We shall see how it turns out.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#13
|
|
The Instant Classic
Years Donated 2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Moar leadership! |
Posts: | 20,385 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCBoy
Risen, sorry for the beefs you endure for stating your own views.
Although I don't always agree with your perspectives, I would would die to ensure your rights to them...and ability to voice them.
|
For someone who believes (or pretends to believe) some crazy stuff, Risen Star does a better job than most defending his positions. If you're going to try to make the point that coverage players in today's NFL are overrated, you gotta have pretty thick skin, because you know what's coming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
...Now Matt Johnson was a consensus undrafted grade. Nobody I've read him thought enough of him to even include him as a 7th round possibility...
|
IIRC, draft-day scuttlebut had Baltimore interested in taking Johnson just a few picks after our, and considered him a potential gem. That's admittedly hearsay, though. Still, I think it's safe to say there's a gulf between what NFL teams knew and what was reported in commercial draft prep content.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Last edited by DallasEast : 07-30-2012 at 12:59 AM.
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2009 |
Location: | Idaho |
Posts: | 4,727 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star
One thing about Leary, he was viewed as a draftable player. Most had him in the mid rounds based strictly off talent. It was the knee that caused him to go undrafted.
Now Matt Johnson was a consensus undrafted grade. Nobody I've read him thought enough of him to even include him as a 7th round possibility.
The Cowboys did the same thing with Lissemore, only at the end of the draft. They've got more invested in Johnson. We shall see how it turns out.
|
IIRC Matt Johnson started gaining interest from other teams so we decided to pull the trigger on him early.
We also used our comp pick to get him which was the last pick in the 4th round.
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
|
|
|
07-28-2012
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2009 |
Location: | Idaho |
Posts: | 4,727 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit
IIRC, draft-day scuttlebut had Baltimore interested in taking Johnson just a few picks after our, and considered him a potential gem. That's admittedly hearsay, though. Still, I think it's safe to say there's a gulf between what NFL teams knew and what was reported in commercial draft prep content.
|
I don't know what team it was but juding by the draft order and the comp pick we used on Matt Johnson I don't think it was the Ravens. The hearsay is true though, we did indeed fear some other team picking him before us.
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.
|