Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2012   #16
juck
Senior Member
 
juck's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Location:
Pittsburgh,PA
Posts:
8,975
Default

Andy Reid would succeed with Romo.
juck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #17
Tezz
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
250
Default

A washed up Jeff Garcia succeeded with Andy Reid
Tezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #18
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,808
Default

Everybody would succeed with a solid OL.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #19
juck
Senior Member
 
juck's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Location:
Pittsburgh,PA
Posts:
8,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tezz View Post
A washed up Jeff Garcia succeeded with Andy Reid
Thats the only place he succeeded cause of that system. Romo is a WC QB. Short crossing routes. Romo and Reid would work.
juck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #20
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,357
Default

Quote:
I think it may come down to Romo or Garrett
We all know if somebody has to be fed to the lions it wont be Jerry.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #21
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
US
Posts:
26,084
Default

The WC is a variation of the vertical offense. It's still a timing offense. Many of us here have called for more horizontal routes for a long time esp since we don't have the real burners on the outside.

The problem with the offense is just complicated although I agree the OL is part of the problem as are problems with the WRs.

Perhaps it's possible the problem is we just have enough short comings on offensive talent and makeup that we can't function well. If you think the major problem is Romo though then you are just wrong.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #22
Bluestang
Senior Member
 
Bluestang's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2009
Location:
Idaho
Posts:
4,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobberone View Post
The WC is a variation of the vertical offense. It's still a timing offense. Many of us here have called for more horizontal routes for a long time esp since we don't have the real burners on the outside.

The problem with the offense is just complicated although I agree the OL is part of the problem as are problems with the WRs.

Perhaps it's possible the problem is we just have enough short comings on offensive talent and makeup that we can't function well. If you think the major problem is Romo though then you are just wrong.

Even with the guys we have now, running east/west is still taking a long time to develop.
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
Bluestang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #23
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
US
Posts:
26,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestang View Post
Even with the guys we have now, running east/west is still taking a long time to develop.
I agree. I don't see crossing patterns as being very realistic at least consistently. I haven't looked at the All 22 since our first game but I suspect teams are taking away the inside slants since we run that so well. Austin has made some hay with deep slants or digs (or are they wheels) if you will but that hasn't been real reliable either. And teams are teeing off on the swing passes and bubbles so that leaves Witten underneath for the most part.

The lack of a running game, deep routes and outside speed and the above is killing us. Add poor route running by two of the four receivers and you got problems.

What have those two drives with the hurry up and no huddle consisted of route wise and why were they successful. I'm betting you've looked at the film.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #24
Bluestang
Senior Member
 
Bluestang's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2009
Location:
Idaho
Posts:
4,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobberone View Post
I agree. I don't see crossing patterns as being very realistic at least consistently. I haven't looked at the All 22 since our first game but I suspect teams are taking away the inside slants since we run that so well. Austin has made some hay with deep slants or digs (or are they wheels) if you will but that hasn't been real reliable either. And teams are teeing off on the swing passes and bubbles so that leaves Witten underneath for the most part.
Austin is starting to come around, and is making big plays in the slot like he used to. The bigger problem is with the two guys on the outside who are not speed match-up problems or are inconsistent catchers. Romo is taking what the defense gives him and sometimes that entails throwing the ball to KO or Bryant, neither or which are reliable in crucial situations.

Quote:
The lack of a running game, deep routes and outside speed and the above is killing us.
Not being able to get chunk yardage from a defensive cover 2 is the real killer. It's not the end all for the offense but it sure keeps us heavily unbalanced in drives. Cook's run blocking is really atrocious and has been a big part of the failure of the inside runs. It doesn't help that Bernadeau is inconsistent next to him.

Quote:
What have those two drives with the hurry up and no huddle consisted of route wise and why were they successful. I'm betting you've looked at the film.
The hurry up we run is mainly verticals with some with a crossing route underneath. It's a clear concept. What we really need to do is just stick with the Posse set (S11) and run from it because it does gain good yardage on 1st downs.

Our 3WR set from the shotgun or under center has been really effective this year. It's sort of a spread set in reality because Witten is usually split wide instead of being inline.
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
Bluestang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #25
Bigdog24
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juck View Post
Garrett is running a system that needs a pinpoint accurate laser arm and a serious Oline. His routes are long. Romo is a west coast style QB all the way. IMO I think they dont compliment each other well.
No matter how bad things get, neither will go anywhere. Jerry will be forced to lose crazy (real) money to buy out their contracts. Everyone knows how Jerry loves his money. Its not a salary cap issue, it cold hard franklins that Jerry will be forced to pay for someone to leave.

IE I read Jason Garrett contract is solid 4.5mil for 2013 and 2014 plus 2mil for this year, 11mil total. Garrett is will be the coach for awhile....
Bigdog24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #26
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
US
Posts:
26,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestang View Post
Austin is starting to come around, and is making big plays in the slot like he used to. The bigger problem is with the two guys on the outside who are not speed match-up problems or are inconsistent catchers. Romo is taking what the defense gives him and sometimes that entails throwing the ball to KO or Bryant, neither or which are reliable in crucial situations.



Not being able to get chunk yardage from a defensive cover 2 is the real killer. It's not the end all for the offense but it sure keeps us heavily unbalanced in drives. Cook's run blocking is really atrocious and has been a big part of the failure of the inside runs. It doesn't help that Bernadeau is inconsistent next to him.



The hurry up we run is mainly verticals with some with a crossing route underneath. It's a clear concept. What we really need to do is just stick with the Posse set (S11) and run from it because it does gain good yardage on 1st downs.
[View Full Quote]
Most of that offense is Witten underneath and short intermediates, Austin, and some Dez on crossing routes to the sideline. OT caught the TD on a broken play. Not being able to run is making us esp vunerable in the RZ esp on the goal line. We're just too one dimensional.

We seem to do ok from the 12 but just off of memory we don't seem to be doing that as much as last year but I don't have any stats just my impression.

Why do you think the spread is successful? Some of that offense in hurry up has to be keeping the D off balance and out of some of their special packages I'd think. Imagine there is more to it than that though. What do you think?
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #27
Clove
Shrinkage
 
Clove's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
34,627
Default

Romo still has a fan base. Garrett has none. Do the math.
Clove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #28
Kangaroo
Senior Member
 
Kangaroo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,880
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobberone View Post
Most of that offense is Witten underneath and short intermediates, Austin, and some Dez on crossing routes to the sideline. OT caught the TD on a broken play. Not being able to run is making us esp vunerable in the RZ esp on the goal line. We're just too one dimensional.

We seem to do ok from the 12 but just off of memory we don't seem to be doing that as much as last year but I don't have any stats just my impression.

Why do you think the spread is successful? Some of that offense in hurry up has to be keeping the D off balance and out of some of their special packages I'd think. Imagine there is more to it than that though. What do you think?

Greenbay can not run, oline is as bad or worse then ours but they are better at passing and can get TD in the Redzone still. Then again they execute better than us. I do not by you have to be able run to get TD's

Greenbay as a team has 2 rushing TD's that is it and they have 26.6 points a game

New Orleans who offense has still put up numbers has a total 4 rushing TD's and the team has 27.2 points a game

GB is +4 TO and NO is dead even.

So while a running game can make it easier to score it is not an excuse for Dallas not scoring.


Both those team are in the top 10 scoring teams.
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from his government."
Thomas Paine




Kangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #29
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestang View Post
Austin is starting to come around, and is making big plays in the slot like he used to. The bigger problem is with the two guys on the outside who are not speed match-up problems or are inconsistent catchers. Romo is taking what the defense gives him and sometimes that entails throwing the ball to KO or Bryant, neither or which are reliable in crucial situations.

Not being able to get chunk yardage from a defensive cover 2 is the real killer. It's not the end all for the offense but it sure keeps us heavily unbalanced in drives. Cook's run blocking is really atrocious and has been a big part of the failure of the inside runs. It doesn't help that Bernadeau is inconsistent next to him.

The hurry up we run is mainly verticals with some with a crossing route underneath. It's a clear concept. What we really need to do is just stick with the Posse set (S11) and run from it because it does gain good yardage on 1st downs.

[View Full Quote]
Bluestang, this is just a quality post, all the way around.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012   #30
kirkjrk
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OklahomaCowboy88 View Post
If I were Romo there is no way I'd sign an extension with this team. Hit the market and try to go somewhere where I have a chance to compete in January. I bet he'd be amazed at how a real NFL franchise is run.
I Agree. He will get his money he wants from another team, most probably of his choice. Why would he want to stay and put his health in jeopardy.? Why would he want to play for a coach that has no clue how to lead, discipline, call plays, just not HC material? Why would he want to continue playing for a delusional owner?
kirkjrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com