Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2012   #16
fanfromvirginia
Inconceivable!
 
fanfromvirginia's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Virginia
Posts:
3,707
Default

The D was sub par but not awful in the first half and very good in the second half and OT, giving up only seven points in seven drives (the lone TD being scored when the Browns took over on our 17), forced and recovered a fumble, and had a great goal line stand. They also had some great drive ending hits.
The truth almost always lies somewhere in between...

Except on CZ.
fanfromvirginia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #17
hutch1254
Senior Member
 
hutch1254's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Location:
Buffalo, NY (ye
Posts:
1,220
Default

Cleveland has been in every game this year. They're not garbage anymore. They have some decent pieces and are starting to become competitive.

While the D may not have been top notch what they did do was hold the Browns to 1 for 10 on third down efficiency after letting them go 4 for 5 to start. I thought that was a good comeback.

What bothered me is the 3 man rush...here we got a rookie QB and we're trying to confuse him by dropping 8 instead of getting in his face and rattling him. We pulled that same crap in Seattle and it cost us. It wasn't til later today that we started getting pressure in Weedens face. That and some solid tackling led to that 1 for 10 third down efficiency the rest of the way.
Restore the trenches, restore the rings.
hutch1254 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #18
T-RO
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2009
Posts:
3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddh33 View Post
You tell me that my QB is going to be sacked 7 times, throw the ball 50 times, and only have one turnover, I will take that number of turnovers every time. It could have/should have been so much worse. Romo is a magician back there.
This. Lots of QBs have really clean pockets. Romo's pocket is polluted with bodies within 3 ticks almost every down.

The guy is a miracle and nothing less.
--------------
Jerry Jones' accountabilibuddy
T-RO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #19
CowboyGil
Senior Member
 
CowboyGil's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2012
Posts:
339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoov View Post
this was a time when i would have hoped for 3 runs and a fg given how the defense was shutting down the browns and time was winding down.

also did not like the onsides kick try or whatever that was.
It's called a squib kick to avoid a big return. SOP in the NFL.
CowboyGil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #20
Hoov
Senior Member
 
Hoov's Avatar
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
4,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyGil View Post
It's called a squib kick to avoid a big return. SOP in the NFL.
did not like that call at that point in the game - and dont they usually squib it a lot deeper than that
Hoov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #21
Hoov
Senior Member
 
Hoov's Avatar
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
4,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hutch1254 View Post
Cleveland has been in every game this year. They're not garbage anymore. They have some decent pieces and are starting to become competitive.

While the D may not have been top notch what they did do was hold the Browns to 1 for 10 on third down efficiency after letting them go 4 for 5 to start. I thought that was a good comeback.

What bothered me is the 3 man rush...here we got a rookie QB and we're trying to confuse him by dropping 8 instead of getting in his face and rattling him. We pulled that same crap in Seattle and it cost us. It wasn't til later today that we started getting pressure in Weedens face. That and some solid tackling led to that 1 for 10 third down efficiency the rest of the way.
i was glad to see they did less of the 3 man rush in the second half
Hoov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #22
rynochop
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Over MachoGrande
Posts:
1,830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoov View Post
did not like that call at that point in the game - and dont they usually squib it a lot deeper than that
I'm not sure what that was, other than either a really bad squib or really bad onsides try.
rynochop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #23
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Romo was sacked 7 times, harrassed all game long, had no running game whatsoever and threw 50 passes with no picks.

I doubt that's happened very often in league history.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #24
CowboyRoy
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Posts:
529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboysYanksLakers View Post
The fumble almost killed the team for good... He's got to just take the sack.
I agree he needed to just go down. But what kind of idiot coach has Romo back in shotgun winging the ball all over the field when we just went up by 4 with 5 minutes to go? Honestly. This clown Garrett simply has no clue how to gameplan or coach a game. The ONLY thing that could have screwed us in that situation was a turnover. So run the ball and burn the clock. Punt the ball, make them drive 80 yards for a TD.

Garrett simply has zero feel for a game. In the last 4 weeks this team is down by double digits in the first quarter EVERY time. Thats a complete indictement on his ability to game plan. They are ALL WRONG obviously. His game plans are garbage. The team is also obviously unmotivated and ill prepared to start games. Its only until at some point in the 2nd half when he throws the gameplan out the window and puts the game in Romo's hands with the hurry up offense that this team starts to pick it up. When will this complete idiot realize he might want to start the game with the hurry up?

This clown needs to leave town ASAP. All this win did was prolong his stay in Dallas. Pathetic.
CowboyRoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #25
ConstantReboot
Senior Member
 
ConstantReboot's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
1,197
Send a message via AIM to ConstantReboot
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by links18 View Post
He managed the game well today. He was a little high on a few passes early, but he settled down in the second half.

The fumble was not good. We were in FG range. Still, that is who Romo is. It is his instinct to try to keep the play alive. Garrett needs to recognize that and not put him in a position to fail, which is exactly what he did on the fumble play. It was first and twenty in FG range, yet we are looking for the long ball. Call a roll out pass to Witten for 9 yards and go from there on 2nd and 11. Nope, its a long developing play that the OLine simply cannot block for and it leads to--surprise-- a turnover. Terrible game management there from the head coach/ offensive coordinator.
This is what makes me upset about Garrett's playcalling. He calls plays that seem to question his abilities. He had no reason to call for those long developing timing passes down field. He could have ran the ball or throw a quick slant to try to make up for yardages. Garrett should be blamed for that fumble just as much as Romo.
ConstantReboot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #26
CowboyRoy
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Posts:
529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoov View Post
did not like that call at that point in the game - and dont they usually squib it a lot deeper than that
Another idiot call by dunce boy that was woefully executed by an ill prepared team.
CowboyRoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #27
CowboyRoy
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Posts:
529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConstantReboot View Post
This is what makes me upset about Garrett's playcalling. He calls plays that seem to question his abilities. He had no reason to call for those long developing timing passes down field. He could have ran the ball or throw a quick slant to try to make up for yardages. Garrett should be blamed for that fumble just as much as Romo.
Amen. Just like the fool has Romo back in shotgun up 23 points in the 3rd quarter against Detriot last year. Total stupidity.
CowboyRoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #28
AdamJT13
Salary Cap Analyst
 
AdamJT13's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
14,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
Romo was sacked 7 times, harrassed all game long, had no running game whatsoever and threw 50 passes with no picks.

I doubt that's happened very often in league history.
It had happened exactly once before today -- and the first time was actually just last month. Kevin Kolb threw 50 passes without an interception, was sacked nine times and had no running game (17 for 45) in the Cardinals' 17-3 loss to the Rams.
AdamJT13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #29
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
Romo was sacked 7 times, harrassed all game long, had no running game whatsoever and threw 50 passes (and completed 70% of them for > 300 yards) with no picks.

I doubt that's happened very often in league history.
add on


Though, if I had to guess, I suspect Aaron Rodgers pulled off the feat last year sometime.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #30
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13 View Post
It had happened exactly once before today -- and the first time was actually just last month. Kevin Kolb threw 50 passes without an interception, was sacked nine times and had no running game (17 for 45) in the Cardinals' 17-3 loss to the Rams.
Well, I don't know what to think about that now.

Kevin Kolb? Not exactly elite company. Still, I thought Romo was terrific today, all things considered.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com