
|
01-12-2013
|
#16
|
|
1st Round Pick
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 25,176 |
|
People are just desperate for a good coach.
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Nederland, Texas |
Posts: | 1,432 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17
People are just desperate for a good coach.
|
Amen!!!!!!
"Maybe next year!!" We have been saying this phrase WAYYYYY too long!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#18
|
|
Star Power
Joined: | Nov 2004 |
Location: | Potomac, MD |
Posts: | 7,680 |
|
I'm not a supporter of Garrett's offensive play calling by any means. I've criticized him enough. But it's silly to think that he doesn't get three full years (with training camps) and right now, it looks like things might just get better, starting with the Kiffen hiring. Stiffen up the offensive line in the draft or FA, reduced his responsibilities and get someone to help as OC, hope for less injuries on either side of the ball, and I think we have a shot next year.
Is there any reward for good other than good?
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#19
|
|
1st Round Pick
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 25,176 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SultanOfSix
I'm not a supporter of Garrett's offensive play calling by any means. I've criticized him enough. But it's silly to think that he doesn't get three years and right now, it looks like things might just get better, starting with the Kiffen hiring. Stiffen up the offensive line in the draft or FA, reduced his responsibilities and get someone to help as OC, hope for less injuries on either side of the ball, and I think we have a shot next year.
|
You have to factor in his time as an OC as well.
If you've worked with the guy first hand for 6 years then you know what you have at this point.
Just call a spade a spade and move on.
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2010 |
Location: | Los Angeles, CA |
Posts: | 2,536 |
|
I am at the point where I think nothing much is going to change offensively. Garrett is doing a good job of deflecting his lack of an offensive game.
Maybe it is time to go all-in on the defense thru the draft and FA. Lets at least have one dominant side. If SF, Sea, etc can get there with those QB's, then so can we IMO.
Everyone has a plan, until they get hit.
/ Mike Tyson
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Tampa |
Posts: | 3,837 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood
I don't understand the fascination with Gruden. He doesn't warrant the attention he is receiving on this board. There are several others who should be higher on a list than Gruden.
|
Maybe.
I do know that Gruden (if hired here) would have the most talent on offense that he's ever had as HC. Look at the QB's Gruden has worked with:
Rich Gannon, Brad Johnson, Chris Simms, Bruce Gradkowski, Jeff Garcia, Tim Rattay, Rob Johnson, etc.
WRs:
Jerry Rice, Jerry Porter, Keyshawn, Joe Jurevicious, Keenan McCardell, David Boston, Michael Clayton, Joey Galloway, Ike Hilliard, etc.
RBs:
Charlie Garner, Cadillac Williams, Michael Pittman, Mike Alstott, Ernest Graham, etc.
Now, after looking over those names (and I'm sure I left some out), I don't believe he's exactly had stellar talent over the years. I'm also not overlooking the fact that Gruden has had some pretty awful drafts. Of course, he's to blame for a good portion of that. Just trying to be subjective.
Basically, I'm saying that looking at Gruden's portfolio of work over the last 5 seasons of his time with the Bucs would not tell the true story. I truly think this would be the best situation for Gruden.
I agree though, that Garrett isn't going anywhere. The move would've been made already.
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#22
|
|
Star Power
Joined: | Nov 2004 |
Location: | Potomac, MD |
Posts: | 7,680 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17
You have to factor in his time as an OC as well.
If you've worked with the guy first hand for 6 years then you know what you have at this point.
Just call a spade a spade and move on.
|
Well, it's hard to say. Three years under Wade with the team getting progressively less disciplined, with at least one playoff victory and the #1 seed in the playoffs. Just like Landry's three year rule with players, I think he gets at least three years as a head coach. I think our talent acquisition is steadily improving and the organization seems to be turning it around. Since I have no power over it, I can only hope based on what I see.
Is there any reward for good other than good?
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#23
|
|
I'm kind of a Big Deal
Joined: | Dec 2007 |
Location: | Under The Bus |
Posts: | 6,020 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noshame
Great, we'll keep a HC who's authority has been gutted. 
|
other than broad knee jerking, opinion, and media speculation do you have any proof that Garrett is not making these decisions along with the GM?....
the day Kiffin showed up at VR he arrived with Garrett not JJ.....Kiffin talks of his meeting with JG....JG is the one who has the connection with Kiffin from the Buc days....
IMO it was Garrett that wanted the DC change, i think he was tired of having that undisciplined slob running down his sideline cussing at opposing players, and drawing penalties....
this may be hard to comprehend but Garrett really does have the power to choose his own staff and players
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2007 |
Posts: | 126 |
|
...So Hiring the DC that helped Gruden win a superbowl is the reason he is obviously not coming to Dallas...allllriightythen
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#25
|
|
1st Round Pick
Years Donated 2010, 2011, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 25,176 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SultanOfSix
Well, it's hard to say. Three years under Wade with the team getting progressively less disciplined, with at least one playoff victory and the #1 seed in the playoffs. Just like Landry's three year rule with players, I think he gets at least three years as a head coach. I think our talent acquisition is steadily improving and the organization seems to be turning it around. Since I have no power over it, I can only hope based on what I see.
|
The team looks no different other than they try harder in Garrett. Wade got better results though.
Sometimes I wonder if Wade would've had more post season success here if he could've picked his offensive coordinator.
|
|
|
01-12-2013
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexternjack
I am at the point where I think nothing much is going to change offensively. Garrett is doing a good job of deflecting his lack of an offensive game.
Maybe it is time to go all-in on the defense thru the draft and FA. Lets at least have one dominant side. If SF, Sea, etc can get there with those QB's, then so can we IMO.
|
We don't have to be that desperate (regardless of some on this Board).
Cut guys including Free, Coleman, Spears and restructure Carr and Romo. That will provide some of the cap room.
Pick up 1 quality OL and 1 quality DL in FA. Go and draft another DL, OL and a Safety. Pick up another RB and WR in the later rounds.
Pray that we stay healthier than last season.
No reason we can't be better than last season.
|
|
|
01-13-2013
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Posts: | 491 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexternjack
I am at the point where I think nothing much is going to change offensively. Garrett is doing a good job of deflecting his lack of an offensive game.
Maybe it is time to go all-in on the defense thru the draft and FA. Lets at least have one dominant side. If SF, Sea, etc can get there with those QB's, then so can we IMO.
|
But we don't have one of those QBs.
We have an "OHNO" QB that has been a lifelong loser regardless of his coach or talent level he was surrounded with. Pretty stats, but will lose at the first opportunity in the playoffs virtually every time, if he doesn't before he gets there.
|
|
|
01-13-2013
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Posts: | 491 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadymat
other than broad knee jerking, opinion, and media speculation do you have any proof that Garrett is not making these decisions along with the GM?....
the day Kiffin showed up at VR he arrived with Garrett not JJ.....Kiffin talks of his meeting with JG....JG is the one who has the connection with Kiffin from the Buc days....
IMO it was Garrett that wanted the DC change, i think he was tired of having that undisciplined slob running down his sideline cussing at opposing players, and drawing penalties....
this may be hard to comprehend but Garrett really does have the power to choose his own staff and players
|
This 
|
|
|
01-13-2013
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 2,220 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadymat
other than broad knee jerking, opinion, and media speculation do you have any proof that Garrett is not making these decisions along with the GM?....
the day Kiffin showed up at VR he arrived with Garrett not JJ.....Kiffin talks of his meeting with JG....JG is the one who has the connection with Kiffin from the Buc days....
IMO it was Garrett that wanted the DC change, i think he was tired of having that undisciplined slob running down his sideline cussing at opposing players, and drawing penalties....
this may be hard to comprehend but Garrett really does have the power to choose his own staff and players
|
Why? Because Jerry says so? I suppose JG is forcing himself to hire a OC?
Honestly, the fact that some of you STILL think coaches’ call the shots here is unbelievable. 
By the end of 2014 Romo will not be starting for the cowboys and the most popular phrase on the board will be..."see I knew we shouldn't have signed him to that big contract".
|
|
|
01-13-2013
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jun 2004 |
Posts: | 491 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noshame
Why? Because Jerry says so? I suppose JG is forcing himself to hire a OC?
Honestly, the fact that some of you STILL think coaches’ call the shots here is unbelievable. 
|
Has there been a playcaller hired by Jerry that I haven't heard about? He already has an OC.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.
|