Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-17-2013   #16
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,281
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by visionary View Post
yes, we can fill most of our holes this offseason if we are smart becasue htis draft is deep at DL, OL, and safety

our major needs are 2 DL, 2-3 OL, 1 safety
there are other needs like backup RB and slot receiver that are further down the list

what we should do is:

FA:
1 DL
1 OL

Draft:

if possible, trade down into mid 20s and get extra 3dr round pick

Rd 1: OL or DL (based on value and our draft board)
Rd 2: OL or DL (whichever was not obtained in Rd 1)
Rd 3: FS (this is a deep safety class at safety and there will be someone available here who can potentially compete for a starting spot and cettainly develop into a starter)
Rd 3: OL
Rd 4: slot receiver or back up RB
Rd 5: slot receive or back up RB

and so on

we can make it work if we are smart
I could see things working out that way.
MichaelWinicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013   #17
Eddie
Senior Member
 
Eddie's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
7,974
Default

No trading down. We need to stay put and get the best player available for that slot. No more games. Don't try to get cute.
Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013   #18
rwalters31
Senior Member
 
rwalters31's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie View Post
No trading down. We need to stay put and get the best player available for that slot. No more games. Don't try to get cute.
No more pretty boys! We need BIG Uglies!!
rwalters31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013   #19
Eddie
Senior Member
 
Eddie's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
7,974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwalters31 View Post
No more pretty boys! We need BIG Uglies!!
Sounds good to me. I'll take a big ugly any day.

The bigger and uglier the better.
Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013   #20
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,281
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

But truthfully if the Cowboys came up empty on every round when it came to offensive lineman BECAUSE there was a CLEARLY better rated talent available at the spot they were drafting, then I'm on board with not taking any offensive linemen. I think you have to take what the draft gives you. If you force-feed positions then you get drafts like this:

2 49 Dwayne Goodrich CB Tennessee
4 109 Kareem Larrimore CB West Texas A&M
5 144 Michael Wiley HB Ohio St.
6 180 Mario Edwards CB Florida St.
7 219 Orantes Grant OLB Georgia
MichaelWinicki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013   #21
Kangaroo
Senior Member
 
Kangaroo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki View Post
But truthfully if the Cowboys came up empty on every round when it came to offensive lineman BECAUSE there was a CLEARLY better rated talent available at the spot they were drafting, then I'm on board with not taking any offensive linemen. I think you have to take what the draft gives you. If you force-feed positions then you get drafts like this:

2 49 Dwayne Goodrich CB Tennessee
4 109 Kareem Larrimore CB West Texas A&M
5 144 Michael Wiley HB Ohio St.
6 180 Mario Edwards CB Florida St.
7 219 Orantes Grant OLB Georgia
Sad part is Edwards was the best of that group he was not great but played solid for us he was great value for being a 6th rounder.

Larrimore and Goodrich where terrible draft picks both had questionable character which of course showed up. The issue really is we drafted two questionable characters which was way to big of a gamble. Equals fail
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from his government."
Thomas Paine




Kangaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013   #22
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,281
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kangaroo View Post
Sad part is Edwards was the best of that group he was not great but played solid for us he was great value for being a 6th rounder.

Larrimore and Goodrich where terrible draft picks both had questionable character which of course showed up. The issue really is we drafted two questionable characters which was way to big of a gamble. Equals fail
I'll tell ya, looking at the drafts from that time period the Cowboys paid zero attention to character when drafting guys. I mean year after year until about the time Parcells came on board, the Cowboys were blowing a couple picks per draft on knuckle-heads.

Thankfully they've done much better in that area.
MichaelWinicki is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com