Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2013   #31
DBOY3141
Senior Member
 
DBOY3141's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
2,526
Default

Fix the OL and we still be that good.

It all starts up front.
DBOY3141 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #32
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOY3141 View Post
Fix the OL and we still be that good.

It all starts up front.
Fix the OL, the D will stink.

Fix the D, the OL will stink.

Pick your poison, either way we have too many holes to fill and probably still looking at 8-8.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #33
Zimmy Lives
Senior Member
 
Zimmy Lives's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Location:
Frisco, TX
Posts:
3,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOY3141 View Post
Fix the OL and we still be that good.

It all starts up front.
Fix the o-line and find another weapon -- either by design (scheme) or adding another player who can make plays -- who can consistently be a threat. This offense has had only one reliable weapon over the past few years and that is Witten. Murray, Austin and Dez are all great weapons but they have not all been at the top of their game at the same time.

Tony also needs to be more responsible with the football.
Garrett to players: Make today a great day; go about the business of winning! If you can't keep up then don't step up.
Zimmy Lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #34
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt View Post
The offensive line has degraded year by year by year since Garrett got here.
That is part of it.

The other part is that, around week 13 or 14 of 2007, defenses figured out what JG is trying to do, and he has not adapted.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #35
TheFinisher
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2010
Posts:
1,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Future View Post
That is part of it.

The other part is that, around week 13 or 14 of 2007, defenses figured out what JG is trying to do, and he has not adapted.
And the third part, that no one seems to like recognizing, is T.O. left. The guy was arguably THE most dominant wideout of his generation and was the key cog in that 2007 offense.
TheFinisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #36
DBOY3141
Senior Member
 
DBOY3141's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
2,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimmy Lives View Post
Fix the o-line and find another weapon -- either by design (scheme) or adding another player who can make plays -- who can consistently be a threat. This offense has had only one reliable weapon over the past few years and that is Witten. Murray, Austin and Dez are all great weapons but they have not all been at the top of their game at the same time.

Tony also needs to be more responsible with the football.
I agree. I think the light has finally gone on for Dez. They always say it's the 3rd year for WR's. We can hope he continues. I have hope for Harris and Hannah as new weapons. Witten has slowed down, but is still a weapon. Murray needs to stay healthy. If all those "if's" work out, then the weapons are fine. Not as much faith in the OL as it stands today.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for 2013.
DBOY3141 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #37
Zimmy Lives
Senior Member
 
Zimmy Lives's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Location:
Frisco, TX
Posts:
3,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOY3141 View Post
I agree. I think the light has finally gone on for Dez. They always say it's the 3rd year for WR's. We can hope he continues. I have hope for Harris and Hannah as new weapons. Witten has slowed down, but is still a weapon. Murray needs to stay healthy. If all those "if's" work out, then the weapons are fine. Not as much faith in the OL as it stands today.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for 2013.
Same here!

Garrett needs to create opportunities for his weapons to make plays. They also need to add a weapon at the slot position. The key, unfortunately, is solidifying the o-line. I am definitely keeping my fingers crossed that this is a priority.
Garrett to players: Make today a great day; go about the business of winning! If you can't keep up then don't step up.
Zimmy Lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #38
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
US
Posts:
26,087
Default

Great question. Multifactoral answer.

Except for a period of 13 games in 2007 the offense has been average roughly speaking.

That's looking at the stats in general. My eyeball tells me the offense is at times unstoppable and at times inconceivably bad. Which means the problem is not just the personnel sucks completely nor does the play calling.

This team just doesn't play well, in general, for four quarters. If they can figure that out and plug some holes then we have the skill players to go all the way.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #39
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt View Post
The offensive line has degraded year by year by year since Garrett got here.
True but then even the OL players drafted by Parcells were bust. In my view it is not the lack of drafting OL players it is the failure of finding OL players who could play at this level.
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
Doomsday101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #40
CowboysYanksLakers
Senior Member
 
CowboysYanksLakers's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
The Mid Altantic
Posts:
2,126
Opinion Gee would you look a here....

This team had a better offensive line... Tony a lot of the time could sit in the pocket for days and let the play develop down the field.

CowboysYanksLakers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #41
percyhoward
Research Tool
 
percyhoward's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
under this tree
Posts:
6,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Idgit View Post
Couldn't run the ball, but you don't win by running the ball. We threw it well. We just had a lot of drives cut short by turnovers and didn't get enough takeaways to help offset the effect that had on our scoring. But in terms of highlight reel stuff, we had a ton of great plays this season.

I know, I know, JG sucks and can't call plays. I forgot for a minute there.
We need more red zone opportunities (you mentioned takeaways), but we also need to do a much, much better job at scoring touchdowns in the red zone once we do get there.

That's on the offense, and it is a big problem.
percyhoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #42
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-RO View Post
-The Gurode cut was financial Jerry/money*
Not sure if serious...

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #43
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep_Freeze View Post
Fix the OL, the D will stink.

Fix the D, the OL will stink.

Pick your poison, either way we have too many holes to fill and probably still looking at 8-8.
I would always go OLine over anything else.

It helps everybody:

Better for the QB.
Better for the RBs.
Better for the WRs.
Better for the Defense (time of possession).
Better for the team (set the tone by running over people).

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #44
juck
Senior Member
 
juck's Avatar
Years Donated
2012
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Location:
Pittsburgh,PA
Posts:
8,975
Default

Romo and TO and Crayton really knew each other well.
juck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013   #45
links18
Senior Member
 
links18's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2004
Posts:
6,878
Default

What's different in those highlights compared to now? How about TO burning defenses, Crayton making tough catch after tough catch and Marion Barber in beast mode out of the backfield?
links18 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com