Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2013   #16
Derinyar
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,718
Default

I think you can draft any position high. It just depends on the player. One person was arguing that you shouldn't draft a WR in the first round. I'd counter with Calvin Johnson, AJ Green, Dez, Julio Jones, Fitgerald and I'm sure I'm missing more that are good. Its about the player and their talent/drive not the position of the player, with the exception of kicker. I'd probably lean toward saying that TE probably shouldn't be a 1st round pick, the guys picked in round 1 seem to fail more then a lot of the other 1st rounders.
Derinyar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #17
CaptainMorgan
Senior Member
 
CaptainMorgan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2006
Location:
Nashville, TN
Posts:
1,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostar2009 View Post
there are 2 te's with first round grades
I wouldnt spend a 1st on a TE regardless of their grades though.



Richard Winters
January 21, 1918 - January 2nd 2011

CaptainMorgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #18
SWG9
Senior Member
 
SWG9's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2011
Posts:
727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyBoy718 View Post
Call me crazy but (unless a guy is a phenomenal talent) I wouldn't draft RB, WR, TE, OG, OC, S, CB, NT in the first round. Late first round is different. But an early or mid first rounder, I would only draft QB, LT, pass rushing DL or LB, or a play making LB in the 1st. Interior OL, skill position offensive players, secondary, and gap filling NTs can be had in later rounds.
The problem is everyone else in the league wants to do exactly the same thing because those are the premium positions. There are only a handful of guys that come out each year at the those positions that are worthy of a 1st round pick, and they all go quite high.

Obviously things change from year to year depending on the overall talent pool in the draft, but once you get out of the top 12-15 picks or so, IMO, the only goal should be to draft a player that's starter quality, regardless of position.

Anything beyond that is gravy.
SWG9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #19
TwoDeep3
Senior Member
 
TwoDeep3's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,859
Default

Draft rounds really speak about compensation. When fans speak about wasting a first round pick, these are some of the same fans that are ready to trade out of the first round for extra picks because an extra second and fourth is twice as good as a first.

But in truth two lesser players do not always, or even mostly equate to one great player, as long as your team is taking a great player.

Montana was a third round pick. But if you put Montana on the Raider's team and expected him to win four championships with their go deep mentality, you'd find he was not all that. Smart player that was fairly accurate. But not the type of player that would challenge a team deep consistently.

So the notion of draft slotting is more about what the team gives up in compensation. And to a degree that also has to do with the position they play.

Position of need is a code word for some. But teams do draft for need in the realm of targeting players. For instance they may need a guard, tackle, safety or defensive lineman. They may draft in those areas, which is drafting for need, but they also triage those needs and will draft out of their primary need to get a better player than what is available at their primary need.

My personal belief is trading down does not always mean making the right decision. it depends on who is doing the picking.

One might suggest if it is Bill Belichek, then trading down is a pretty solid deal.

There are other GMs that trading down is just getting an extra helping of turd.
You've been weighed

You've been measured

And you've been found to be a casual fan
TwoDeep3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #20
CowboysYanksLakers
Senior Member
 
CowboysYanksLakers's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
The Mid Altantic
Posts:
2,129
Default

The overall talent in this year's draft sucks....

CowboysYanksLakers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #21
lostar2009
Senior Member
 
lostar2009's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
234
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboysYanksLakers View Post
The overall talent in this year's draft sucks....
There is no elite talent but it has a lot of what dallas need s,ol,dl.. real deep
Collin Klein in 2013 plz !!!!
lostar2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #22
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,298
Default

kicker, punter, fullback never in round 1.

te, rb, og, oc almost never.

all of those positions would have grading penalties for me.

kicker, punter, fullback would top out at about 80-85 points.

te, rb, og, oc would top out at about 90 points.
that's no higher than mid first round.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #23
GloryDaysRBack
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboysYanksLakers View Post
The overall talent in this year's draft sucks....
you clearly know nothing about this years draft

this draft is super deep
GloryDaysRBack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #24
AMERICAS_FAN
Senior Member
 
AMERICAS_FAN's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,172
Default

Deep Snapper!
___Americas Fan___
=================
_ AMERICAS_TEAM _
=================

Trent Dilfer: "Tony [Romo] has greatness in him. I think when you talk to other people that really play the quarterback position, there's a few guys that really have incredible greatness in them, and Tony is one of them. I think the issue here is he needs more help from his teammates. I think they are not nearly as talented as people say they are, from 1 to 53. I'm talking about the total roster.”
AMERICAS_FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #25
jchap
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2008
Posts:
665
Default

Only players worth taking in the first round are WRs and CBs since they run the fastest 40s
jchap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #26
FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
 
FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Nowhereland
Posts:
13,852
Default

To me it's all about the bust rate. TE and OG normally have a better success rate than other positions. I would have no issue drafting one or the other is the grade was right.

Other positions are overdrafted. QB, WR and DL are especially worrisome in that regard. If you are drafting at the top of the draft then that is one thing. OTOH, if you are in the middle rounds and the pickings are thinned out then I would be reluctant to draft those positions.

WR especially. Dez may very well work out in a big way but I absolutely hated that trade.
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins

Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
FuzzyLumpkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013   #27
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins View Post
To me it's all about the bust rate. TE and OG normally have a better success rate than other positions. I would have no issue drafting one or the other is the grade was right.

Other positions are overdrafted. QB, WR and DL are especially worrisome in that regard. If you are drafting at the top of the draft then that is one thing. OTOH, if you are in the middle rounds and the pickings are thinned out then I would be reluctant to draft those positions.

WR especially. Dez may very well work out in a big way but I absolutely hated that trade.
Bust rate is high on other positions as well. At least as far as meeting blue chip status. We are talking about the team that draft David LeFluer.

At OG:
In the Pro Bowl Mankins was chosen 31st overall, th eother two AFC OGs were 3rd round picks.
In the NFC is was 1 1st rounder, 1 4th and 1 2nd.

So all these other 1st round OGs didn't make it.

If I am drafting an OG in round 1 he better be a regular in Pro Bowls.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013   #28
ThreeandOut
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
San Antonio
Posts:
1,496
Default

There are certain positions that I wouldn't be inclined to select with a 1st round pick (RB, TE, OG, LB) because the positions tend to fall on draft day and you can usually get good value in later rounds.

But I might use a 1st round pick on one of these positions if I were selecting late in the round, if I had a 1st round grade on the player, and all my other players with 1st round grades were off the board.
ThreeandOut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013   #29
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,724
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMorgan View Post
TE, FB, punter kicker
TE? Have you seen Vernon Davis ever play? He burns CBs for TDs.

MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013   #30
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,724
Default

Just to note DTs and WR fare pretty bad in the 1st round. Just noting that.
MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com