Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2013   #16
Bowdown27
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2011
Posts:
2,092
Default

I honestly can see us trading a first next year to jump back into the first round this year. Get a safety or guard or maybe Eddie lacy. Seems this draft is a big one for us

Austin 3:16
Says The Cowboys Will Whip Your ***
Bowdown27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #17
44cowboys22
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
NE Oklahoma
Posts:
126
Default

So lets get this straight...We are hoping to stockpile picks in this years? Isn't this our same group of draft guru's that hit home runs 2006-2009? Now, pessimism aside...... Least they're staying out of free agency for now or over paying for one of our own
44cowboys22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #18
gimmesix
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son
 
gimmesix's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowdown27 View Post
@SullyBaldHead: Cowboys really like the depth in this draft, don't be surprised if they trade future picks (2014-15) for more selections this April.
I think this would be my plan, too. Jerry Jones knows the window is closing on some of his top players and said so last year, so he needs to make a push with them now.

In order to do that, he'd have to a) make a lot of room and be aggressive in free agency, which only adds more big contracts and older players or b) take advantage of a deep draft by trading for more picks in the early rounds, which would give Dallas an influx of young players with small contracts for the next few years.

Dallas cannot, however, afford to trade back to pick up more picks. If it's going to take the now approach, it needs as many "blue-chippers" as it can get.
"'Room' always makes me chuckle. That's irrelevant. What we have on a given day really doesn't relate to what you're ultimately going to have and how you're going to manage."
Stephen Jones on salary cap limitations
gimmesix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #19
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myslamsareolder View Post
id rather trade FOR 2014 picks... trade our 2 and 6 for a '14 #1... that way we can go all in on clowney haha. My ideal would be to Trade Spencer for a 2014 #1 and trade orton for a 2014 #3 sign a crappy backup qb and start Hatcher at DE (since he only has one year left), Ratliff at 1tech and Crawford at 3tech. Package the two #1s, our #2 and one of the #3s in '14 for Clowney. then youd have a line of Ware-Ratliff-Crawford-Clowney... maybe Brian Price (who i am REALLY high on) instead of Ratliff in '14 with Rat being rotational. that would be a sick line.
I would like to see some extra picks next year too. The only way that I want extra picks this year is if they get some picks by trading Spencer or some of the other overpayed veterans. For the right price , Romo could go as well, even Ware. I am ready for full rebuilding mode. Next year they could target the top QB and Clowney. Now that would be a good draft to get both.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #20
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,596
Default

Figures. Jerry has to have his moment in the sun, especially with no top free agent.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #21
speedkilz88
Senior Member
 
speedkilz88's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,306
Default

If true I think there is a better chance they trade down to five + spots looking for a 2nd round pick.
****






"The restructures are built in. Everybody’s making a big to do about this. I don’t know why."- Stephen Jones
speedkilz88 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #22
Zordon
Senior Member
 
Zordon's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
Austin via Big D
Posts:
4,426
Default

we act like 2014's draft is chopped liver.

Zordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #23
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,362
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slomoxn View Post
Here comes the beanstalk...
Seriously though, this team should looking hard at Bridgewater and JFB next year, doing what it takes to get one of em. It would be the right move IMO.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #24
Gemini Dolly
Senior Member
 
Gemini Dolly's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2007
Location:
TeXas
Posts:
5,317
Default

Heres another one from Baldy.

Jeff Sullivan ‏@SullyBaldHead It's pretty obvious that the Cowboys are going to allow Tony Romo to play out his contract in 2013. Don't expect an extension.


Gemini Dolly's twitter

QB Tony Romo has played 4 "Win or Go Home" games since 2008 (includes 2 playoff gms) -- in 3 of them, his QBR was less than 20"
---ESPNStatsINFO
Gemini Dolly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #25
myslamsareolder
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Sep 2008
Posts:
166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnday View Post
I would like to see some extra picks next year too. The only way that I want extra picks this year is if they get some picks by trading Spencer or some of the other overpayed veterans. For the right price , Romo could go as well, even Ware. I am ready for full rebuilding mode. Next year they could target the top QB and Clowney. Now that would be a good draft to get both.
eh im not ready to give up Ware or Romo really. Ware is still the best pass rusher in the league when healthy (unless Watt continues the way he is going and from the 34 end spot no less jjjeeesh ) also i am just not down with manziel. hes a diva and will be a bad egg imo... bust is written all over him, but we shouldnt be trying to get more picks this year. I WANT CLOWNEY ahaha
myslamsareolder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #26
supercowboy8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
4,273
Default

I think this is more or less telling teams that they are interested in trading back in the 1st and adding picks if their guy is gone than it is trading future picks.

If the top guys are gone and you like the depth then why not trade back when you have similar grades.

18 and 47 for cincy 21 and 37
Then trade 21 to Miami for their two seconds and another pick
supercowboy8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #27
Bluestang
Senior Member
 
Bluestang's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2009
Location:
Idaho
Posts:
4,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gemini Dolly View Post
Heres another one from Baldy.

Jeff Sullivan ‏@SullyBaldHead It's pretty obvious that the Cowboys are going to allow Tony Romo to play out his contract in 2013. Don't expect an extension.

I'm curious on what is driving this?

Josh Ellis?
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
Bluestang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #28
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluestang View Post
There is very good depth in the 2nd and 3rd rounds.

I agree, but all the more reason to trade down IMO. I think it's foolish to trade away future picks.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #29
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gemini Dolly View Post
Heres another one from Baldy.

Jeff Sullivan ‏@SullyBaldHead It's pretty obvious that the Cowboys are going to allow Tony Romo to play out his contract in 2013. Don't expect an extension.
This deserves it's own thread. I see a quality discussion around this topic. Romo on the way out? Oh yeah, it would be a twenty page thread.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013   #30
Bluestang
Senior Member
 
Bluestang's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2009
Location:
Idaho
Posts:
4,730
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnday View Post
This deserves it's own thread. I see a quality discussion around this topic. Romo on the way out? Oh yeah, it would be a twenty page thread.

Who knows how well founded this is.

Sullivan's partner is Josh Ellis, who has completely done a 180 on Romo.
"It's little bit like the description of pornography from years back. It's hard to define it. But you know what it is at the end of it. It's hard to define it. I think you know who is more physical. Often times you see that in the fourth quarter. A lot of time the team on the other side feels it. We pride ourselves on being a physical football team. It's important to us. It's an important time of the year to lay that foundation." - Coach Garrett
Bluestang is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com