how is this for chemistry - Page 2 - Dallas Cowboys Forum

followthestar · 07-03-2005

thanks for a really interesting thread, and i do believe Parcells places a lot of value on these type connections. obviously he wouldn't bring in players who have not gotten along previously, as trust and chemistry are huge in his philosophy.
i especially like that A-Train and Henson played together before. if it should come to pass that Bledsoe can't finish a game/season, at least we can guess that Henson still knows how to hand the ball off to Thomas...

**MichaelWinicki** · 07-03-2005

Yeah! Great stuff!

STSINAZ · 07-03-2005

thanks...what did everyone think of what i heard about our players....lol

Hostile · 07-03-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by STSINAZ

thanks...what did everyone think of what i heard about our players....lol

I think it took away from what was a great topic. Your choice though.

THEHEREAFTER · 07-03-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by STSINAZ

how is this for chemistry

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keyshawn played with Barnes, Claybrooks, and Singleton at the Bucs

Keyshawn played with Ferguson, Eric O and Aaron Glenn at the Jets, Bowles was there too.....so was Todd Haley ...Bill also as we know

Terry Glenn played with Rivera at Green Bay

Henry, Quincy Morgan and Bowles were together in Cleveland

Bledsoe played with Terry Glenn in New England...bill was there too as we know

Bledsoe and Izell Reese played together in Buffalo

Peterman and Spears played together at LSU...i think Bradie was there too at the same time
but not sure

Quincy Morgan and Newman played together at Kansas

Merritt and the A Train played together in Chicago...Todd Haley was there too

[View Full Quote]

This is the reason I love this site! Great post!

goshan · 07-03-2005

I really don't think the 'connections' on the Cowboys are more than the average NFL team.

And even if they are a little more than normal in terms of historically 'playing together', I don't think it translates one bit to team chemistry.

That being said, I admire your effort and research on making this post. But again, I would guess if you researched many other teams, you would find a similar amount of 'connections'.

STSINAZ · 07-03-2005

is there anyone out there that would like to research other teams? I would love to know the connections per team...I bet there are only 5 of 6 that have as many as us....the other thing was obviously a joke...lol...

Hostile · 07-03-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by STSINAZ

is there anyone out there that would like to research other teams? I would love to know the connections per team...I bet there are only 5 of 6 that have as many as us....the other thing was obviously a joke...lol...

Yes, that was obvious. It still killed what was a really good thread topic.

STSINAZ · 07-03-2005

big deal, it was funny, it didnt kill the thread or take away from the initial post IMO...you guys need to lighten up a bit. This is a message board. It's not your job. You dont get paid for it. If you really read the joke you would see the wisdom in it.

Hostile · 07-03-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by STSINAZ

big deal, it was funny, it didnt kill the thread or take away from the initial post IMO...you guys need to lighten up a bit. This is a message board. It's not your job. You dont get paid for it. If you really read the joke you would see the wisdom in it.

Hello Cleopatra.