Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 07-13-2004   #31
aikemirv
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Virginia
Posts:
7,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I wish we'd get some news on it.

Let's say for arguments sake we release Hutch, and place Romo on the Practice Squad where we lose him to a team that is injured at QB.

Vinny is a 1 year band aid. That means we go from 5 QBs in 2004 to 2 in 2005.

It could happen.
Very good point, You almost have to keep the 4th QB on the active roster if you want to be assured he's there next year.
aikemirv is offline  
Old 07-13-2004   #32
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockix
I understand your fear, but we have to rely on Carter and Henson for now.
I'm not really comfortable with Vinny in Dallas, I just don't get it.
And who knows about Romo?

An improved offense will just make Carter better or at least look better and we will see if Henson develop as the real deal or not.

If we get to 2 QB then we'll get one in FA or late rd draft next year.
Romo on the Practice Squad is an invitation to losing him. Waiving Hutch or trading him the same. Vinny's age alone is an invitation.

Now maybe people will understand why I advocated Kerry Collins. A whole lot less shaky than what we have right now.

I'll let others rely on Carter. I'll root for him and rely on Henson being equal to the task and hype.

I am already wondering which veteran QBs might be available in 2005. I just prefer that to another draft selection. I don't even have any faith in Hutch or Romo but I still don't want just 2 signal callers next off season if Vinny (hopefully) hangs em up.
Hostile is offline  
Old 07-13-2004   #33
blindzebra
Senior Member
 
blindzebra's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I wish we'd get some news on it.

Let's say for arguments sake we release Hutch, and place Romo on the Practice Squad where we lose him to a team that is injured at QB.

Vinny is a 1 year band aid. That means we go from 5 QBs in 2004 to 2 in 2005.

It could happen.
Actually, after two years of this QB crap, would that be such a bad thing?
blindzebra is offline  
Old 07-13-2004   #34
Nightshade
Senior Member
 
Nightshade's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
AJ, ON, CA
Posts:
1,811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blindzebra
Actually, after two years of this QB crap, would that be such a bad thing?
Two years?
I'd say we've been in QB purgatory for at least 4 years, if you count the uncertainty we had in Aikman's last year or so with all the concussions.

Even though alot of other teams (Pittsburgh, Chicago, Detroit, Washington etc.) have been going through this alot longer, when they signed Henson, I could swear I saw a little light at the end of this sewer pipe.
"Young man, when you throw a strike, Mr. Hornsby will let you know."
Bill Klem when a pitcher questioned a called ball to Rogers Hornsby.

Nightshade is offline  
Old 07-13-2004   #35
blindzebra
Senior Member
 
blindzebra's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightshade
Two years?
I'd say we've been in QB purgatory for at least 4 years, if you count the uncertainty we had in Aikman's last year or so with all the concussions.

Even though alot of other teams (Pittsburgh, Chicago, Detroit, Washington etc.) have been going through this alot longer, when they signed Henson, I could swear I saw a little light at the end of this sewer pipe.
I'm talking QB wars, Nightshade.

This problem started in 94-96 when we should have been drafting QBs to groom.

We should have been using the GB approach, but we kept signing FAs like Kosar and Cunningham and had a #3 QB/coach type with Garrett.

We were completely unprepared for Aikman's retirement.
blindzebra is offline  
Old 07-13-2004   #36
aikemirv
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Virginia
Posts:
7,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Romo on the Practice Squad is an invitation to losing him. Waiving Hutch or trading him the same. Vinny's age alone is an invitation.

Now maybe people will understand why I advocated Kerry Collins. A whole lot less shaky than what we have right now.

I'll let others rely on Carter. I'll root for him and rely on Henson being equal to the task and hype.

I am already wondering which veteran QBs might be available in 2005. I just prefer that to another draft selection. I don't even have any faith in Hutch or Romo but I still don't want just 2 signal callers next off season if Vinny (hopefully) hangs em up.
I agree on the Collins thing, it would have really solidified our QB position for the next few years if QC and Henson just don't work out.

Did he just sign a one year deal?
aikemirv is offline  
Old 07-13-2004   #37
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,384
Default

I would have to say it does not look good for Chad right now, it is ashame we have to give up on him after only 9 starts but sometimes that is the way things go in this league. I do think he will get another oppertunity in the league it just won't be here.
Doomsday101 is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com