
|
11-21-2005
|
#1
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | DC suburb |
Posts: | 27,870 |
|
Yesterday smelled like 2003
A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.
Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?
Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"
What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?
|
|
|
11-21-2005
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2005 |
Posts: | 1,042 |
|
Yeah, this whole thing smells of 2003.
|
|
|
11-21-2005
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | brooklyn |
Posts: | 174 |
|
Well then, here's to the playoffs!
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 3,039 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bbgun
A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.
Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?
Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"
What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?
|
I think not. Our 2003 team crushed the Lions on their own field 38-7, beat the Giants with Kerry Collins on their own field 35-32, beat the Eagles at home convincingly and the Panthers at home convincingly. Except for the Chargers, the only teams we've beaten convincingly are below .500. This team struggles to manage games so much that it is hard for anyone to tell how good we are. We really don't have an identity.
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#5
|
|
Old Testament...
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Vatican City |
Posts: | 28,540 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kartr
the only teams we've beaten convincingly are below .500.
|
true... but technically the iggles are under .500 BECAUSE of us... 
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#6
|
|
Loud pipes saves lives.
Years Donated 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Jarvland, CT |
Posts: | 6,846 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bbgun
A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.
Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?
Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"
What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?
|
They did get a bunch of great jumps...and were offsides a heck of a lot...Lokkit 17 penalties...Yeah, that had good jumps...lol
Be excellent to each other....
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | East Texas |
Posts: | 833 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kartr
I think not. Our 2003 team crushed the Lions on their own field 38-7, beat the Giants with Kerry Collins on their own field 35-32, beat the Eagles at home convincingly and the Panthers at home convincingly. Except for the Chargers, the only teams we've beaten convincingly are below .500. This team struggles to manage games so much that it is hard for anyone to tell how good we are. We really don't have an identity.
|
10/12 W 23-21 Philadelphia
11/23 W 24-20 Carolina
Yeah, convincingly we beat Philadelphia with a defensive sack and fumble at the end of the game.
Last edited by Next_years_Champs : 11-22-2005 at 10:43 AM.
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#8
|
|
Zone Scribe
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 18,239 |
|
The offensive tackles may have struggled in pass protection, but the middle of the OL dominated and ran the ball at will against the Lions interior defense. The only time I saw Shaun Rogers name mentioned was when he was tapping his helmet to get his 385 lbs. obese arse off the field for a breather ... which was pretty much every other play. I may have regrets about not drafting him, but I have no regrets about not signing him to a huge contract.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#9
|
|
All Star
Joined: | Sep 2004 |
Location: | Victoria Tx |
Posts: | 6,817 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bbgun
A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.
Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?
Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"
What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?
|
This team is nothing like the 2003 team in so many ways it’s frustrating to even explain. This thread smells like rotten eggs.
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Austin, TX |
Posts: | 17,960 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Everlastingxxx
This team is nothing like the 2003 team in so many ways it’s frustrating to even explain. This thread smells like rotten eggs.
|
No doubt.
I liked the effort of the 2003 defense. There were some obvious weaknesses with that unit that had to wait until the off season to be fixed. We all saw what happened when the weaknesses weren't addressed in the off season and in fact those positions became worse.
The weakness of today's defense is youth and inexperience. Every week, the unit seems to gel a little more. I like the potential for the defense to improve the rest of the season and definitly the next few seasons without needing a major overhaul.
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 7,301 |
|
What do 2003 mean? 
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2006, 2007, 2009
Joined: | Jan 2005 |
Posts: | 5,343 |
|
The schedules are so different it is just wrong to compare them!
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, Texas |
Posts: | 70,417 |
|
Naw 2003 had a different smell. LOL
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#14
|
|
Rolling Thunder
Joined: | Oct 2004 |
Posts: | 3,710 |
|
When you have a rookie RT and your starting LT goes down in mid season, declining offensive numbers, especially passing numbers will suffer automatically. We'll have good games and bad games...
I don't believe in team motivation. I believe in getting a team prepared so it knows it will have the necessary confidence
when it steps on a field and be prepared to play a good game... Tom Landry
|
|
|
11-22-2005
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 3,039 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Next_years_Champs
10/12 W 23-21 Philadelphia
11/23 W 24-20 Carolina
Yeah, convincingly we beat Philadelphia with a defensive sack and fumble at the end of the game.
|
Would you turn up your nose at either of those scores if we beat the Broncos, Chiefs or Panthers by any of those amounts? Considering that both the Eagles and Panthers had excellent seasons that year, I would think not.
But the main point was that our 3rd year qb outplayed more experienced qb's in big games, and with no running game. We had a substantial the edge in scoring, passing yardage, and time of possession. Our qb brought us from behind against two quality opponents, with no running game and in beating Carolina, we tied for the best record in the NFC. You also seem to forget that when our D got the sack and fumble, our offense had got the lead back for us and it was a defensive breakdown that led to Buckhalter's touchdown run in the first place.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.
|