Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives > 2004 Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2005   #1
bbgun
Banned
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
DC suburb
Posts:
27,870
Default Yesterday smelled like 2003

A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.

Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?

Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"

What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?
bbgun is offline  

Old 11-21-2005   #2
Asklesko
Senior Member
 
Asklesko's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
1,042
Default

Yeah, this whole thing smells of 2003.
Asklesko is offline  
Old 11-21-2005   #3
sad_otter
Senior Member
 
sad_otter's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
brooklyn
Posts:
174
Default

Well then, here's to the playoffs!
sad_otter is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #4
kartr
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
3,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgun
A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.

Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?

Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"

What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?
I think not. Our 2003 team crushed the Lions on their own field 38-7, beat the Giants with Kerry Collins on their own field 35-32, beat the Eagles at home convincingly and the Panthers at home convincingly. Except for the Chargers, the only teams we've beaten convincingly are below .500. This team struggles to manage games so much that it is hard for anyone to tell how good we are. We really don't have an identity.
kartr is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #5
trickblue
Old Testament...
 
trickblue's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Vatican City
Posts:
28,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kartr
the only teams we've beaten convincingly are below .500.
true... but technically the iggles are under .500 BECAUSE of us...
trickblue is online now  
Old 11-22-2005   #6
Jarv
Loud pipes saves lives.
 
Jarv's Avatar
Years Donated
2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Jarvland, CT
Posts:
6,846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgun
A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.

Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?

Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"

What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?

They did get a bunch of great jumps...and were offsides a heck of a lot...Lokkit 17 penalties...Yeah, that had good jumps...lol
Be excellent to each other....
Jarv is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #7
Next_years_Champs
Senior Member
 
Next_years_Champs's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
East Texas
Posts:
833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kartr
I think not. Our 2003 team crushed the Lions on their own field 38-7, beat the Giants with Kerry Collins on their own field 35-32, beat the Eagles at home convincingly and the Panthers at home convincingly. Except for the Chargers, the only teams we've beaten convincingly are below .500. This team struggles to manage games so much that it is hard for anyone to tell how good we are. We really don't have an identity.
10/12 W 23-21 Philadelphia
11/23 W 24-20 Carolina

Yeah, convincingly we beat Philadelphia with a defensive sack and fumble at the end of the game.

Last edited by Next_years_Champs : 11-22-2005 at 10:43 AM.
Next_years_Champs is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #8
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

The offensive tackles may have struggled in pass protection, but the middle of the OL dominated and ran the ball at will against the Lions interior defense. The only time I saw Shaun Rogers name mentioned was when he was tapping his helmet to get his 385 lbs. obese arse off the field for a breather ... which was pretty much every other play. I may have regrets about not drafting him, but I have no regrets about not signing him to a huge contract.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.
InmanRoshi is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #9
Everlastingxxx
All Star
 
Everlastingxxx's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Victoria Tx
Posts:
6,817
Send a message via Yahoo to Everlastingxxx
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbgun
A sputtering offense complimented by a technically effecient (but not aggressive or dominant) defense, all of which came crashing down on T-Giving. Hopefully, the past isn't prelude.

Anyone read Al Johnson's unbelievably defeatist quotes about Detroit's "great, big, and fast" defensive line?

Q: "Why did you struggle today Al?"
A: "They were big and mean! They got great jumps!"

What an excuse-making turd. Can you imagine Stepnoski or Big E complimenting the Niners or Eagles like that?
This team is nothing like the 2003 team in so many ways it’s frustrating to even explain. This thread smells like rotten eggs.
Everlastingxxx is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #10
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Everlastingxxx
This team is nothing like the 2003 team in so many ways it’s frustrating to even explain. This thread smells like rotten eggs.
No doubt.

I liked the effort of the 2003 defense. There were some obvious weaknesses with that unit that had to wait until the off season to be fixed. We all saw what happened when the weaknesses weren't addressed in the off season and in fact those positions became worse.

The weakness of today's defense is youth and inexperience. Every week, the unit seems to gel a little more. I like the potential for the defense to improve the rest of the season and definitly the next few seasons without needing a major overhaul.
joseephuss is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #11
TruBlueCowboy
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,301
Default

What do 2003 mean?
TruBlueCowboy is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #12
fortdick
Senior Member
 
fortdick's Avatar
Years Donated
2006, 2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
5,343
Default

The schedules are so different it is just wrong to compare them!
fortdick is online now  
Old 11-22-2005   #13
Doomsday101
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, Texas
Posts:
70,417
Default

Naw 2003 had a different smell. LOL
Doomsday101 is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #14
Big Country
Rolling Thunder
 
Big Country's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Posts:
3,710
Default

When you have a rookie RT and your starting LT goes down in mid season, declining offensive numbers, especially passing numbers will suffer automatically. We'll have good games and bad games...


I don't believe in team motivation. I believe in getting a team prepared so it knows it will have the necessary confidence
when it steps on a field and be prepared to play a good game... Tom Landry
Big Country is offline  
Old 11-22-2005   #15
kartr
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
3,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Next_years_Champs
10/12 W 23-21 Philadelphia
11/23 W 24-20 Carolina

Yeah, convincingly we beat Philadelphia with a defensive sack and fumble at the end of the game.
Would you turn up your nose at either of those scores if we beat the Broncos, Chiefs or Panthers by any of those amounts? Considering that both the Eagles and Panthers had excellent seasons that year, I would think not.

But the main point was that our 3rd year qb outplayed more experienced qb's in big games, and with no running game. We had a substantial the edge in scoring, passing yardage, and time of possession. Our qb brought us from behind against two quality opponents, with no running game and in beating Carolina, we tied for the best record in the NFC. You also seem to forget that when our D got the sack and fumble, our offense had got the lead back for us and it was a defensive breakdown that led to Buckhalter's touchdown run in the first place.
kartr is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com