BP says "install defense?"

[Star-Fan]

What does he mean, is talking a 3-4 d? Any info?, Thanks!

[Kangaroo]

Changes to the nickel dime packages

Differnt shift stunts and gap assigments depending on defense called

This is installing a defense last year defense will change do to personel change and the changing of the teams we play.

3-4 package etc etc

[VirusX]

Full time? Hell no. Glover would cause the downfall of the defense you have to have a big stud at DT to run a 3-4. Glover is way to small. If the DT fails in a 3-4D the defense is screwed. WE will use a little more 3-4 to get bradie in the mix but Stew will play DT in 3-4 most likely.

[dbair1967]

Originally Posted by Star-Fan

What does he mean, is talking a 3-4 d? Any info?, Thanks!

I read someone there were incorporating some 4-6 looks as well as the 3-4 and their standard defense

they arnt switching defenses

David

[Star-Fan]

Thanks for the repiles. It's good to hear about some work w/3-4, and 4-6.

[Hostile]

Originally Posted by Star-Fan

Thanks for the repiles. It's good to hear about some work w/3-4, and 4-6.

We've been running some 46 schemes?

He must like our front 4.

[jterrell]

Originally Posted by Hostile

We've been running some 46 schemes?

He must like our front 4.

And our backers. 2 of those backers need to be able to cover to run the 46. James must be proving he can blitz. A 46 needs a great LB blitzer and I didnt see anything from the regular group to assume they are plus blitzers.

[dargonking999]

Originally Posted by jterrell

And our backers. 2 of those backers need to be able to cover to run the 46. James must be proving he can blitz. A 46 needs a great LB blitzer and I didnt see anything from the regular group to assume they are plus blitzers.

actaully form what i hear james, dat, and coakley are all great blitzers

[joseephuss]

Originally Posted by dargonking999

actaully form what i hear james, dat, and coakley are all great blitzers

Dat and Coakley? Hopefully they are improving this training camp, but they have been poor blitzers in the past. I am used to seeing them get bumped out of their lanes very easily or taken out one on one with running backs. Granted the lanes have been very small the last few years. Not having to assign a blocker for Ekuban kind of clogs up the middle.

[trickblue]

Originally Posted by Hostile

We've been running some 46 schemes?

He must like our front 4.

Yep... Mickey said they ran a few plays in a 46 type formation...

[Hollywood Henderson]

Yep, a great blitzing LBer must be able to overpower a RB's block...lil Coke & lil Dat never could do that...

[Chocolate Lab]

Originally Posted by trickblue

Yep... Mickey said they ran a few plays in a 46 type formation...

I'd love to see that... Roy Williams = Doug Plank

We'd have to rename it the "31 defense".

[Nors]

Interesting, I'll have to see the 4-6 looks but I bet it has Roy playing LB.

yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3-4 a happening! Not changing, YET. Maybe swings more 3-4 in 2005

Then you can play both 4-3 AND 3-4.

[Nors]

Originally Posted by VirusX

Full time? Hell no. Glover would cause the downfall of the defense you have to have a big stud at DT to run a 3-4. Glover is way to small. If the DT fails in a 3-4D the defense is screwed. WE will use a little more 3-4 to get bradie in the mix but Stew will play DT in 3-4 most likely.

Said he was all set at NT, DE in 3-4. He was concerned about ILB. See Shanle post above. He's doing well. We are working the 3-4 this camp. It is going to be implemented and used in some capacity - JMO.

[Nors]

Originally Posted by jterrell

And our backers. 2 of those backers need to be able to cover to run the 46. James must be proving he can blitz. A 46 needs a great LB blitzer and I didnt see anything from the regular group to assume they are plus blitzers.

They will see the vision. The 4-6 is being used for ROY. He's the best damn blitzer we have. Move him around.