
|
05-01-2006
|
#1
|
|
...Abbey someone
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Merrick, New Yor |
Posts: | 22,270 |
|
Hey... How did Henson look?
I didn't have a chance to watch the game...or the replay...first time that has happened this year.
Thanks.
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Virginia |
Posts: | 7,014 |
|
I thought he looked pretty good. The best of one of his drives, from the announcers perspective, was not shown because of tech difficulties with the feed I guess, but he played pretty well in my book
13-21 and 2 tds and over 200 yrds. Almost had a pick at the goal line but if I am correct the WR's route was run incorrectly and the defender was allowed inside position. Nevertheless, even ahd the WR run the proper route the pass would have been a bit behind but not the easy pick that it could have been.
A lot of Henson throws, which are not necessarily accurate and possible picks are thrown so hard that the defenders don't catch them.
In perspective though, Chang wass 4-6 for 150 yards with 2 TD's and 1 pick. Needless to say, the Rhein WR's were as open as I have seen them all season long and Starling actually had good seperation on many plays.
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | May 2005 |
Location: | Chesterfield, VA |
Posts: | 7,940 |
|
Henson was 13/21 for 219 yds and 1 TD
Chang was 4/6 for 141 yds, 2 TD and an int
The offense seemed to sputter with Henson in there. He played adequately, but nothing spectacular. I actually thought Chang looked better.
http://www.nfleurope.com/scores/stat..._ber_rhe_stats
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Virginia |
Posts: | 7,014 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kilyin
Henson was 13/21 for 219 yds and 1 TD
Chang was 4/6 for 141 yds, 2 TD and an int
The offense seemed to sputter with Henson in there. He played adequately, but nothing spectacular. I actually thought Chang looked better.
http://www.nfleurope.com/scores/stat..._ber_rhe_stats
|
I disagree that the offense sputtered unless you are blaming him for the first drive drop by the WR and the 3 fumbles by the RB when he was in there.
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 5,390 |
|
theebs? Is there going to be a replay?
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#6
|
|
K9NME
Years Donated 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, TX |
Posts: | 10,274 |
|
They didn't show the game @ 3 yesterday. I have my pvr set to record it today @ 2, hopefully it comes on this time.
“Hit them in the mouth, bloody their nose, throw them to the ground and step on their throat!”--Brooking, Pregame Huddle 2009
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Erwin, TN |
Posts: | 919 |
|
Maybe it's just me, but when Henson is in the game the offensive play calling seems to be more dink and dunk. They brought Chang in and he seemed to really ignite the offense. But they let him throw the ball down the field more imo.
I thought Henson looked pretty good overall. He looked great on those last couple of drives, one to tie the game(td) and one to win it(fg). On those two drives, they seem to loosen the reigns a little and let Henson throw down the field.
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 163 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aikemirv
I disagree that the offense sputtered unless you are blaming him for the first drive drop by the WR and the 3 fumbles by the RB when he was in there.
|
Here are Henson's drives:
1 - 2-4 9 yards - Punt
2 - 3/3 42 yards - RB fumbles
3 - 1/3 31 yards - Punt
4 - 1/3 56 yards - FG
5 - RB fumbles on 1st play, No passes
6 - RB fumbles on 2nd play, No passes
7 - 6/7 81 yards - 18 yard TD pass
8 - 4 running plays 27 yards GW FG, No passes
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Virginia |
Posts: | 7,014 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StarMan
Maybe it's just me, but when Henson is in the game the offensive play calling seems to be more dink and dunk. They brought Chang in and he seemed to really ignite the offense. But they let him throw the ball down the field more imo.
I thought Henson looked pretty good overall. He looked great on those last couple of drives, one to tie the game(td) and one to win it(fg). On those two drives, they seem to loosen the reigns a little and let Henson throw down the field.
|
There is no doubt that the offensive plan is a pass first plan when Chang is in and a very balanced attack when Henson is in. I have seen it in every game that Chang has played and I just think it is there way to get Chang a lot of throws in a short period of time.
Chang is not a bad player and I think he should have gone to a team where he could have been the starter. He is better than some of the straters on the other teams.
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2010, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Euless, TX |
Posts: | 6,926 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StarMan
Maybe it's just me, but when Henson is in the game the offensive play calling seems to be more dink and dunk. They brought Chang in and he seemed to really ignite the offense. But they let him throw the ball down the field more imo.
I thought Henson looked pretty good overall. He looked great on those last couple of drives, one to tie the game(td) and one to win it(fg). On those two drives, they seem to loosen the reigns a little and let Henson throw down the field.
|
I think they put each player in what he is comfortable and what maybe their NFL coaches want them to do. Earlier, I think they tried to have Chang in behind the center, but he seems to have struggled there. But lately they are mostly going Shot gun with him, where he seems comfortable.
And yeah, Chang swings the ball around a lot and gives the ball away a lot too, especially in Red Zone. But I think he would have been better off as QB of another team, since I think Chang is better than couple of other QBs in other teams in NFLE.
Personally this game, I thought Henson didn't look as good as I thought he should have except for fourth quarter, especially when it mattered most it seems like. Thats a reason to be real happy. I personally thought even if stats don't show etc., he had a better game last week, when the team lost than this week, since last week he barely had time to setup, while this week he had enough protection, but not as accurate as I thought he should be, well in first half anyway.
Next weeks should be a good one, since that game might decide world bowl place.
A is A
"It is...as necessary to defend an individual against the majority in a democracy as against the king in a monarchy." - John Adams
"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within. " - W. Durant
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 23,316 |
|
Henson is the 2nd highest rated passer in NFLE with an 87.6 rating. He has shown increasing poise and leadership -- his stats also are a bit deflated by the awful O-line and receiving talent around him. The OL problems present a good challenge for him and make the game more similar to what he'll experience in the NFL. The WR stuff though is just bad play. Every game his guys drop several well thrown balls.
All in all, I'd say at this point it looks like his spot on the team next year is totally secure.
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#12
|
|
Anomaly
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | The Cowboyszone |
Posts: | 875 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by abersonc
All in all, I'd say at this point it looks like his spot on the team next year is totally secure.
|
Agreed.
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Location: | Fort Bragg |
Posts: | 321 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jbz64
Here are Henson's drives:
1 - 2-4 9 yards - Punt
2 - 3/3 42 yards - RB fumbles
3 - 1/3 31 yards - Punt
4 - 1/3 56 yards - FG
5 - RB fumbles on 1st play, No passes
6 - RB fumbles on 2nd play, No passes
7 - 6/7 81 yards - 18 yard TD pass
8 - 4 running plays 27 yards GW FG, No passes
|
Man, who is the freaking running back? Henson should throw every down.
 THANKS JUKE!!
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2010, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Euless, TX |
Posts: | 6,926 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by juice28
Man, who is the freaking running back? Henson should throw every down.
|
Actually his RBs as are usually good, especially Jackson, but unusual for them, they had I think 3 fumbles yesterday, especially two costly ones, which cost them points.
I think thats why the last two drives, especially one that Henson took them for TD, after a second fumble and score was impressive. Since seems like team was in dire straits after seemingly in control of game, with those turnovers, now trailing by a score.
A is A
"It is...as necessary to defend an individual against the majority in a democracy as against the king in a monarchy." - John Adams
"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within. " - W. Durant
|
|
|
05-01-2006
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Virginia |
Posts: | 7,014 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RCowboyFan
Actually his RBs as are usually good, especially Jackson, but unusual for them, they had I think 3 fumbles yesterday, especially two costly ones, which cost them points.
I think thats why the last two drives, especially one that Henson took them for TD, after a second fumble and score was impressive. Since seems like team was in dire straits after seemingly in control of game, with those turnovers, now trailing by a score.
|
They had Henson miked up for the game and I took a couple of things from that. The pass that almost got int at the endzone was one in which the Wr was supposed to keep crossing rather than cut into the endzone and I believe it was late in the game before he said something to the effect that he had not had a chance to get into a good rythm until then.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.
|