DCcom. blog: What's Left For The O-Line?

[Gryphon]

Well, not much, really. The Cowboys are more settled there than you might think.

Let’s quickly go down the line, so to speak:

Bill Parcells seems encouraged by Flozell Adams’ progress with his surgically-repaired knee. That’s a good sign for the line’s most important player.

Seems like a good situation at left guard. Parcells is pleased with both Kyle Kosier and Cory Procter. Always nice to have a guy like Kosier, who has played every line spot but center.

Center isn’t settled yet, but Al Johnson and Andre Gurode rotated there last year. No rookies or injury questions at this spot. The two might even rotate again this year.

Marco Rivera’s back to 100 percent after suffering an off-season back injury last year. Nuff said.

Right tackle? Hmm…should know something soon. My prediction: Colombo wins the job in part because of Petitti’s experience at left tackle. He knows both spots and the Cowboys need a swing guy. That breaks a close tie.

Published Friday, August 18, 2006 7:01 PM by rphillips

[RealCowboyfan]

I feel that our O-Line is underrated. When you have a statue for a Quarterback in Bledsoe, of course a whole lot of sacks will be given up. But if you have Tony Romo, it wouldn't be too many sacks given up, and more O-Lineman would make it to the pro bowl.

[WilmingtonHeel]

Not too bad but it remains to be seen

[jazzcat22]

Originally Posted by RealCowboyfan

I feel that our O-Line is underrated. When you have a statue for a Quarterback in Bledsoe, of course a whole lot of sacks will be given up. But if you have Tony Romo, it wouldn't be too many sacks given up, and more O-Lineman would make it to the pro bowl.

Turning it into a QB controversy thread? Or just being sarcastic?

[DragonCowboy]

Man, we're getting too many mixed signals:

Some writers say we're in dire trouble.

Other writers say that our OL will be just fine.

[AbeBeta]

Originally Posted by DragonCowboy

Man, we're getting too many mixed signals:

Some writers say we're in dire trouble.

Other writers say that our OL will be just fine.

notice that no one is saying it will be great. it won't. but hopefully we'll be in a position next year that one solid line addition is going to make it great

[theogt]

Originally Posted by abersonc

notice that no one is saying it will be great. it won't. but hopefully we'll be in a position next year that one solid line addition is going to make it great

You mean the addition of a mobile QB like .... say .... ROMO?!?!

[MONT17]

let me just say this if the OL was fine then why is it such a HOT TOPIC? have u seen these guys... not much to write about if they were good!!!

the Cowboys play in the NFCE where 2 teams use blitzing on a regular basis to get to the QB the other has added a PASS RUSHING DE and OLB to one of the best pass rushing tandems in the NFL!


ok or good may not cut it with a QB who cant read a defense, I mean, tries to be the hero every play!!!

[theogt]

Originally Posted by MONT17

let me just say this if the OL was fine then why is it such a HOT TOPIC? have u seen these guys... not much to write about if they were good!!!

the Cowboys play in the NFCE where 2 teams use blitzing on a regular basis to get to the QB the other has added a PASS RUSHING DE and OLB to one of the best pass rushing tandems in the NFL!


ok or good may not cut it with a QB who cant read a defense, I mean, tries to be the hero every play!!!

Because it's the weakest point on a very strong team. FS used to be a major area of concern discussed almost every day, but now we're hopeful that Watkins is the long-term answer. DT is an area of concern, but Ferguson has had a good camp and performed well in the Seattle game, and he is backed up with Pepper who seems to be coming along well (and there's also Mont. Stanley who should come on strong next season).

Other than that everything else is filled by good to great players? Let's go through the list.

DL - Check
LBs - Check
DBs - Check
RBs - Check
WRs - Check
TEs - Check
QB - Check

I guarantee you that if we had a legitimate QB controversy and no depth at WR or LB you wouldn't hear a peep about the Oline. It would be considered a strong-point on the team (that wouldn't necessarily be a good thing either), but since every other position is sound, it gets the most attention.

[kojak]

Originally Posted by RealCowboyfan

I feel that our O-Line is underrated. When you have a statue for a Quarterback in Bledsoe, of course a whole lot of sacks will be given up. But if you have Tony Romo, it wouldn't be too many sacks given up, and more O-Lineman would make it to the pro bowl.

Well not really. Romo may have the ability to buy himself some more time than what Bledsoe could. But our line is still stinking it up in the running game. I didn't see alot of running lanes opened up the other night.

[AMERICAS_FAN]

Originally Posted by DragonCowboy

Man, we're getting too many mixed signals: Some writers say we're in dire trouble. Other writers say that our OL will be just fine.

Did you see Jason Wittwen on "NFL's Total Access"? They asked him something like: What's the one story in camp that you you think the media has passed over or not taked about enough?" Jason's answer was about the OL and he said something like: The OL has been much improved and will be good this season to help along the passing and running game. I thought that was interesting because it's the first time this offseason that good publicity about the OL is coming from a palyer who had to play more blocking schemes last year because the OL was suspect. It sdounded like Witten was more focused on being a reciever again in the passing game, and that can only happen if the OL is indeed improved.

AF

[DragonCowboy]

Originally Posted by kojak_DD

Well not really. Romo may have the ability to buy himself some more time than what Bledsoe could. But our line is still stinking it up in the running game. I didn't see alot of running lanes opened up the other night.

Yeah, I didn't see the game, but how did JJ look? He only had 14 yards off 7 carries, so that really worries me, esp. if Seattle was playing backups.

[kojak]

Originally Posted by DragonCowboy

Yeah, I didn't see the game, but how did JJ look? He only had 14 yards off 7 carries, so that really worries me, esp. if Seattle was playing backups.

The line was horrible trying to open up holes for the running game. The run up the middle which Parcells seems to love so much was nothing but a pile of bodie. JJ had to scrape just to get any yards, same goes for Barber. Kincaid(sp) done a good job of adjusting around the line to find lanes for himself. I thought he was the best running back the other night.

[Idgit]

Originally Posted by DragonCowboy

Yeah, I didn't see the game, but how did JJ look? He only had 14 yards off 7 carries, so that really worries me, esp. if Seattle was playing backups.

He looked better than his stat line. I thought he hit the runs betweeen the tackles aggressively, there just wasn't anywhere to go at that point. He showed his cutback ability on a play or two. A few of his best plays were called back by unnecesary penalties, too, though they were passes. He didn't play all that much, of course.

It'll be important to have our starters set after the NO game, so the first team can work together as a unit on the pulling we're going to be doing this year for the rest of preseason.

[DragonCowboy]

Originally Posted by kojak_DD

The line was horrible trying to open up holes for the running game. The run up the middle which Parcells seems to love so much was nothing but a pile of bodie. JJ had to scrape just to get any yards, same goes for Barber. Kincaid(sp) done a good job of adjusting around the line to find lanes for himself. I thought he was the best running back the other night.

Originally Posted by Idgit

He looked better than his stat line. I thought he hit the runs betweeen the tackles aggressively, there just wasn't anywhere to go at that point. He showed his cutback ability on a play or two. A few of his best plays were called back by unnecesary penalties, too, though they were passes. He didn't play all that much, of course.

It'll be important to have our starters set after the NO game, so the first team can work together as a unit on the pulling we're going to be doing this year for the rest of preseason.

so the OL is at fault, and not the RB?

Hopefully we can see a better OL at Shreveport.