Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-22-2007   #16
Roughneck
Senior Member
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Central Texas
Posts:
2,682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins View Post
i odnt watch college sports for the same reson that i odnt watch minor league baseball so ill have to take your owrd on that.
Any chance we could get that in English?


Accept No Substitute
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #17
LatinMind
iPhotoshop
 
LatinMind's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
5,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins View Post
i odnt watch college sports for the same reson that i odnt watch minor league baseball so ill have to take your owrd on that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dakota
The guy had 3100 yards and 41 TDs in 3 years. Like i say, he's a guy that could end up getting you around 1K and 10+TDs a year in the NFL. i'd take that!!!!!!!!!!!!


these numbers might have said it better

Newest Wallpapers Dez|Cowboys Apocalypse
http://latinmind.deviantart.com/#/d5rkvym
Twitter
@CowboysRMX2011
LatinMind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #18
Big Dakota
Senior Member
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Nov 2005
Posts:
11,875
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck View Post
Any chance we could get that in English?






Fuuzzy Lump is always a laughing stock.
Big Dakota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #19
FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
 
FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Nowhereland
Posts:
13,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck View Post
Any chance we could get that in English?

If you couldnt read that because of the typos then you may want to see a neurologist.
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins

Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
FuzzyLumpkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #20
FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
 
FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Nowhereland
Posts:
13,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dakota View Post



Fuuzzy Lump is always a laughing stock.
And exactly how is that?
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins

Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
FuzzyLumpkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #21
SDogo
Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ever was.
 
SDogo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Location:
Falconer, NY
Posts:
13,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinMind View Post
lol i love when people bring up videos of games. especially when talking about draft prospects. and thinking a guy with a fast 40 time in the combine is so much better then a player that shows it on the field.

i dont care what people say about jarret, the guy is awsome in games. and unlike bowe and meacham and ginn. he's done it his whole career. not just the first yr they were eligible for the draft
I love when people don't realize it works both ways. Your using the same reasoning for Jarrett everyone used for Mike Williams (yes I compared) Just because they look great on tape at the college level does not mean they will make great pro's. Scouting is projecting how a player will produce in the NFL, not how he made 100+ college defensive backs whom 98% of which will never play a down in the NFL look.
Quote:
It takes a genius to whine appealingly.
SDogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #22
da_whiz_kid
Senior Member
 
da_whiz_kid's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeOfLegends View Post
I love when people don't realize it works both ways. Your using the same reasoning for Jarrett everyone used for Mike Williams (yes I compared) Just because they look great on tape at the college level does not mean they will make great pro's. Scouting is projecting how a player will produce in the NFL, not how he made 100+ college defensive backs whom 98% of which will never play a down in the NFL look.

TRUE. BUT, Mike Williams took a whole year off not working out and was in HORRIBLE condition. Jarrett has played and should be football fresh. And at the time Mike Williams was a good receiver coming out of college but he PROVED that he wasn't fit for a starting role in the NFL once he got in. Until Jarrett actually gets in the NFL and does bad or good, he IS the second best reciever in this draft until he proves not to be. But I do see what u are saying. It's just there are a lot of people who jumped on player's bandwagons after the combine(Meachem). Not saying Meachem is bad, he is good, it's just Jarrett has 3 yrs of ripping apart secondaries, with two different QBs, and a year without Bush. Meachem only has one good year.
If you build it, he will run...
da_whiz_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #23
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,188
Default

Jarret took too many plays off- there were whole games that he could have dominated and did not. I do not want a WR that we have to motivate; I do not want ANY player that needs that.
burmafrd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #24
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
 
Alexander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
18,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano View Post
just to reiterate, I would be kind of PO'd w/ Jarrett in the 1st
I would not be angry, just skeptical.

It is easy to see that Jarrett is getting some bad publicity for things Mike Williams has done and is being stigmatized. But he also doesn't offer much more than being a simple possession receiver.

Right now, I have a hard time seeing how he could make it on the field for us.

It is not like he's going to return punts in the NFL. Some of the other wide receivers we could take at the same point in the draft can and will.
Alexander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #25
PJCOWBOYS
Senior Member
 
PJCOWBOYS's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
388
Default

To me a reciever in the NFL has to be able to be physical when he comes across the middle of the field or not be shy with contact in that aspect. Some reports I have read on Jarrett say this "Needs to get stronger and be more physical...".

But I wouldn't mind him as our pick. We need a big recievier and the guy is athletic and would be a terror in the red zone.
"I like ideas about breaking away or overthrowing of established order. I am interested in revolt, disorder, chaos -- especially activity that seems to have no meaning. It seems to me to be the road toward freedom -- external revolt is a way to bring about internal freedom." - JIM MORRISON
PJCOWBOYS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #26
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
 
Alexander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
18,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJCOWBOYS View Post
To me a reciever in the NFL has to be able to be physical when he comes across the middle of the field or not be shy with contact in that aspect. Some reports I have read on Jarrett say this "Needs to get stronger and be more physical...".

But I wouldn't mind him as our pick. We need a big recievier and the guy is athletic and would be a terror in the red zone.
He is not a shrinking violet when it comes to contact the times I have watched him play.

I think you might have read a bad scouting report. Half the time you can read five and at least two will have contradictory or just completely wrong information in them.
Alexander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #27
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Dwayne Jarrett is a good football player. The only thing some will not like about him is that he is a bit of a hot dog.

I do rank him behind Meacham and Bowe as far as targets for us at WR because Meacham is faster and Bowe runs cleaner routes. I also like their attitudes better, especially Meacham who seems like a down to earth kid to me. If we end up with Dwayne Jarrett it will NOT be the end of the world. The kid can play.

BTW, I prefer big, physical WRs and these 3 fit the bill. Jarrett is probably the most physical of the 3. In the NFL that can be a very good thing. As much as I dislike USC, this kid can play and be an important factor.
Hostile is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #28
Teague31
Defender of the Star
 
Teague31's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Location:
Ozark, Missouri
Posts:
5,472
Default

anyone know what jarrett ran at the combine or if he has run at his pro day?
Teague31 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #29
conner01
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
1,847
Default

i would rather have neachum or bowe if we went wr. i just don't see jarrett ever being a #1 wr. i hope i'm wrong for his sake but he just reminds me of another kid in detriot way to much.if not meachum or bowe give me a cb
conner01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007   #30
WoodysGirl
Instincts to another flow
 
WoodysGirl's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
58,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teague31 View Post
anyone know what jarrett ran at the combine or if he has run at his pro day?
USC hasn't had their pro day yet. I believe theirs is on the 28th. Jarrett he didn't run at the combine.
Thank you to all donated to the Jason Witten Camp drive!

WoodysGirl is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com