All these trade back threads reminder

Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by 44cowboys22, Apr 16, 2013.

  1. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Backwoods Sexy Staff Member

    68,134 Messages
    15,495 Likes Received
    Yes he said he thought it was 16 but he would try to confirm or find out later.
  2. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Backwoods Sexy Staff Member

    68,134 Messages
    15,495 Likes Received
    I always find it amusing when they kind of say...Well we only had X number (always less than 32 and usually in the teens) players as first round players but when they take someone in the second round they say...We had him graded as a first rounder.

    IOW sometimes what is said prior to the draft and what is said afterward is a bunch of bologna. :D
  3. DBOY3141

    DBOY3141 Well-Known Member

    5,671 Messages
    2,648 Likes Received
    Not worried about 1st round. Last few years we've gotten production, heck the only one I can think of is Bobby Carpenter who was a bust. Others didn't turn into superstars, but at least produced.

    It's after the 1st round that I'm concerned about.
  4. SkinsandTerps

    SkinsandTerps Redskins Forever

    7,607 Messages
    110 Likes Received
    Why not trade up for one of those few players graded so highly ?
  5. BrAinPaiNt

    BrAinPaiNt Backwoods Sexy Staff Member

    68,134 Messages
    15,495 Likes Received
    Hold it down Saboteur. ;) :p:
  6. DFWJC

    DFWJC Well-Known Member

    35,225 Messages
    14,758 Likes Received

    Just fyi though, those picks that I posted were some players that could have been chosen after the trade downs at the spots we end3ed up drafting from.

    We had no business trading down so much in a weak draft, I agree, but the bottom line is always what you do with the picks you have. And clearly there was opportunity even after the trade downs.
  7. conner01

    conner01 Well-Known Member

    6,326 Messages
    2,625 Likes Received
    i bet alot of people who have won the lottery would disagree with this thought:laugh2:
    just because something does'nt work everytime, does'nt mean it won't work sometimes. no single invention has ever worked perfectly the first can find plenty of examples where we have traded back and made good picks. the trade back was not the problem in 09, the players picked were the problem
  8. reddyuta

    reddyuta Well-Known Member

    12,563 Messages
    5,194 Likes Received
    indeed.just look at our recent 4th rd picks,its a bloodbath with some players who should have been UDFAs selected in the 4th for no reason.
  9. 44cowboys22

    44cowboys22 Well-Known Member

    1,304 Messages
    872 Likes Received
    Finally someone understands my post...if they were willing to trade up for Mo, why in the hell trade back!!!
  10. HoosierCowboy

    HoosierCowboy Put Pearson in the HOF

    2,295 Messages
    276 Likes Received
    if non of the top o-linemen are left and someone is desperate and gave us their first and a second, I'd do it--lots of good DL, OL, and Safeties will be around later
  11. xwalker

    xwalker Well-Known Member

    27,265 Messages
    18,288 Likes Received
    Darn it with all these people that didn't understand your post. We must have some reading comprehension issues or something...
  12. 44cowboys22

    44cowboys22 Well-Known Member

    1,304 Messages
    872 Likes Received
  13. Mr_Bill

    Mr_Bill Member

    383 Messages
    5 Likes Received
    Try this argument:

    Every draft is different, and has its own strengths and weaknesses. What will work in one year may not work in the next one.

    The circumstances surrounding the selection of Claiborne were unique in that he was the top defensive player on their board and they regarded him as the best cornerback prospect to come along in years - and he reached a point where they could afford to get him. Do those circumstances exist this year?

    This draft does not appear to me to be all that strong at the top. On the other hand, every draft 'expert' I have read has stated that this draft is deep in talent in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, particularly in the areas that Dallas has needs. Does that not argue for trading down?

    Finally, what makes you think that the Cowboys will not screw up their choice if the stay put or trade up? Why do you think the odds are better than if they trade down?

    I am not advocating trading down for the Cowboys, although I believe it has some merit this year. That is because I do not know what their final board will look like, nor do I have the slightest idea how this draft will play out. Neither does anyone else. But, I am certainly not going to rule it out just because they screwed things up in 2009.
  14. Verdict

    Verdict Well-Known Member

    6,408 Messages
    1,890 Likes Received
    If the OP's logic is sound we should look for a QB in the 6th because that was the round that Brady was drafted in. I understand the OP's thought process but it is flawed. Just because something worked or failed to work in a given situation doesn't mean that the result will be the same the next time you try that strategy. Moreover the talent, distribution of that talent, and team needs from draft to draft vary widely from year to year to rule out a given strategy.
  15. joseephuss

    joseephuss Well-Known Member

    24,496 Messages
    3,104 Likes Received
    The last time Dallas drafted 18th overall they ended up with Bobby Carpenter. Perhaps trading down would have been a better move.
  16. CyberB0b

    CyberB0b Village Idiot

    7,139 Messages
    4,746 Likes Received
    Drafting my grandma would have been a better move.

Share This Page