Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by Steven_81, Jan 26, 2012.
would u give romo and a 1st and 2nd round pick for andrew luck??
Yes, I would.
It's a big gamble, but I'd take that chance that I'd be getting the next great QB at the beginning of his pro career.
i love romo but would like to get the future qb
Well, the Cowboys would never do it, so don't get your hopes up.
I would but the Colts wouldn't.
i know they wont that is just my wish list ahahaha
Great QB play in the NFL is too rare to give up 5 years of it in the hope of finding a younger player you hope ends up as good. Much less throwing in the extra picks. I'd much rather scout for the next Drew Brees at the top of the second.
Hate to brake it to you but Romo is pretty far from great. Hes good but great is a strong word that doesnt apply to many, and Romo just isnt in that class.
Id take both Luck and RG3 over Romo right now no doubt.
and you are truly blind
Romo can only dream.
Yup blinded by our 1 playoff win....Im not a Romo hater and Im fine with the fact that he isnt going anywhere anytime soon. But Romo a great QB? Thats just flat out untrue. Anybody who thinks that is clearly a homer.
Not a proverbial snowball's chance. The median first overall pick QB of the last 20 years is David Carr.
I'll keep the last 3-4 good years of my top quartile QB, thanks, and we can gamble on someone else later - and that's straight up. I certainly ain't throwing in two more high draft picks to get a worse player!
Not just no, but HELL no. I'm not even a big Romo fan, but that's waaay too much to give up for a POTENTIALLY great QB. If i'm Indy i jump all over that, and focus on rebuilding my team with a proven NFL QB.
the whole 1 playoff win thing, doesn't really hold weight when you truly examine the defense he's played with in the past few years, along w/ the poor O-line. No way i get that emotional and risk my team's future for an unproven QB.
If he busts, you are through.
not to mention, you can probably get more picks for Manning.
And there it is. Right on cue.
You had an opinion, you were doing well in posting it, someone didn't agree and without fail, cause you have nothing to back up your opinion of it, or are too lazy to do so, you go right to the homer tagline.
The sign of a person with a truly weak argument or no confidence in their opinion at all.
As for the question...yeah I'd likely do it. If I thought that Luck would what was needed around him and I felt pretty good that giving up multiple high round picks wasn't going to set the rest of the team back so far that it would hinder Luck.
Which isn't a shot at Romo in the least, because I happen to believe Romo is great and is in that top 5-7 range in the NFL at this point. I believe the Cowboys can win with him, and should win with him.
But if we could get Luck, with the possibility of him being everything people thinks he's going to be, yeah that's a pretty special player then.
OF course that could backfire right in your face but that's part of the NFL. The Gamble.
There is no argument. Do I really need to bring up Romo's stats VS the top 4 QB's in the league? Do I have to bring up the lack winning in his career? I thought it was all very obvious and unnecessary.
Funny that you say these things, and the mock in your sig STILL doesn't include an OL. Give the guy a break, and less give him a decent O-Line!
To be quite honest I don't care what you have. I just find it funny that instead of simply saying why someone has this or that opinion they go immediately to name calling and labeling.
When that's the standard for the person then I don't worry about giving their thoughts, or opinions, much merit. Even when their initial thoughts or opinion could possibly have had some interesting discussion.
So yeah whey don't you post those stats against the top 4 QBs and see how they compare.
Oh, I know why you didn't, because his stats fair very favorably with the top 5 QBs in the league.
And I'm sure when you're done with the winning part of it that you'll be posting said winning numbers for the other 21 positions on the starting teams? You know since winning is a team accomplishment where as individual stats are just that, individual.
Probably not huh? Better to resort to your name calling and labeling cause it's quicker and easier.
I like the first 2 picks in his mock, though I definately feel we need to improve the interior O-Line.
After his first 2 picks i'm not liking any of it.