News: Article: FWST - Defense leaves Cowboys in quandary

Discussion in 'News Zone' started by MichaelWinicki, Sep 14, 2004.

  1. MichaelWinicki

    MichaelWinicki "You want some?" Staff Member

    41,502 Messages
    14,364 Likes Received
    Defense leaves Cowboys in quandary

    Front seven can't hide from blame for Minnesota debacle

    By Jennifer Floyd Engel

    Star-Telegram Staff Writer

    IRVING - Cowboys coach Bill Parcells sounded Monday a little like a kid who discovered the "Kick Me" sign on his back was put there by his best friend.

    He expected his inexperienced secondary to have a few hiccups. Especially against Minnesota's explosive offense.

    He expected his running game to be a work in progress. Especially with rookie Julius Jones inactive.

    His 11-man defensive group, though -- he expected more from them. What he got instead, watching them twice fail to hold the rope after Vinny Testaverde and the offense had clawed the Cowboys back to within four points in Sunday's game, both surprised and disappointed Parcells.

    "I'm hard-pressed to find one guy I think played to his potential on defense, not one," Parcells said. "I don't know what it was, but that wasn't the same group I've seen out there in the past."

    Parcells is talking about a defense that more Sundays than not said: "Come with me," almost single-handedly dragging the Cowboys into the playoffs last season. They have shown Parcells what they are capable of and, as a result, he has expectations. For them to not simply struggle, but fail to compete, had to feel like a punch to the stomach.

    "I think you can go through them one by one and be pretty accurate," Parcells said when asked if defensive end Marcellus Wiley was ineffective. "I have been through it. It wasn't good news for anybody."

    His is not another specific rant about the shortcomings of cornerback Pete Hunter and safety Tony Dixon, or what the secondary lacks generally. They are what they are. Parcells warned in training camp there would be growing pains, but he planned to stick with what they had. He reiterated both points Monday.

    Parcells said he "didn't want to give up on what I think is some reasonable ability" and he was going to "try to take them through the year and see where we are."

    It is a situation not unlike what the Cowboys had on offense last season. They had shortcomings, like a lack of quick-strike ability, which had to be offset by a conservative game plan and a dominant defense.

    The Cowboys have to play a complementary game on offense, as close to the game of keep-away they played with Minnesota in the first quarter Sunday as humanly possible, as well as implement a slightly more conservative defensive plan. Blitzing cannot be the sole provider of the pass rush.

    "We don't have to blitz to get to the quarterback," a testy defensive end Greg Ellis said. "We can get there."

    Except they didn't. Not Sunday. Not with four.

    Daunte Culpepper had plenty of time to pass. Not that the lack of consistent pressure from the front four is anything new. "Why must you blitz to pressure the quarterback?" has been a pressing question for the Cowboys' defense ever since Charles Haley and Tony Tolbert left town.

    "And until we do it consistently, there is going to be the same old questions," defensive end La'Roi Glover said. "Sure you want to sack him, but if you are not going to be able to sack him, just pressure him, contain him, don't let him scramble."

    The pressure is on the front four to help out the secondary until the secondary can help itself. They didn't do that Sunday. Nor did the linebackers.

    There is enough blame for every defensive player.

    While you can't blame them for doing whatever is necessary to stop wide receiver Randy Moss from single-handedly beating them, they also took safety Roy Williams out. He did not blitz. They had a couple called for him, but the offense made them check out of them. His appearance in the box was minimal.

    "Yeah, probably a little bit," Parcells conceded when asked if they had gone away from what makes Williams a game-changer by their game plan. "It's by choice because we wanted to try and keep Moss from being a major factor."

    The choice was not so much faulty as their unwillingness to deviate from it.

    "I want to do whatever the coach wants to get executed," Williams said. "If that means we want to double-cover Moss, then I'll double-cover Moss. I'm not going to be an individual talking about how I need to pad my stats. I'm a team player."

    What needs to be done now is for Williams to help keep the secondary together.

    The guys up front are the ones who need to prove to Parcells they are part of the solution, not the problem.
  2. Hollywood Henderson

    Hollywood Henderson Benched

    3,329 Messages
    0 Likes Received
    I don't want to hear about having a dominant D last year, we were good vs poor to average teams and we sucked vs good teams...

    What no mention of zimmy's huge raise in the offseason?

    No word of blame of the clueless DC?
  3. Eddie

    Eddie Well-Known Member

    11,799 Messages
    2,442 Likes Received

    The DC didn't blow coverages. The DC didn't get swallowed up by Mt McKinney. The DC wasn't chasing Onterrio Smith. The DC didn't cover Moss. The DC didn't fumble inside the 20. The DC didn't blotch the snap on the FG attempt.
  4. jterrell

    jterrell Penguinite

    23,109 Messages
    3,767 Likes Received
    I love all the overreaction.
    Its like dealing with 4 year olds.

    Last season we got torched week 1 by Non-NFL QB Doug Johnson. We followed that up allowing the Giants best offensive game of the season. After that tho we had the defense fail to show up only twice more. Miami on Thanksgiving and the playoff game against Carolina. In between the defense was good enough to end up ranked 1st.

    Any guess who was number 2 and how they did week 1?

    Its wayyyy too early to get overexcited. The anemic Buffalo offense scored at will against the Pats last year yet the Pats ended up OK on defense right?

    And Hollywood the Zimmer rants are as empty and meaningless as the current Carter rants. Pick new topics and move on man.

    Minnesota is a legit selection as the best offense in the league. They've got 4 good WRs including a very, very good one. 2 or 3 very good RBs and a 265 QB who can shake off blocks and run for first downs. We won't be the last team to give up 35 points to them. It was not a funw ay to begin the season but now it sunderway and time to focus on the very average CLE offense.
  5. MichaelWinicki

    MichaelWinicki "You want some?" Staff Member

    41,502 Messages
    14,364 Likes Received

    I agree. Even though David like to beat up on Zim, I don't like the way this group of players has performed. They sucked in the pre-season too. Both the "Pimp-master" and Nor's boy, Chad Eaton were no shows in the Minny game. Can't blame Zim for that. He doesn't sign these doofusses.

Share This Page